Advertisement

Electronic Medical Diary (EMD): Ethical Analysis in a HTA Process

  • D. Sacchini
  • P. Refolo
  • A. Virdis
  • M. Casini
  • E. Traisci
  • V. Daloiso
  • M. Pennacchini
  • I. Carrasco De Paula
Chapter

Abstract

Ethical analysis within Health Technology Assessment (HTA) – a comprehensive form of health policy research that examines the short- and long- term consequences of the application or use of technologies (in a broad meaning) – aims at analysing the moral questions raised by the technology itself and by the consequences of implementing or not a health technology as well as ethical issues that are inherent in the HTA process. The work intends to assess, within a HTA process, the ethical consequences of implementing the Electronic Medical Diary (EMD) in health care systems. The EMD is a device for supporting the daily registration and collection of clinical events related to a certain patient. The storage of these patient-specific clinical data constitutes the patient database (PDB) that may be connected with the many online tools which can improve the flow of information within the hospital information system. Such devices should be able to replace the traditional paper record.

Keywords

Technology Assessment Health Technology Assessment Hospital Information System Ethical Analysis Ethical Evaluation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment (INAHTA) (2006) Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Glossary. http://www.sbu.se/filer/content11/ document/Edu_INHTA_glossary_2006_final . Cited 23 September 2008
  2. 2.
    Preston TA (1989) Assessment of Coronary Bypass Surgery and Percutaneus Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 5: 431–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cicchetti A (2003) Strategic planning in healthcare organizations: the role of health technology assessment. In: Geisler E, Krabbendam K, Schuring R (eds) Technology, healthcare and management in the hospital of the future. Praeger, Westport-LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Banta HD (2003) The Development of Health Technology Assessment. Health Policy 63: 121–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    European network for Health Technology Assessment (EUnetHTA) (2007) HTA definition. http://www.eunethta.net/HTA/
  6. 6.
    Goodman CS (1998) HTA 101: Introduction to Health Technology Assessment. Library of Medicine, BethesdaGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Battista RN (1996) Towards a paradigm for technology assessment. In: Peckham M, Smith R Scientific basis of health services. Bmj Publishing Group, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lehoux P, Blume S (2000) Technology Assessment and the Sociopolitics of Health Tech­nologies. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 25: 1083–1118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Heitman E (1998) Ethical issues in technology assessment. conceptual categories and pro­cedural considerations. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 14: 544–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    ten Have H (2004) Ethical perspectives on health technology assessment. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 20: 71–76Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sacchini D, Refolo P (2007) L’Health Technology Assessment (HTA) e i suoi aspetti etici. Medicina e Morale, 1: 101–139 Anderson JG (2007) Social, ethical and legal barriers to E-health, International Journal of Medical Informatics, 76: 480–483Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Braunack-Mayer AJ (2006) Ethics and health technology assessment: Handmaiden and/or critic?. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 22: 307–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    ten Have H (1995) Medical Technology Assessment and Ethics. Ambivalent Relations. Hastings Center Report, 25: 13–19Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Autti-Rämö I, Mäkelä M (2007) Ethical evaluation in health technology assessment reports: an eclectic approach. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 23: 1–8Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hofmann B (2005) Toward a procedure for integrating moral issues in health technology assessment. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 21: 312–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Saarni SI, Hofmann B, Lampe K et al (2008) Ethical analysis to improve decision-making on health technologies. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 86: 617–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sacchini D, Spagnolo AG, Minacori R et al (2005) HTA and ethics: the framework of ethical positions and the proposal of a person-centred model. Italian Journal of Public Health 2: 304Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sacchini D, Refolo P, Virdis A (2008) Gli approcci alle valutazioni etiche nei processi di Health Technology Assessment. Medicina e Morale 2: 319–349Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sgreccia E (1986) Bioetica. Manuale per medici e biologi. Vita e Pensiero, MilanoGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sgreccia E (2007) Manuale di Bioetica. I. Fondamenti ed etica biomedica. Vita e Pensiero, MilanoGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Carrasco de Paula I (2004) Il concetto di persona e la sua rilevanza assiologia: i principi della bioetica personalista. Medicina e Morale 2: 265–278Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Vanni Rovighi S (1963) Elementi di filosofia. III. La Scuola, BresciaGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cotta S (1981) Giustificazione e obbligatorietà delle norme. Giuffrè, MilanoGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Maritain J (1951) Neuf leçons sur les notions premières de la philosophie morale. Téqui, ParisGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Seifert J (1989) Essere e Persona. Verso una fondazione fenomenologica di una metafisica classica e personalista. Vita e Pensiero, MilanoGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bridges JF, Jones C (2007) Patient-based health technology assessment: a vision of the future. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 23 (1): 30–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Burton C, Weller D, Sharpe M (2007) Are electronic diaries useful for symptoms research? A systematic review. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 62: 553–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Torchio M, Molino F, Sestero D, Seidenari C, Molino G (2003) An electronic medical diary for computer assisted patient management. Minerva Medica, 94: 167–179Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lo B (2006) Professionalism in the age of computerised medical records. Singapore Medicine Journal, 47: 1018–1022Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Stanberry B (2000) Telemedicine: barriers and opportunities in the 21st century. Journal of Internal Medicine 247: 615–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Stone AA, Shiffman S, Schwartz JE, Broderick JE, Hufford MR (2003) Patient compliance with paper and electronic diariesc. Controlled Clinical Trials, 24: 182–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
  33. 33.
    Carrasco de Paula I, Comoretto N, Turriziani A (2007) Sulla richiesta di sospensione dei trattamenti nella prospettiva etico-clinica. Medicina e Morale, 2: 1149–1163Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Anderson JG (2007) Social, ethical and legal barriers to E-health, International Journal of Medical Informatics, 76: 480–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Physica-Verlag Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Sacchini
    • 1
  • P. Refolo
    • 1
  • A. Virdis
    • 1
  • M. Casini
    • 1
  • E. Traisci
    • 1
  • V. Daloiso
    • 1
  • M. Pennacchini
    • 2
  • I. Carrasco De Paula
    • 1
  1. 1.Università Cattolica del Sacro CuoreRomaItaly
  2. 2.Università “Campus Bio-Medico”RomaItaly

Personalised recommendations