Non-Tobin’s q in Tests for Financial Constraints to Investment

  • Sílvio Rendon
Part of the Contributions to Economics book series (CE)


Liquidity constrained firms may be under two very well identified investment regimes, constrained and unconstrained. In this paper I derive theoretical investment equations for both regimes and discuss the consequences of ignoring the specific form of the liquidity constrained regime. I also show that expressing the investment equation as a function of Tobin’s q is by no means necessary in theory and in practice, in particular, it is not required to test for liquidity constraints.


Cash Flow Euler Equation Financial Constraint Investment Equation Adjustment Cost 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



I prepared this paper for the Conference: The Economics of Imperfect Markets: Their Interaction and The Consequences for Economic Theory and Policy, University of Rome, La Sapienza, Faculty of Economics, May 16 and 17 2008. I thank Giorgio Cacagnini, Germana Giombini and Enrico Saltari for their kind invitation to participate in this conference. I also thank them as well as several other participants for their useful comments. All errors and omission are only mine.


  1. Abel A (1979) Investment and the value of capital. Garland Publishing, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Abel A (1983) Optimal investment under uncertainty. Am Econ Rev 73:228–233Google Scholar
  3. Abel A (1985) A stochastic model of investment, marginal q and the market value of the firm. Int Econ Rev 26:305–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Banerjee A, Duflo E (2004) Do firms want to borrow more? Testing credit constraints using a directed lending program, CEPR Discussion Papers 4681, C.E.P.R. Discussion PapersGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernanke B, Gertler M, Gilchrist S (1999) The financial accelerator in quantitative business cycle framework. In Taylor JB, Woodford M. Handbook of macroeconomics. Elsevier North HollandGoogle Scholar
  6. Bond S, Van Reenen J (2007) Microeconometric models of investment and employment. In: Heckman J, Leamer E (eds) Handbook of econometrics, vol 6. Elsevier, Amsterdam, chapter 65Google Scholar
  7. Ejarque J, Cooper R (2004) Financial frictions and investment: requiem in Q. Rev Econ Dynam 6:710–728Google Scholar
  8. Eckstein Z, Wolpin K (1989) The specification and estimation of dynamic stochastic discrete choice models. J Hum Res 24:562–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Erickson T, Whited TM (2000) Measurement error and the relationship between investment and q. J Polit Econ 108:1027–1057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fazzari SM, Hubbard RG, Petersen BC (1988) Financing constraints and corporate investment. Brookings Papers Econ Activ 1:141–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gertler M, Gilchrist S (1994) Monetary policy, business cycles and the behavior of small manufacturing firms. Q J Econ 109:309–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gilchrist S, Himmelberg CP (1995) Evidence on the role of cash flow for investment. Journal of Monetary Economics 36:541–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gomes JF (2001) Financing investment. Am Econ Rev 91(5):1263–1285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gould JP (1968) Adjustment costs in the theory of investment of the firm. Review of Economic Studies 35:47–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hayashi F (1982) Tobin’s marginal Q and average Q: a neoclassical interpretation. Econometrica 50:215–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hennessy CA, Whited TM (2007) How costly is external financing? Evidence from a structural estimation. J Finance 62(4):1705–1745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hoshi T, kashyap A, Scharfstein D (1991) Corporate structure, liquidity, and investment: evidence from Japanese industrial groups. Quarterly journal of Economics 106:33–60Google Scholar
  18. Hubbard RG (1998) Capital-market imperfections and investment. J Econ Lit 36(1):193–225Google Scholar
  19. Jorgenson DW (1963) Capital theory and investment behavior. Am Econ Rev 33:247–259Google Scholar
  20. Kaplan SN, Zingales L (1997) Do investment-cash flow sensitivities provide useful measures of financial constraints? Q J Econ 112:169–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Keynes JM (1936) The general theory of employment, interest and money. Macmillan (reprinted 2007), LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Lucas R (1967a) Adjustment costs and the theory of supply. J Polit Econ 75:321–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lucas R (1967b) Optimal investment policy and the flexible accelerator. Int Econ Rev 8:78–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lucas RE, Prescott EC (1971) Investment under uncertainty. Econometrica 39(5):659–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mussa M (1977) External and internal adjustment costs and the theory of aggregate and firm investment. Economica 47:163–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pratap S (2003) Do adjustment costs explain investment-cash flow insensitivity? J Econ Dynam Contr 27(11–12):1993–2006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pratap S, Rendon S (2003) Firm investment in imperfect capital markets: A structural estimation. Rev Econ Dynam 6(3):513–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rust J (1994) Structural estimation of markov decision processes. In: Engle R, McFadden D (eds) Handbook of econometrics, vol IV. North Holland, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  29. Saltari E, Travaglini G (2003) How do future constraints affect current investment? Top Macroecon 3(1):1101–1101Google Scholar
  30. Tobin J (1969) A general equilibrium approach to monetary theory. J Money Credit Bank 1(1):15–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Whited TM (1994) Debt, liquidity constraints and corporate investment: evidence from panel data. J Finance 47:1425–1459CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Physica-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsStony Brook UniversityStony BrookUSA

Personalised recommendations