Advertisement

Voluntary Associations and Trustworthiness: An Empirical Examination at Italian Regional Level

  • Giacomo Degli Antoni
Chapter
Part of the AIEL Series in Labour Economics book series (AIEL)

Abstract

This essay studies the level of trustworthiness across Italian regions in relation to three variables: membership in cultural and recreational associations; membership in ecological, civil rights and peace associations; unpaid participation in voluntary service associations (solidarity associations). Two main results emerge: a positive and significant effect of unpaid participation in solidarity associations on the regional level of trustworthiness, and a negative, if not always significant, effect of membership in environmental associations. Consequently, it is unpaid labour of solidarity associations that crucially contributes to the creation of propitious conditions for the diffusion of trustworthy behaviour throughout the community.

Keywords

Instrumental Variable Employment Rate Gini Index Opportunistic Behaviour Labour Force Survey 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Carlo Borzaga, Paolo Buonanno, Sergio Destefanis, Gianluca Grimalda, Benedetto Gui, Lorenzo Sacconi and Stefano Zamagni for their useful suggestions. My thanks go also to the Provincia Autonoma di Trento for financially supporting the project ‘Social capital, corporate social responsibility and local economic development’. Remaining errors are solely my own.

References

  1. Berg J, Dickhaut J, McCabe K (1995) Trust, reciprocity and social history. Games and Economic Behaviour 10:122–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brehm J, Rahn W (1997) Individual-level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital. American Journal of Political Science 41:999–1023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cannari L, D’Alessio G (2003) La distribuzione del reddito e della ricchezza nelle regioni italiane. Banca d’Italia Tema di Discussione 482Google Scholar
  4. Claibourn MP, Martin PS (2000) Trusting and joining? An empirical test of the reciprocal nature of social capital. Political Behavior 22:267–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Degli Antoni G (2006) Capitale sociale e crescita economica: una verifica empirica a livello regionale e provinciale. Rivista Italiana degli Economisti 3:363–393Google Scholar
  6. Gambetta D (1988) Can we trust trust? In Gambetta D (ed) Trust: making and breaking cooperative relations. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  7. Glaeser E, Laibson D, Scheinkman J, Soutter C (2000) Measuring trust. Quarterly Journal of Economics 115:811–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gui B (1994) Interpersonal relations: A disregarded theme in the debate on ethics and economics. In: Lewis A, Warneryd KE (eds) Ethics and economic affairs. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Gui B (2002) Più che scambi, incontri. La teoria economica alle prese con i fenomeni interpersonali. In Sacco PL, Zamagni S (eds) Complessità relazionale e comportamento economico. il Mulino, BolognaGoogle Scholar
  10. Helliwell JF, Putnam R (2000) Economic growth and social capital in Italy. In: Dasgupta P, Serageldin I (eds) Social capital: a multifaceted perspective. World Bank, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  11. Knack P (2003) Groups, growth and trust: cross-country evidence on the Olson and Putnam hypotesis. Public Choice 117:341–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Knack S, Keefer P (1997) Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross country investigation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 112:1251–1287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mayer N (2003) Democracy in France: do associations matter? In: Hooghe M, Stolle D (2003) (eds) Generating social capital. Civil society and institutions in comparative perspective. Palgrave Macmillan, BasingstokeGoogle Scholar
  14. Narayan D (1999) Bonds and bridges: social capital and poverty. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2167Google Scholar
  15. Olson M (1965) The logic of collective action. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MAGoogle Scholar
  16. Olson M (1982) The rise and decline of nations. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  17. Putnam R (with Leonardi R, Nanetti R) (1993) Making democracy work. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  18. Saisana M, Tarantola S (2002) State-of-the-art report on current methodologies and practices for composite indicator development. European Commission Joint Research Centre, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  19. Stolle D, Rochon T (1998) Are all associations alike? Member diversity, associational type and creation of social capital. American Behavioral Scientist 42:47–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tocqueville A (1840) De la démocratie en Amérique. English translation, Democracy in America. Chicago University Press, Chicago2000Google Scholar
  21. Uhlaner CJ (1989) Relational goods and participation: incorporating sociability into a theory of rational action. Public Choice 62:253–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wollebæck D, Selle P (2003) The importance of passive membership for social capital formation. In Hooghe M, Stolle D (2003)Generating social capital. Civic society and institutions in comparative perspective. Palgrave Macmillan, BasingstokeGoogle Scholar
  23. Zak PJ, Knack S (2001) Trust and growth. Economic Journal 111:295–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Physica-Verlag Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giacomo Degli Antoni
    • 1
  1. 1.Centro interuniversitario EconomEticaUniversity of Milano-BicoccaItaly

Personalised recommendations