Governance and Organizational Aspects of an Experimental Groupware in the Italian Public Administration to Support Multi-Institutional Partnerships

  • N. Casalino
  • M. Draoli


The partnerships between research, public administration and ICT industry are considered the main ways to enhance development and competitiveness, but often they involve several organizations, stakeholders and actors. Groupware systems can support collaborative activities using the technology to assist group processes such as information sharing, problem solving, documents editing, decision making, planning, scheduling, etc. We have to understand more about collaborative processes in public administrations to enhance contacts and communication between experts, competence and research centers. So we have to define a model for CSCW governance in order to identify and introduce technological innovations in multi-organizational and highly innovative contexts and, afterwards, disseminate the best practices.


Information System Civil Servant Public Administration Organizational Aspect Computer Support Cooperative Work 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Grudin J. (1994). Groupware and social dynamics, Communications of ACM, 37:92–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Casalino N., Draoli M., Petrucci A., Lancia M., Puccinelli R. (2007). Le reti nella Pubblica Amministrazione e nella Ricerca: metodologie e strumenti open source per la collaborazione multi-organizzazione, AICA 2007, Milano, 233–246.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ciborra C., Olson M. H. (1988). Encountering electronic work groups: a transaction costs perspective, ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work, 94–101.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baskerville R., Myers M.D. (2004). Making IS research relevant to practice. MIS Quarterly 28(3), 329–335.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Strassman P. (1985). Information Payoff: The Transformation of Work in the Electronic Age, New York, Basic Books, 16–23.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Galbraith J. (1977). Organization Design, Addison Wesley Reading, MA, 39–47.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sampler J. (1996). Exploring the Relationship Between Information Technology and Organizational Structure, in Earl M., Information Management: The Organizational Dimension, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 132–144.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Boddy D., Buchanan D. (1986). Managing New Technology, Blackwell, Oxford, 45–59.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lucas H., Baroudi J. (1994). The impact of information technology in organizational design, Journal of Organizational Computing, 11–18.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ciborra C. (1989). Tecnologie Di Coordinamento, Franco Angeli, Milano.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Previtali P. (2003), L’impatto organizzativo delle ICT, Business and Management Sciences International Quarterly Review, 3–4.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kling R. (1991). Co-Operation Co-Ordination and Control in CSCW, Communications of ACM, 34(12):31–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bruschi G., De Marco M., Giustiniani G., Manna E., Rossignoli C. (1992). L’organizzazione Dei Sistemi Informativi Aziendali, Il Mulino, Milano.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Physica-Verlag Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Università Telematica G. MarconiRomaItaly
  2. 2.CeRSI - Università LUISS Guido CarliRomaItaly
  3. 3.CNIPA - Centro Nazionale per l’Informatica nella PARomaItaly

Personalised recommendations