Skip to main content

Optimal Central Composite Designs for Fitting Second Order Response Surface Linear Regression Models

  • Chapter
Recent Advances in Linear Models and Related Areas

The central composite design (CCD) is a design widely used for estimating second order response surfaces. It is perhaps the most popular class of second order designs. Since introduced by Box and Wilson (1951), the CCD has been studied and used by many researchers.

This paper deals with optimal CCDs under several design criteria for fitting second order response surface regression models. In Section 2, results on optimal CCDs under the criteria of orthogonality, rotatability and slope rotatability are reviewed. In Section 3, we discuss optimal CCDs under alphabetic design optimality criteria. The appropriate values of ? which minimize the squared bias when the true model is of third order are suggested in Section 4. Finally, in Section 5, considering all possible design criteria, suitable values of ? for the practical design purpose are recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Box GEP, Draper, NR (1963) The choice of a second order rotatable design Biometrika. 50:335-352.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Box GEP, Draper NR (1987) Empirical Model-Building and Response Surfaces. John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Box GEP, Hunter JS (1957) Multifactor experimental design for explor-ing response surfaces. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 28:195-241.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Box GEP, Wilson KB (1951) On the experimental attainment of opti-mum conditions. Journal of Royal Statistical Society B13:1-38.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hader RJ, Park SH (1978) Slope-rotatable central composite designs. Technometrics 20:413-417.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Khuri AI, Cornell JA (1996) Response Surfaces: Designs and Analyses (2nd edition). Marcel Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers RH (1976) Response Surface Methodology. Blacksburg, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers RH, Montgomery DC (2002) Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments (2nd edition). John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park SH (1987) A class of multifactor designs for estimating the slope of response surfaces. Technometrics 29:449-453.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Park SH, Kim HJ (1992) A measure of slope-rotatability for second order response surface experimental designs. Journal of Applied Statistics 19:391-404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Park, S.H., Kim, H.J., Cho, JI. (2008). Optimal Central Composite Designs for Fitting Second Order Response Surface Linear Regression Models. In: Recent Advances in Linear Models and Related Areas. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2064-5_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics