Assessment Criteria
For the normative evaluation of the current system of own resources as well as discussed proposals for the reform of the system, the literature offers a wide range of assessment criteria. Some attempts have been made so far to offer a comprehensive set of criteria, for example, European Commission (1998; 2004a), Caesar (1990), Cattoir (2004), Begg and Grimwade (1998), Walthes (1996), Henke (1997) and Heinemann (2003).
Apart from these often resembling sets of criteria, we have developed our own view as summarised in chapter 2. This is necessary as many of the existing approaches share the weakness that the choice of these criteria seems to be biased according to the author’s view, either in favour of or against giving more financial autonomy to the EU, for example, by introducing an EU tax. Another weak point of many sets of criteria is their rather ad hoc construction due to a lacking link to economic theory.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2008). Appendix. In: Reform Options for the EU Own Resources System. ZEW Economic Studies, vol 40. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2066-9_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2066-9_8
Publisher Name: Physica-Verlag HD
Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-2065-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-7908-2066-9
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)