Advertisement

Managing IS Services with Something in Between Outsourcing and Insourcing: Buffer Organizations

  • J. Bulchand-Gidumal
  • L. Mola
Chapter

Abstract

Traditionally, organizations have faced the dilemma between ­outsourcing and insourcing, both of which have shown a certain amount of problems. In between the two of them a new concept arises. This is the use of internal markets as a buffering mechanism for organizations, which create an intermediate society between the main organization and the market. This article shows two cases of organizations from different environments in which the sourcing process involved the creation of an intermediate organization to act as the described buffering mechanism. Both processes were related to the IT function. The first case was that of a Public Spanish University that decided to create the buffer society as a way to outsource certain IS/ICT functions while retaining a good level of control over workers and over management of these functions. The second case was that of an Italian SME which decided to create a buffer company in order to manage the implementation project of an ERP System. The study of the two cases has helped us identify and confirm empirically a number of features achieved by this internal mechanism use.

Keywords

Internal Market Strategic Alliance Implementation Project Document Retrieval Human Resource Practice 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Hirscheim, R., Lacity, M. (2000), “The myths and realities of information technology outsourcing”, Communications of the ACM, 43(2):99–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lee, J.-N., Huynh, M.Q., Kwok, R. C.-W. and Pi, S.-M. (2003). IT outsourcing evolution: past, present, and future. Communications of ACM 46(5): 84–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gupta, U.G. and Gupta, A. (1992). Outsourcing the IS function: Is it necessary for your oganization. Information Systems Management Journal 14(2): 74–77.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    King, W.R. and Malhotra, Y. (2000). Developing a Framework for Analyzing IS Sourcing. Information and Management 37(6): 323–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Earl, M.J. (1996). The risks of outsourcing IT. Sloan Management Review, 1996, 37(3): 26–32.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    McFarlan, F.W. and Nolan, R.L. (1995). “How to manage an IT outsourcing alliance”. Sloan Management Review 36 (2): 9–24.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lacity, M., Willcocks, L., and Feeny, D. (1996). The value of selective IT sourcing. Sloan Management Review, 1996, 37(3): 13–25.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    King, W. (2001). Guest editorial developing a sourcing strategy for IS: A behavioral decision process and framework. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 48(1), 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rouse, A. and Corbitt, B. (2004) IT-supported business process outsourcing (BPO): the good, the bad and the ugly, 2004 Information Systems Adoption and Business Productivity, the Eighth Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, PACIS, Shanghai, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dearden, J. (1987). The withering away of the IS organization, Sloan Management Review 28(4), pp. 87–91.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Physica-Verlag Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Las Palmas de Gran CanariaLas PalmasSpain
  2. 2.Università di VeronaVeronaItaly

Personalised recommendations