Advertisement

The impact of decentralization and inter-territorial interactions on Spanish health expenditure

  • Joan Costa-FontEmail author
  • Francesco Moscone
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Empirical Economics book series (STUDEMP)

This paper examines the determinants of regional public health expenditure in a decentralised health system. Unlike previous studies we take into account possible policy and political interactions among authorities, as well as unobserved heterogeneity. Our emprirical contribution lies in running a spatial panel specification using a dataset of all Spanish region states on aggregated and disaggregated health expenditures (pharmaceuticals, inpatient and primary care). Results are consistent with some degree of interdependence between neighboring regions in spending decisions. Empirical evidence of long term efficiency effects of health care decentralisation, suggests that a specific spatial-institutional design might improve the health system efficiency as well as regional cohesion. Political and scale effects are consistent with theoretical predictions.

Keywords

Health expenditure Decentralisation Spatial econometrics Panels 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander F (1993) Viruses, clusters and clustering of childhood leukemia. Eur J Cancer 29:24–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anselin L (1988) Spatial econometrics: methods and models. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  3. Arbia G (2006) Introductory spatial econometrics with applications to regional convergence. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  4. Baicker K (2005) The spillover effects of state spending. J Public Econ 89:529–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baltagi BH, Song SH, Koh W (2003) Testing panel data regression models with spatial error correlation. J Econom 117:123–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Besley T, Case A (1995) Incumbent's behavior: vote seeking, tax-setting and yardstick competition. Am Econ Rev 85:25–45Google Scholar
  7. Brueckner JK (2000) Welfare reform and the race to the bottom: theory and evidence. South Econ J 66:505–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Costa-Font J, Pons-Novell J (2007) Public health expenditure and spatial interactions in a decentralized national health system. Health Econ 16:291–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Costa-Font J, Rico A (2006) Vertical competition in the Spanish National health System. Public Choice 128:477–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crivelli L, Filippini M, Mosca I (2006) Federalism and regional health expenditures: an empirical analysis of Swiss cantons. Health Econ 15:535–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davis P, Gribben B, Scott A, Lay-Yee R (2000) The supply hypothesis and medical practice variation in primary care: testing economic and clinical models of inter-practitioner variation. Soc Sci Med 50:407–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Di Matteo L, Di Matteo R (1998) Evidence on the determinants of Canadian Provincial Government Health Expenditure 1965–1991. J Health Econ 17:211–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Florax RJGM, Folmer H, Rey SJ (2003) Specification searches in spatial econometrics: the relevance of Hendry's methodology. Reg Sci Urban Econ 33:557–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gatrell AC, Whitelegg J (1993) Incidence of childhood cancer in Preston and South Ribble Research Report Environmental Epidemiology Research Unit, Lancaster UniversityGoogle Scholar
  15. Giannoni M, Hittris T (2002) The regional impact of health care expenditure: the case of Italy. Appl Econ 34:1829–1836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Henrekson M (1988) Swedish government growth: a disequilibrium analysis. In: Lybeck JA, Henrekson M (eds) Explaining the Growth of Government. North-Holland, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  17. Hsiao C (2003) Analysis of panel data, econometric society monographs. Cambridge University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. Hsiao CK (2000) Comparing the performance of two indices for spatial model selection: application to two mortality data. Stat Med 19:1915–1930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lopez-Casasnovas G, Costa-Font J, Planas I (2005) Diversity and regional inequalities: assessing the outcomes of the Spanish ‘system of health care services’. Health Econ 14S:S221–S235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lorant VT, Thomas I, Deilege I, Tonglet R (2001) Deprivation and mortality: the implications of spatial autocorrelation for health resources allocation. Soc Sci Med 53:1711–1719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McMillen DP (2003) Spatial autocorrelation or model misspecification? Int Reg Sci Rev 26:208–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Moscone F, Knapp M (2005) Exploring the spatial pattern of mental health expenditure. J Mental Health Policy Econ 8:205–217Google Scholar
  23. Moscone F, Knapp M, Tosetti E (2007a) Mental health expenditure in England: a spatial panel approach. J Health Econ 4:659–864Google Scholar
  24. Moscone F, Tosetti E, Knapp M (2007b) SUR model with spatial effects: an application to mental health expenditure. Health Econ Lett 11(2):3–9Google Scholar
  25. Navarro V, Muntaner C, Borrell C, Benach J, Quiroga A, Rodriguez-Sanz M, Verges N, Pasarin MI (2006) Politics and health outcomes. Lancet 368:1033–1037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Newhouse JP (1977) Medical care expenditure: a cross-national survey. J Hum Resour 12:115–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Newhouse JP (1992) Medical care costs: how much welfare loss? J Econ Perspect 6:3–21Google Scholar
  28. Okunade AA, Murthy VNR (2002) Technology as a major driver of health care costs: a cointegration analysis of the Newhouse conjecture. J Health Econ 21:147–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Parkin D, McGuire A, Yule B (1987) Aggregate health care expenditures and national income: is health care a luxury good? J Health Econ 6:109–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Revelli F (2002) Testing the tax mimicking versus expenditure spill-over hypotheses using English data. Appl Econ 34:1723–1731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Revelli F (2006) Performance rating and yardistick competition in social service provision. J Public Econ 90:459–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rico A, Costa-Font J (2006) Power rather than path? The dynamics of health care federalism in Spain. J Health Polit Policy Law 30:231–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Skinner J, Wennberg JE (2000) Regional inequality in medicare spending. The key to medicare reform? Front Health Policy Res 3:89–96Google Scholar
  34. Tavares J (2004) Does the rightorleft matter? Cabinets, credibility and adjustments.J Public Econ 88:2447–2468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Thouez JP, Emard JF, Beaupre M, Latreille J, Ghadirian P (1997) Space-time analysis of the incidence of cancer in certain sites of Quebec: 1984–1986 and 1989–1991. Can J Public Health 88:48–51Google Scholar
  36. Zellner A (1962) An efficient method for estimating seemingly unrelated regressions and tests of aggregation bias. J Am Stat Assoc 58:977–992CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Physica-Verlag Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.European InstituteLSE Health and Social Care, London School of EconomicsLondonUK
  2. 2.Department of Economics and Girton CollegeUniversity of LeicesterLeicesterUK

Personalised recommendations