Spatial and supply/demand agglomeration economies: State- and industry-linkages in the U.S. food system

  • Jeffrey P. CohenEmail author
  • Catherine J. Morrison Paul
Part of the Studies in Empirical Economics book series (STUDEMP)

Cost-impacts of spatial and industrial spillovers on economic performance are evaluated by incorporating activity level measures for nearby states and related industries into a cost function model. We focus on localization and urbanization economies for state level food processing industries, from activity levels of similar industries in neighboring states, agricultural input suppliers, and final product demand. We find significant cost-savings from proximity to other food manufacturing centers, and areas with high purchasing power. Cost savings from locating near an agricultural area are also evident, although it seems costly to be located within a rural agricultural state, implying thin market diseconomies. Marginal production costs instead appear higher in more urban, and lower in more rural, areas. These spillover patterns also have input composition implications; materials demand responses are the most closely tracked by the agglomeration cost effects, and capital and labor impacts vary.

Key words

Spatial costs food agglomeration 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anselin L (1988) Spatial econometrics: Methods and models. Kluwer Academic Publishers, BostonGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnade C, Gopinath M (1998) Capital adjustment in U.S. agriculture and food processing: A cross sectoral model. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 23(1):85–98 (July)Google Scholar
  3. Atkinson SE, Halvorson R (1990) Tests of allocative efficiency in regulated multi-product firms. Resources and Energy 12(1):65– 77 (April)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bartlesman E, Caballero RJ, Lyons RK (1994) Customer- and supplier-driven externalities. American Economic Review 84(4):1075–1084Google Scholar
  5. Baumol WJ, Panzar JC, Willig RD (1982) Contestable markets and the theory of industry structure. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Bell KP, Bockstael NE (2000) Applying the generalized-moments estimation approach to spatial problems Involving Microlevel Data. The Review of Economics and Statistics 82(1):72–82 (February)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berndt ER (1991) The practice of econometrics. Addison Wesley publishing Company, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  8. Case AC, Rosen HS, Hines JR, Jr (1993) Budget spillovers and fiscal policy interdependence. Journal of Public Economics 52:285–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ciccone A, Hall RE (1996) Productivity and the density of economic activity. American Economic Review 86(1):54–70 (March)Google Scholar
  10. Coe DT, Helpman E (1995) International R&D Spillovers. European Economic Review 39: 859–887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. David P, Rosenbloom J (1990) Marshallian factor markets, externalities, and the dynamic of industrial localization. Journal of Urban Economics 28:349–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Feldman MP (1999) The new economics of innovation, spillovers and agglomeration: A review of empirical studies. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 8(1–2):5–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goetz SJ (1997) State- and county-level determinants of food manufacturing establishment growth: 1987–1993. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79(3):838–850 (August)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goodwin BK, Brester GW (1995) Structural change in factor demand relationships in the U.S. Food and kindred products industry. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77(1): 69–79 (Febraury)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gopinath M, Vasavada U (1999) Patents, R&D, and market structure in the U.S food processing industry. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 24(1):127–39 (July)Google Scholar
  16. Hall RE (1989) Temporal agglomeration. National Bureau of Economics Research, Working paper #3143. OctoberGoogle Scholar
  17. Hall RE (1990) Invariance properties of Solow's productivity residual. In: Diamond P (ed) Growth/productivity/employment: Essays to celebrate Bob Solow's birthday. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  18. Hoover EM (1948) The location of economic activity. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Huang KS (1991) Factor demands in the U.S. food-manufacturing industry. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73(3):615–620 (August)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kelejian HH, Prucha IR (1999) A generalized moments estimator for the autoregressive parameter in a spatial model. International Economic Review 40(2):509–533 (May)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Krugman P (1991) Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy 99: 483–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kumbhakar SC (2001) Estimation of profit functions when profit is not maximum. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83(1):1–19 (Febraury)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Morrison CJ (1985) Primal and dual capacity utilization: An application to productivity measurement in the U.S. automobile industry. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 3(4):312–324 (October)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Morrison CJ (1997) Structural change, capital investment and productivity in the food processing industry. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79(1):110–125 (February)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. O'Sullivan A (2000) Urban economics, 4th ed. McGraw-Hill publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Paul C, Morrison J, Siegel D (1998) knowledge capital and cost structure in the US food and fiber industries. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80(1):30–45 (February)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Paul C, Morrison J, Siegel D (1999) Scale economies and industry agglomeration externalities: A dynamic cost function approach. American Economic Review 89(1):272– 290 (March)Google Scholar
  28. Sickles RC, Streitwieser, ML (1998) An analysis of technology, productivity, and regulatory distortion in the interstate natural gas transmission industry: 1977– 1985. Journal of Applied Econometrics 13(4):377– 395 (July/Aug)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zucker LG, Darby MR (1998) Capturing technological opportunity via Japan's star scientists: Evidence from Japanese firms' biotech patents and products. Journal of Technology Transfer 26(1–2):37–58 (January)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Physica-Verlag Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeffrey P. Cohen
    • 1
    Email author
  • Catherine J. Morrison Paul
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Economics, Finance and InsuranceBarney School of Business University of HartfordWest HartfordUSA
  2. 2.Department of Agricultural and Resource EconomicsUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations