Advertisement

A Reference Architecture for Semantic Knowledge Coordination

  • S. Castano
  • A. Ferrara
  • S. Montanelli
Chapter

Abstract

In this paper, we present iCoord, a reference architecture for knowledge coordination in open, multi-knowledge information systems. iCoord is a peer-oriented architecture where each node represents a single agent (e.g., an enterprise, a peer) which performs knowledge design as a consequence of or in order to collaborate/interoperate with other external partners for knowledge sharing. A key aspect of iCoord is the capability to support knowledge design not only with the traditional “from scratch” approach, but also by enforcing (re)use through alignment and/or assimilation of externally harvested knowledge chunks.

Keywords

Knowledge Source External Knowledge Concept Definition Reference Architecture Ontology Match 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This paper is partially funded by the EU FP6 BOEMIE (Bootstrapping Ontology Evolution with Multimedia Information Extraction) project.

References

  1. 1.
    Androutsellis-Theotokis, S., Spinellis, D. (2004) A Survey of Peer-to-Peer Content Distribution Technologies. ACM Computing Surveys 36(4), 335–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Castano, S., Ferrara, A., Montanelli, S. (2006) Web Semantics and Ontology, chap. Dynamic Knowledge Discovery in Open, Distributed and Multi-Ontology Systems: Techniques and Applications, pp. 226–256. Idea Group.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Halevy, A. et al. (2004) The Piazza Peer Data Management System. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 16(7), 787–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arenas, M., et al. (2003) The Hyperion Project: From Data Integration to Data Coordination. SIGMOD Record, Special Issue on Peer-to-Peer Data Management 32(3), 53–58.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Castano, S., Ferrara, A., Montanelli, S. (2006) Evolving Open and Independent Ontologies. International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies 1(4), 235–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cimiano, P., Haase, P., Heizmann, J., Mantel, M., Studer, R. (2008) Towards Portable Natural Language Interfaces to Knowledge Bases - The Case of the ORAKEL System. Data & Knowledge Engineering 65(2), 325–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Castano, S., Ferrara, A., Montanelli, S. (2006) Matching Ontologies in Open Networked Systems: Techniques and Applications. Journal on Data Semantics (JoDS) V.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bouquet, P., Serafini, L., Zanobini, S. (2005) Peer-to-Peer Semantic Coordination. Journal of Web Semantics 2(1), 5–24Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sabou, M., d’Aquin, M., Motta, E. (2008) Exploring the Semantic Web as Background Knowledge for Ontology Matching. Journal of Data Semantics (JoDS) 11, 156–190Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Alani, H. (2006) Ontology Construction from Online Ontologies. In: Proc. of the 15th. Int. WWW Conference. Edinburgh, UK. Position paper.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stecher, R., Niederée, C., Nejdl, W., Bouquet, P. (2008) Adaptive Ontology Re-use: Finding and Re-using Sub-ontologies. International Journal of Web Information Systems 4(2), 198–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Physica-Verlag Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Università degli Studi di MilanoMilanoItaly

Personalised recommendations