A Meta-analytic Comparison of Regional Output Multipliers at Different Spatial Levels: Economic Impacts of Tourism

  • Eveline S. van Leeuwen
  • Peter Nijkamp
  • Piet Rietveld


Linear Regression Model Decision Attribute Economic Base Tourism Sector Geographic Entity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Armstrong H, Taylor J (2000) Regional economics and policy. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  2. Baaijens SR, Nijkamp P (1996) Meta-analytic methods for comparative and exploratory policy research, an application to the assessment of regional tourist multipliers. J Policy Model 22(7): 821–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baaijens SR, Nijkamp P, van Montfoort K. (1997) Explanatory meta-analysis of tourist income multipliers an application of comparative research to island economics. Tinbergen Institute discussion paper 97-017/3, RotterdamGoogle Scholar
  4. Begg CB (1994) Publication bias. In: Cooper H, Hedges LV (eds) The handbook of research synthesis. Russell Sage Foundation, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. van den Bergh JCJM, Button KJ, Nijkamp P (1997) Meta-analysis in environmental economics. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  6. Brander LM, van Beukering P, Cesar HSJ (2007) The recreational value of coral reefs: A meta-analysis. Ecol Econ 63(1):209–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bruinsma F, Nijkamp P, Vreeker R (2000) Spatial planning of industrial sites in Europe: A benchmark approach to competitiveness analysis about the suitability of sites for economic activities. Research Memorandum 2000-7, VU University, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  8. Butcher G, Fairweather JR, Simmons DG (2003) The economic impact of tourism on Christchurch City and Akaroa Township. Tourism Recreation Research and Education Centre, Report No. 37Google Scholar
  9. Chang WH (2001) Variations in multipliers and related economic ratios for recreation and tourism impact analysis. Dissertation submitted to Michigan State University, Department of Park, Recreation and Tourism resourcesGoogle Scholar
  10. Fletcher JE (1989) Input–output analysis and tourism impact studies. Ann Tourism Res 16:514–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Frechtling DC (1994) Assessing the economic impacts of travel and tourism – Introduction to travel economic impact estimation. In: Ritchie JRB, Goeldner CR (eds) Travel, tourism and hospitality research, second edition. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Freeman D, Sultan E (1999) The economic impact of tourism in Israel: A multi regional input–output analysis. In: Rietveld P, Shefer D (eds), Regional development in an age of structural economic change. Ashgate, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  13. Gemeente Zandvoort (2004). Zandvoort in economische en toeristische cijfers 2003. Bespiegelingen over economische en toeristische ontwikkelingen. Gemeente Zandvoort, Zandvoort, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  14. Giaoutzi M, Nijkamp P (2006) Emerging trends in tourism development in an open world. In: Giaoutzi M, Nijkamp P (eds) Tourism and regional development: New pathways. Ashgate, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  15. Glass GV, McGaw B, Smith ML (1981) Meta-analysis in social research. SAGE Publications, Beverly HillsGoogle Scholar
  16. Holmgren J (2007) Meta-analysis of public transport demand. Trans Res A Policy Pract 41(10): 1021–1035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. van Leeuwen ES, Nijkamp P, Rietveld P (2006) Economic impacts of tourism: A meta-analytic comparison of regional output multipliers. In: Giaoutzi M, Nijkamp P (eds) Tourism and regional development: New pathways. Ashgate, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  18. Miller RE, Blair PD (1985) Input–output analysis: Foundations and extensions. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs NJGoogle Scholar
  19. Nijkamp P, Pepping G (1998) Meta-analysis for explaining the variance in public transport demand elasticities in Europe. J Trans Stat 1(1):1–14Google Scholar
  20. Nijkamp P, Vindigni G (2000) A multidimensional comparative assessment methodology for policy analysis: a multi-country study of the agricultural sector. J Environ Syst 28:71– 90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Oltmer K (2003) Agricultural policy, land use and environmental effects, studies in quantitative research synthesis. Dissertation. Tinbergen Institute Research Memorandum no. 318, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  22. Pawlak Z (1991) Rough sets: Theoretical aspects of reasoning about data. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  23. Pearce D (1981) Tourist development. Longman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Predki B, Wilk S (1999) Rough Set Based Data Exploration Using ROSE System. In: Ras ZW, Skowron A (eds) Foundations of intelligent systems, lecture notes in artificial intelligence 1609. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 172–180Google Scholar
  25. Stichting Continu Vakantie Onderzoek (2002) Onderzoek ‘Toeristisch bezoek aan steden 2001’. NBTC-NIPO Research, LeidschendamGoogle Scholar
  26. Witten IH, Frank E (2000) Data mining: Practical machine learning tools and techniques with Java implementation. Morgan Kaufman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Physica-Verlag Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eveline S. van Leeuwen
    • 1
  • Peter Nijkamp
    • 2
  • Piet Rietveld
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Department of Spatial EconomicsVU University AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, VU University AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations