Advertisement

The Telecom Policy for Broadband Diffusion: A Case Study in Japan

  • Koshiro Ota
Chapter
Part of the Contributions to Economics book series (CE)

Abstract Though the penetration rate of broadband services in Japan is not outstanding, the transmission speed is much faster and the price is lower than in other advanced countries. Moreover, FTTH is now spreading much faster than DSL. There are two aims of this paper: first, to derive the principle and the substance of the recent Japanese telecom policy; and second, to examine the factors that contribute to the diffusion of broadband services. I will focus not only on the level of unbundled local loop rates but also on the rate-setting methodology for group center and zone center interconnections. I will also argue against some conventional views that “telecoms regulators in Japan have tended to take a stronger line with their incumbent than in Western countries.” In my view, the Japanese telecom policy as a whole was not so hard on NTT, rather it supported NTT’s and other carriers’ business development by taking into consideration NTT’s business situation.

Keywords

Liberal Democratic Party Fiscal Year Digital Subscriber Line Universal Service Broadband Service 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This paper is based on a presentation at the 18th European Regional ITS Conference, October 2–5, 2007, Istanbul. I would like to thank Professor Hitoshi Mitomo (Waseda University) for his encouragement and assistance. I would also like to thank Dr. Brigitte Preissl (the editor of this book) and Professor Chris Czerkawski (Hiroshima Shudo University) for their invaluable comments.

References

  1. Bauer JM (2006) Broadband in the United States. In: Fransman M (ed.) (2006a).Google Scholar
  2. Crandall RW (2005a) Competition and Chaos: The U.S. Telecommunications Sector Since 1996. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  3. Crandall RW (2005b) Broadband Communications. In: Majumdar SK, Vogelsang I, Cave ME (eds.), Handbook of Telecommunications Economics, Vol. 2, North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  4. Crandall RW, Ingraham AT, Singer HJ (2004) Do Unbundling Policies Discourage CLEC Facilities-Based Investment. Topics in Economic Analysis & Policy, 4(1).Google Scholar
  5. Fransman M (ed.) (2006a) Global Broadband Battles: Why the U.S. and Europe Lag While Asia Leads, Stanford Business Books, Stanford.Google Scholar
  6. Fransman M (2006b) Introduction. In: Fransman M (ed.) (2006a).Google Scholar
  7. Hausman JA and Sidak JG (2005) Did Mandatory Unbundling Achieve Its Purpose? Empirical Evidence from Five Countries. J. Comp. Law Econ., 1(1):173–245.Google Scholar
  8. Hazlett TW (2002) Broadband Regulation and the Market: Correcting the Fatal Flaws of Glassman-Lehr. Working Paper, Manhattan Institute.Google Scholar
  9. Hazlett T, Bazelon C (2005) Regulated Unbundling of Telecommunications Networks: A Stepping Stone to Facilities-Based Competition? TPRC.Google Scholar
  10. Ida T (2006) Broadband, Information Society, and National System in Japan. In: Fransman M (ed.) (2006a).Google Scholar
  11. Ikeda N (2003) The Unbundling of Network Elements: Japan’s Experience, RIETI Discussion Paper Series 03-E-023.Google Scholar
  12. NTT (2004) NTT Group’s Medium-Term Management Strategy. NEWS RELEASE.Google Scholar
  13. Softbank (2007) Consolidated Financial Report: For the Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2007.Google Scholar
  14. Tilton M (2004) Nonliberal Capitalism in the Information Age: Japan and the Politics of Telecommunications Reform. JPRI Working Paper, No. 98.Google Scholar
  15. Wallsten S (2006) “Broadband and Unbundling Regulations in OECD Countries,” Working Paper 06-16, AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies.Google Scholar
  16. Willig RD, Lehr WH, Bigelow JP, Levinson SB (2002) Stimulating Investment and the Telecommunications Act of 1996. Report filed by AT&T in FCC Docket 01-338. (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  17. Fair Trade Commission (2004) Broadband Service tō no Kyōsō Jittai ni kansuru Chōsa Hōkokusho.Google Scholar
  18. Information and Communications Council (2004) Heisei 17 Nendo ikō no Setsuzokuryō Santei no Arikata ni tsuite.Google Scholar
  19. Kanzaki M (2006) NTT Min-eika no Kōzai: Kyojin no ‘Dokusen Kaiki wo Tou’. Nikkan Kogyo Shimbun, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  20. Kodama H (2005) Gensōkyoku: Son Masayoshi to Softbank no Kako, Ima, Mirai. Nikkei BP, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  21. Miki N (2006) Softbank ‘Jōsikigai’ no Seikō Hōsoku. Toyo Keizai, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  22. Nakamichi O (2004) Yahoo! BB Network Kōchiku Ki. http://itpro.nikkeibp.co.jp/prembk/NBY/techsquare/20040921/1/?ST=printGoogle Scholar
  23. Nikkei Communications (2003) Sirarezaru Tsūsin Sensō no Shinjitsu (Unknown Facts under the Communication War): NTT, Softbank no Antō. Nikkei BP, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  24. Nikkei Communications (2005) Hikari Kaisen wo meguru NTT, KDDI, Softbank no Yabō: Sirarezaru Tsūsin Sensō no Shinjitsu. Nikkei BP, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  25. Nikkei Communications (2006) 2010 Nen NTT Kaitai: Sirarezaru Tsūsin Sensō no Shinjitsu. Nikkei BP, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  26. NTT East (2006) Information NTT East 2006. NTT East.Google Scholar
  27. NTT West (2006) Data Book NTT West 2006. NTT West.Google Scholar
  28. Oniki H (1996) Jōhō High Way Kensetsu no Economics. Nihonhyōronsha, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  29. Tajiri N (2007) Broadband no Fukyū Yōin to sono Seisaku teki Gan-i ni kansuru Kenkyō (A Study of Factors Contributing to Broadband Diffusion and their Policy Implications). Doctoral dissertation, Waseda University, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  30. Telecommunications Council (2000) Setsuzokuryō Santei no Arikata ni tsuite (Policy on Calculation of Interconnection Charge).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Physica-Verlag Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Koshiro Ota
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Economic SciencesHiroshima Shudo UniversityHiroshimaJapan

Personalised recommendations