On Nonparametric Tests for Trend Detection in Seasonal Time Series


We investigate nonparametric tests for identifying monotone trends in time series as they need weaker assumptions than parametric tests and are more flexible concerning the structure of the trend function. As seasonal effects can falsify the test results, modifications have been suggested which can handle also seasonal data. Diersen and Trenkler [5] propose a test procedure based on records and Hirsch et. al [8] develop a test based on Kendall's test for correlation. The same ideas can be applied to other nonparametric procedures for trend detection. All these procedures assume the observations to be independent. This assumption is often not fulfilled in time series analysis. We use the mentioned test procedures to analyse the time series of the temperature and the rainfall observed in Potsdam (Germany) from 1893 to 2008. As opposed to the rainfall time series, the temperature data show positive autocorrelation. Thus it is also of interest, how the several test procedures behave in case of autocorrelated data.


Seasonal Effect Monotone Trend Rainfall Time Series Seasonal Data Trend Detection 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Aiyar, R.J., Guillier, C.L., Albers, W.: Asymptotic relative efficiencies of rank tests for trend alternatives. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 74, 227–231 (1979)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brockwell, P.J., Davis, R.A.: Introduction to time series and forecasting.Springer, New York (2002)MATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cox, D.R., Stuart, A.: Some quick sign tests for trend in location and dispersion. Biometrika 42, 80–95 (1955)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Daniels, H.E.: Rank correlation and population models. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B 12, 171–181 (1950)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Diersen, J., Trenkler, G.: Records tests for trend in location. Statistics 28, 1–12(1996)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Diersen, J., Trenkler, G.: Weighted record tests for splitted series of observations, In: Kunert, J., Trenkler, G. (eds.) Mathematical Statistics with Applications in Biometry, Festschrift in Honour of Prof. Dr. Siegfried Schach,pp. 163–178. Eul, Lohmar (2001)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Foster, F.G., Stuart, A.: Distribution-free tests in time-series based on the breaking of records. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B 16, 1–22 (1954)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hirsch, R.M., Slack, J.R., Smith, R.A.: Techniques of trend analysis for monthly water quality data. Water Resour. Res. 18, 107–121 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hirsch, R.M., Slack. J.R.: A nonparametric trend test for seasonal data with serial dependence. Water Resour. Res. 20, 727–732 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kendall, M.G.: A new measure of rank correlation. Biometrika 30, 81–93 (1938)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kendall, M.G., Gibbons, J.D.: Rank correlation methods. Arnold, London (1990)MATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mann, H.B.: Non-parametric tests against trend. Econometrica 13, 245–259 (1945)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Moore, G.H., Wallis, W.A.: Time series significance tests based on signs of differences. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 38, 153–164 (1943)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    R Development Core Team: R: A language and environment for statistical computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria, ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL: http://www.R-project.org (2008)
  15. 15.
    Silverman, B.W.: EbayesThresh: Empirical Bayes thresholding and related methods. R package version 1.3.0., URL: http://www.bernardsilverman.com (2005)

Copyright information

© Physica-Verlag Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fakultät StatistikTechnische Universität DortmundDortmundGermany

Personalised recommendations