Skip to main content

Abstract

We study some topics of the reliability of measurement, especially certain implications of multidimensionality and unidimensionality. We consider these aspects within a measurement framework focusing on one hand on the dimensionality of the measurement model and on the other hand on the dimensionality of the measurement scale. Working through theorems and examples we compare two reliability estimators, namely Cronbach's alpha and Tarkkonen's rho. It seems that there is not much use for Cronbach's alpha. It is based on unidimensional models and scales, while the models and scales used in practice are multidimensional. Tarkko-nen's rho seems to work well in multidimensional studies, giving support to the real purpose of reliability estimation which seems to have been lost for a quite long time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alwin, D.F.: Margins of Error: A Study of Reliability in Survey Measurement. Wiley, Hoboken, New Jersey (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Blinkhorn, S.F.: Past imperfect, future conditional: Fifty years of test theory. Brit. J. Math. Stat. Psy. 50, 175–185 (1997)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Bollen, K.A.: Structural Equations with Latent Variables. Wiley, New York (1989)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Cronbach, L.J.: On estimates of test reliability. J. Educ. Psychol. 34, 485–494 (1943)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cronbach, L.J.: Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychome-trika 16, 297–334 (1951)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Heise, D.R., Bohrnstedt, G.W.: Validity, invalidity and reliability. In: Borgatta, E.F., Bohrnstedt, G.W. (eds.) Sociological Methodology, pp. 104–129. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jöreskog, K.G.: Statistical analysis of sets of congeneric tests. Psychometrika 36, 109–133 (1971)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Jöreskog, K.G.: Factor analysis and its extensions. In: Cudeck, R., MacCallum, R.C. (eds.) Factor Analysis at 100: Historical Developments and Future Directions, pp. 47–77. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, New Jersey (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kuder, G.F., Richardson, M.W.: The theory of the estimation of test reliability. Psychometrika 2, 151–160 (1937)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lord, F.M., Novick, M.R.: Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Addison-Wesley, London (1968)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Lucke, J.F.: The α and the ω of congeneric test theory: An extension of reliability and internal consistency to heterogeneous tests. Appl. Psych. Meas. 29, 65–81 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. McDonald, R.P.: The theoretical foundations of principal factor analysis, canonical factor analysis, and alpha factor analysis. Brit. J. Math. Stat. Psy. 23, 1–21 (1970)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Mustonen, S.: SURVO MM: Computing environment for creative processing of text and numerical data. http://www.survo.fi/mm/english.html (2001)

  14. Novick, M.R., Lewis, C.: Coefficient alpha and the reliability of composite measurements. Psychometrika 32, 1–13 (1967)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Puntanen, S., Styan, G.P.H.: Matrix tricks for linear statistical models: our personal Top Thirteen. Research report A 345, Dept. of Mathematics, Statistics & Philosophy, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tarkkonen, L.: On Reliability of Composite Scales. No. 7 in Statistical Studies. Finnish Statistical Society, Helsinki, Finland (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tarkkonen, L., Vehkalahti, K.: Measurement errors in multivariate measurement scales. J. Multivariate Anal. 96, 172–189 (2005)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. ten Berge, J.M.F., Soĉan, G.: The greatest lower bound to the reliability of a test and the hypothesis of unidimensionality. Psychometrika 69, 611–623 (2004)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Vehkalahti, K.: Reliability of Measurement Scales. No. 17 in Statistical Research Reports. Finnish Statistical Society, Helsinki, Finland (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Vehkalahti, K., Puntanen, S., Tarkkonen, L.: Effects of measurement errors in predictor selection of linear regression model. Comput. Stat. Data An. 52, 1183–1195 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Weiss, D.J., Davison, M.L.: Test theory and methods. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 32, 629–658 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Werts, C.E., Rock, R.D., Linn, R.L., Jöreskog, K.G.: A general method of estimating the reliability of a composite. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 38, 933–938 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Kimmo Vehkalahti , Simo Puntanen or Lauri Tarkkonen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vehkalahti, K., Puntanen, S., Tarkkonen, L. (2009). Implications of Dimensionality on Measurement Reliability. In: Schipp, B., Kräer, W. (eds) Statistical Inference, Econometric Analysis and Matrix Algebra. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2121-5_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics