Skip to main content

Weighted Mixed Regression Estimation Under Biased Stochastic Restrictions

  • Chapter
Recent Advances in Linear Models and Related Areas

The use of prior information in linear regression analysis is well known to provide more efficient estimators of regression coefficients. Such prior information can be available in different forms from various sources like as past experience of the experimenter, similar kind of experiments conducted in the past, etc. The available prior information sometimes can be expressed in the form of exact, stochastic or inequality restrictions. The methods of restricted regression estimation, mixed estimation (Theil and Goldberger (1961)) and minimax estimation are preferred when prior information is available in the form of exact, stochastic and inequality restrictions, respectively. More details about these estimation procedures can be found in Rao, Toutenburg, Shalabh and Heumann (2008).

When the prior information is available in the form of stochastic restrictions, then in many applications a systematic bias is also present. Such systematic bias can arise from different sources and due to various reasons like personal judgements of the persons involved in the experiment, in testing of general linear hypothesis in linear models when null hypothesis is rejected, in imputation of missing values through regression approach etc. Teräsvirta (1980) and Hill and Ziemer (1983) have given some interesting examples for this type of information. How to incorporate such systematic bias in the estimation procedure is an issue which is addressed in this article. The method of weighted mixed regression estimation is utilized for the purpose. How to choose the weights in this estimation procedure so as to have gain in efficiency under the criterion of mean dispersion error matrix is also addressed.

The plan of the paper is as follows. The model description and the estimation of parameters are discussed in Section 2. The properties of the estimators are derived and analyzed in Section 3. Some conclusions are placed in Section 4.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Hill C, Ziemer RF (1983) Missing regressor values under conditions of multicollinearity. Communications in Statistics (Theory and Methods) A12:2557-2573

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Mathai AM, Provost SB (1992) Quadratic Forms in Random Variables: Theory and Application. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao CR, Toutenburg H, Shalabh, Heumann C (2008) Linear Models and Generalizations - Least Squares and Alternatives (3rd edition). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Teräsvirta T (1980) Linear restrictions in misspecified linear models and polynomial distributed lag estimation. Research report no. 16, Department of Statistics, University of Helsinki 1-39

    Google Scholar 

  • Teräsvirta T (1982) Superiority comparisons of homogeneous linear estimators. Communications in Statistics (Theory and Methods) A11:1595-1601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theil H, Goldberger AS (1961) On pure and mixed estimation in econometrics. International Economic Review 2: 65-78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theobald CM (1974) Generalizations of mean square error applied to ridge regression. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B36:103-106

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Toutenburg H (1989) Mean-square-error-comparisons between re-stricted least squares, mixed and weighted mixed estimators. Forschungsbericht 89/12, Universität Dortmund, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Toutenburg H, Trenkler G (1990) Mean square error matrix compar-isons of optimal and classical predictors and estimators in linear re-gression. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 10:297-305

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Trenkler G (1981) Biased Estimators in the Linear Regression Model. Hain, Königstein/Ts

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Trenkler G (1985) Mean square error matrix comparisons of estimators in linear regression. Communications in Statistics (Theory and Methods) A14: 2495-2509

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Trenkler G, Toutenburg H (1990) Mean-square error matrix comparisons between biased estimators-an overview of recent results. Statistical Papers 31:165-179

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wijekoon P, Trenkler G (1995) Pre-test estimation in the linear regression model under stochastic restrictions. Ceylon Journal of Sciences: Physical sciences 2/1:57-64

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Heumann, C., Shalabh (2008). Weighted Mixed Regression Estimation Under Biased Stochastic Restrictions. In: Recent Advances in Linear Models and Related Areas. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2064-5_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics