Advertisement

Epistemology of Information Systems: Time for Something New? Positivism, Interpretivism, and Beyond

  • F. Ricciardi
Chapter

Abstract

Most of the major successes in IS field have occurred outside the scope of academic research (and of consulting activities). The central thesis of this paper is that such a “crisis of relevance” of IS research is (also) due to the quaint epistemological status that the discipline inherited from social sciences. Two epistemological approaches, in fact, are being put in practice in IS field research today: positivism and interpretivism. These are glorious and consistent approaches, but they are both rooted in a nineteenth-century, old-fashioned vision of science (the former to carry on its tradition, the latter to criticize and subvert it). Furthermore, positivism and interpretivism, by their own basic assumptions, deny validity to each other’s outcomes, and this results in a sort of “epistemological apartheid” that causes further damages to the discipline.

Is a different epistemological approach possible? A new one, seeking to better receive the extraordinary amount of complex, original contributions that the last century has supplied about the question “how do we know?” The paper attempts to trace some essential lines of a proposal, and gives some very brief, but concrete examples about a new, “eco-humanistic” approach to IS research.

Keywords

Pattern Match Social Negotiation Information System Research Major Success Epistemological Approach 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Orlikowski, W.J. and Baroudi, J. (1991) Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions. Information Systems Research, 2, 1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Crotty M., (1998) The Foundations of Social Research. Meaning and Perspective in the Research Process, SAGE publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dobson, P.J. and Love, P.E D. (2004) Realist and Postmodernist Perspectives on Information Systems Researc: Points of Connection, Australian Journal of Information Systems 12/1Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen, W. And Hirschheim, R. (2004) A Paradigmatic and Methodological Examination of Information System Research from 1991 to 2001, Information Systems Journal, 14, 197–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Richardson, H. and Robinson, B. (2007) The Mysterious Case of the Missing Paradigm: A Review of Critical Information Systems Research 1991–2001, IS Journal, 17, 251–270.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Latour. B. (2004), A Prologue in form of a Dialog between a Student and his (somewhat) Socratic Professor. In Avgerou, C., Ciborra, C., Land, F.F. (editors) The Social Study of Information and Communication Study. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Weber R., (2004) The rhetoric of Positivism versus Interpretivism, MIS Quarterly, 28, iii–xiiGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pettigrew, A.M. (2001) Management Research after Modernism, British Journal of Management, vol. 12, S61–S70, special issueCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ciborra, C. (2002). The Labyrinths of Information. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lorenz, K. (1973), Behind the Mirror. A search for a natural history of human knowledge, Harcourt Brace, New York.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Einstein, A. (1954) Ideas and Opinions, New York, Random House.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mayr, E. (1982) The growth of biological thought: diversity, evolution and inheritance. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ricciardi, F. (2008) The tacking knowledge strategy. Claudio Ciborra, Konrad Lorenz and the ecology of Information Systems, Interdisciplinary Aspects of Information Systems Studies, Springer.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bateson, G. (1979) Mind and Nature. A Necessary Unity. Hampton Press.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Edelman, G.M. (1992) Bright Air, Brilliant Fire: On the Matter of the Mind, Basic books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Physica-Verlag Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore,BresciaItaly

Personalised recommendations