Risk management has developed in the recent decades to be one of the most fundamental issues in quantitative finance. Various models are being developed and applied by researchers as well as financial institutions. By modeling price fluctuations of assets in a portfolio, the loss can be estimated using statistical methods. Different measures of risk, such as standard deviation of returns or confidence interval Value at Risk, have been suggested. These measures are based on the probability distributions of assets' returns extracted from the data-generating process of the asset.
However, an actual one dollar loss is not always valued in practice as a one dollar loss. Purely statistical estimation of loss has the disadvantage of ignoring the circumstances of the loss. Hence the notion of an investor's utility has been introduced. Arrow [2] and [10] were the first to introduce elementary securities to formalize economics of uncertainty. The so-called Arrow-Debreu securities are the starting point of all modern financial asset pricing theories. Arrow—Debreu securities entitle their holder to a payoff of 1$ in one specific state of the world, and 0 in all other states of the world. The price of such a security is determined by the market, on which it is tradable, and is subsequent to a supply and demand equilibrium. Moreover, these prices contain information about investors' preferences due to their dependence on the conditional probabilities of the state of the world at maturity and due to the imposition of market-clearing and general equilibrium conditions. The prices reflect investors' beliefs about the future, and the fact that they are priced differently in different states of the world implies, that a one-dollar gain is not always worth the same, in fact its value is exactly the price of the security.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ait Sahalia, Y. and Lo, A. W. [2000], ‘Nonparametric risk management and implied risk aversion’, Journal of Econometrics 94, 9–51
Arrow, K. J. [1964], ‘The role of securities in the optimal allocation of risk bearing’, Review of Economic Studies 31, 91–96
Arrow, K. J. [1965], ‘Aspects of the theory of risk-bearing’, Yr j ö Hahnsson Foundation, Helsinki
Black, F. and Scholes, M. [1973], ‘The pricing of options and corporate liabililties’, Journal of Political Economy 81, 637–654
Breeden, D. and Litzenberger, R. [1978], ‘Prices of state-contingent claims implicit in option prices’, Journal of Business 51, 621–651
Brown, D. P. and Jackwerth, J. C. [2004], ‘The pricing kernel puzzle: Reconciling index option data and economic theory’, Working Paper, University of Konstanz / University of Wisconsin
Campbell, J. and Cochrane, J. H. [1999], ‘A consumption-based explanation of aggregate stock market behavior’, Journal of Political Economy 107
Cochrane, J. H. [2001], ‘Asset pricing’, Princeton University Press,Princeton
Constantinides, G. [1982], ‘Intertemporal asset pricing with heterogeneous consumers and without demand aggregation’, Journal of Business 55, 253–268
Debreu, G. [1959], ‘The theory of value’, Wiley, New York
Derman, E. and Kani, I. [1994], ‘The volatility smile and its implied tree’, Quantitative strategies research notes, Goldman Sachs
Fengler, M. R. [2005], ‘Semiparametric modelling of implied volatility’, Springer, Berlin
Franke, J., Härdle, W. and Hafner, C. [2004], ‘Statistics of financial markets’, Springer, Heidelberg
Härdle, W. [1990], ‘Applied nonparametric regression’, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Härdle, W. and Hlávka, Z. [2005], ‘Dynamics of state price densities’, SFB 649 Discussion paper 2005-021, CASE, Humboldt University, Berlin
Härdle, W. and Zheng, J. [2002], ‘How precise are distributions predicted by implied binomial trees?’, in: W. Hardle, T. Kleinow and G. Stahl (eds.), Applied Quantitative Finance, Springer, Berlin, Ch. 7
Huynh, K., Kervella, P. and Zheng, J. [2002], ‘Estimating state-price densities with nonparametric regression’, in: W. Hardle, T. Kleinow and G. Stahl (eds.), Applied Quantitative Finance, Springer, Berlin, Ch. 8
Jackwerth, J. C. [2000], ‘Recovering risk aversion from option prices and realized returns’, Review of Financial Studies 13, 433–451
Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P., Schmidt, P. and Shin, Y. [1992], ‘Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we that economic series have a unit root’, Journal of Econometrics 54, 159–178
Lucas, R. E. [1978], ‘Asset prices in an exchange economy’, Econometrica 46, 1429–1446
Mas-Colell, A., Whinston, M. and Green, J. [1995], ‘Microeconomic theory’, Oxford University Press
McGrattan, E. and Prescott, E. [2003], ‘Taxes, regulations and the value of us and uk corporations’, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Research Department Staff Report 309
Mehra, R. and Prescott, E. [1985], ‘The equity premium — a puzzle’, Journal of Monetary Economics 15
Merton, R. [1973], ‘Rational theory of option pricing’, Journal of Economics and Management Science 4, 141–183
Prais, S. J. and Winsten, C. B. [1954], ‘Trend estimators and serial correlation’, Cowles Commission Discussion Paper 383, Chicago 383
Pratt, J. [1964], ‘Risk aversion in the small and in the large’, Econometrica 32
Rookley, C. [1997], ‘Fully exploiting the information content of intra day option quotes: Applications in option pricing and risk management’, University of Arizona
Rosenberg, J. V. and Engle, R. F. [2002], ‘Empirical pricing kernels’, Journal of Financial Economics 64, 341–372
Rubinstein, M. [1976], ‘The valuation of uncertain income streams and the pricing of options’, Bell Journal of Economics 7, 407–425
Rubinstein, M. [1994], ‘Implied binomial trees’, Journal of Finance 49, 771–818
Sen, A. and Srivastava, M. [1990], ‘Regression analysis: Theory, methods and applications’, Springer, New York
Veldkamp, L. [2005], ‘Media frenzies in markets for financial information’, American Economic Review, 96(3), 577–601
Weil, P. [1989], ‘The equity premium puzzle and the risk-free rate puzzle’, Journal of Monetary Economics 24, 401–421
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Giacomini, E., Handel, M., Härdle, W.K. (2009). Time Dependent Relative Risk Aversion. In: Bol, G., Rachev, S.T., Würth, R. (eds) Risk Assessment. Contributions to Economics. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2050-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2050-8_3
Publisher Name: Physica-Verlag HD
Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-2049-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-7908-2050-8
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)