Skip to main content

Abstract

In clinical dose finding studies or preclinical carcinogenesis experiments survival times may arise in groups associated with ordered doses. Here interest may focus on detecting dose dependent trends in the underlying survival functions of the groups. So if a test is to be applied we are faced with an ordered alternative in the test problem, and therefore a trend test may be preferable. Several trend tests for survival data have already been introduced in the literature, e.g., the logrank test for trend, the one by Gehan [4] and Mantel [12], the one by Magel and Degges [11], and the modified ordered logrank test by Liu et al. [10], where the latter is shown to be a special case of the logrank test for trend. Due to their similarity to single contrast tests it is suspected that these tests are more powerful for certain trends than for others. The idea arises whether multiple contrast tests can lead to a better overall power and a more symmetric power over the alternative space. So based on the tests mentioned above two new multiple contrast tests are constructed. In order to compare the conventional with the new tests a simulation study was carried out. The study shows that the new tests preserve the nominal level satisfactory from a certain sample size but fail to conform the expectations in the power improvements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bretz, F., Hothorn, L.A.: Statistical Analysis of Monotone or Non-Monotone Dose-Response Data from In Vitro Toxological Assays. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals 31, 81–96 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Büning, H., Trenkler, G.: Nichtparametrische Statistische Methoden (2nd ed.).De Gruyter, Berlin (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Collett, D.: Modelling Survival Data in Medical Research (2nd ed.). Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gehan, E.A.: A Generalized Wilcoxon Test for Comparing Arbitrarily Singly-Censored Samples. Biometrika 52, 203–223 (1965)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Hettmansperger, T.P., Norton, R.M.: Tests for Patterned Alternatives in k-Sample Problems. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 82, 292–299 (1987)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Hirotsu, C.: The Cumulative Chi-Squares Method and a Studentised Maximal Contrast Method for Testing an Ordered Alternative in a One-Way Analysis of Variance Model. Rep. Stat.: Application Research 26, 12–21 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hothorn, L.A., Neuhäuser, M., Koch, H.-F.: Analysis of Randomized Dose Finding Studies: Closure Test Modifications Based on Multiple Contrast Tests. Biometrical J. 39, 467–479 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Jonckheere, A.R.: A Distribution-Free k-Sample Test Against Ordered Alternatives. Biometrika 41, 133–145 (1954)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Leissen, S.: Nichtparametrische Trendtests zur Analyse von rechtszensierten Überlebenszeiten. Diplomarbeit, Fachbereich Statistik, Universität Dortmund, Dortmund (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Liu, P.-Y., Tsai, W.Y., Wolf, M.: Design and Analysis for Survival Data under Order Restrictions with a Modified Logrank Test. Stat. Med. 17, 1469–1479 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Magel, R.C., Degges, R.: Tests for Ordered Alternatives with Right Censored Data. Biometrical J. 40, 495–518 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Mantel, N.: Ranking Procedures for Abitrarily Restricted Observation. Biometrics 23, 65–78 (1967)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mukerjee, H., Robertson, T., Wright, F.T.: Comparison of Several Treatments with a Control using Multiple Contrasts. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 82, 902–910 (1987)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Neuhäuser, M., Hothorn, L.A.: Trend Tests for Dichotomous Endpoints with Application to Carcinogenicity Studies. Drug Inf. J. 31, 463–469 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Neuhäuser, M., Hothorn, L.A.: An Analogue of Jonckheere's Trend Test for Parametric and Dichotomous Data. Biometrical J. 40, 11–19 (1998)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Neuhäuser, M., Seidel, D., Hothorn, L.A., Urfer, W.: Robust Trend Tests with Application to Toxicology. Environ. and Ecol. Stat. 7, 43–56 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Development Core Team: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria (2008), http://www.R-project.org. ISBN 3-900051-07-0

  18. Terpstra, T.J.: The Asymptotic Normality and Consistency of Kendall's Test Against Trend, when Ties are Present in One Ranking. Indigationes Mathe-maticae 14, 327–333 (1952)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Sandra Leissen , Uwe Ligges , Markus Neuhäuser or Ludwig A. Hothorn .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Leissen, S., Ligges, U., Neuhäuser, M., Hothorn, L.A. (2009). Nonparametric Trend Tests for Right-Censored Survival Times. In: Schipp, B., Kräer, W. (eds) Statistical Inference, Econometric Analysis and Matrix Algebra. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2121-5_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics