Skip to main content

Time Dependent Relative Risk Aversion

  • Conference paper
Risk Assessment

Part of the book series: Contributions to Economics ((CE))

Risk management has developed in the recent decades to be one of the most fundamental issues in quantitative finance. Various models are being developed and applied by researchers as well as financial institutions. By modeling price fluctuations of assets in a portfolio, the loss can be estimated using statistical methods. Different measures of risk, such as standard deviation of returns or confidence interval Value at Risk, have been suggested. These measures are based on the probability distributions of assets' returns extracted from the data-generating process of the asset.

However, an actual one dollar loss is not always valued in practice as a one dollar loss. Purely statistical estimation of loss has the disadvantage of ignoring the circumstances of the loss. Hence the notion of an investor's utility has been introduced. Arrow [2] and [10] were the first to introduce elementary securities to formalize economics of uncertainty. The so-called Arrow-Debreu securities are the starting point of all modern financial asset pricing theories. Arrow—Debreu securities entitle their holder to a payoff of 1$ in one specific state of the world, and 0 in all other states of the world. The price of such a security is determined by the market, on which it is tradable, and is subsequent to a supply and demand equilibrium. Moreover, these prices contain information about investors' preferences due to their dependence on the conditional probabilities of the state of the world at maturity and due to the imposition of market-clearing and general equilibrium conditions. The prices reflect investors' beliefs about the future, and the fact that they are priced differently in different states of the world implies, that a one-dollar gain is not always worth the same, in fact its value is exactly the price of the security.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ait Sahalia, Y. and Lo, A. W. [2000], ‘Nonparametric risk management and implied risk aversion’, Journal of Econometrics 94, 9–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arrow, K. J. [1964], ‘The role of securities in the optimal allocation of risk bearing’, Review of Economic Studies 31, 91–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Arrow, K. J. [1965], ‘Aspects of the theory of risk-bearing’, Yr j ö Hahnsson Foundation, Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  4. Black, F. and Scholes, M. [1973], ‘The pricing of options and corporate liabililties’, Journal of Political Economy 81, 637–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Breeden, D. and Litzenberger, R. [1978], ‘Prices of state-contingent claims implicit in option prices’, Journal of Business 51, 621–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brown, D. P. and Jackwerth, J. C. [2004], ‘The pricing kernel puzzle: Reconciling index option data and economic theory’, Working Paper, University of Konstanz / University of Wisconsin

    Google Scholar 

  7. Campbell, J. and Cochrane, J. H. [1999], ‘A consumption-based explanation of aggregate stock market behavior’, Journal of Political Economy 107

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cochrane, J. H. [2001], ‘Asset pricing’, Princeton University Press,Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  9. Constantinides, G. [1982], ‘Intertemporal asset pricing with heterogeneous consumers and without demand aggregation’, Journal of Business 55, 253–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Debreu, G. [1959], ‘The theory of value’, Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  11. Derman, E. and Kani, I. [1994], ‘The volatility smile and its implied tree’, Quantitative strategies research notes, Goldman Sachs

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fengler, M. R. [2005], ‘Semiparametric modelling of implied volatility’, Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  13. Franke, J., Härdle, W. and Hafner, C. [2004], ‘Statistics of financial markets’, Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  14. Härdle, W. [1990], ‘Applied nonparametric regression’, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  15. Härdle, W. and Hlávka, Z. [2005], ‘Dynamics of state price densities’, SFB 649 Discussion paper 2005-021, CASE, Humboldt University, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  16. Härdle, W. and Zheng, J. [2002], ‘How precise are distributions predicted by implied binomial trees?’, in: W. Hardle, T. Kleinow and G. Stahl (eds.), Applied Quantitative Finance, Springer, Berlin, Ch. 7

    Google Scholar 

  17. Huynh, K., Kervella, P. and Zheng, J. [2002], ‘Estimating state-price densities with nonparametric regression’, in: W. Hardle, T. Kleinow and G. Stahl (eds.), Applied Quantitative Finance, Springer, Berlin, Ch. 8

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jackwerth, J. C. [2000], ‘Recovering risk aversion from option prices and realized returns’, Review of Financial Studies 13, 433–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P., Schmidt, P. and Shin, Y. [1992], ‘Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we that economic series have a unit root’, Journal of Econometrics 54, 159–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lucas, R. E. [1978], ‘Asset prices in an exchange economy’, Econometrica 46, 1429–1446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mas-Colell, A., Whinston, M. and Green, J. [1995], ‘Microeconomic theory’, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  22. McGrattan, E. and Prescott, E. [2003], ‘Taxes, regulations and the value of us and uk corporations’, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Research Department Staff Report 309

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mehra, R. and Prescott, E. [1985], ‘The equity premium — a puzzle’, Journal of Monetary Economics 15

    Google Scholar 

  24. Merton, R. [1973], ‘Rational theory of option pricing’, Journal of Economics and Management Science 4, 141–183

    Google Scholar 

  25. Prais, S. J. and Winsten, C. B. [1954], ‘Trend estimators and serial correlation’, Cowles Commission Discussion Paper 383, Chicago 383

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pratt, J. [1964], ‘Risk aversion in the small and in the large’, Econometrica 32

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rookley, C. [1997], ‘Fully exploiting the information content of intra day option quotes: Applications in option pricing and risk management’, University of Arizona

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rosenberg, J. V. and Engle, R. F. [2002], ‘Empirical pricing kernels’, Journal of Financial Economics 64, 341–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rubinstein, M. [1976], ‘The valuation of uncertain income streams and the pricing of options’, Bell Journal of Economics 7, 407–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rubinstein, M. [1994], ‘Implied binomial trees’, Journal of Finance 49, 771–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sen, A. and Srivastava, M. [1990], ‘Regression analysis: Theory, methods and applications’, Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  32. Veldkamp, L. [2005], ‘Media frenzies in markets for financial information’, American Economic Review, 96(3), 577–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Weil, P. [1989], ‘The equity premium puzzle and the risk-free rate puzzle’, Journal of Monetary Economics 24, 401–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Enzo Giacomini , Michael Handel or Wolfgang K. Härdle .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Giacomini, E., Handel, M., Härdle, W.K. (2009). Time Dependent Relative Risk Aversion. In: Bol, G., Rachev, S.T., Würth, R. (eds) Risk Assessment. Contributions to Economics. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2050-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics