As socio-economic stakeholders, in most of the countries in the world, businesses, institutions, trade and public organizations and associations presently all heavily question the possibility of ensuring compatibility and a certain consistency among major societal issues with their own strategies and development.
The “managerial” terms for referring to such issues vary, but we note they are increasingly disseminated. Given the present preeminence of certain expressions such as “CSR” for “corporate social responsibility” in the dialogue of many managers and in researcher publications, we could be led to think such concepts and reasoning are new and linked to a contemporary context. This, however, is not the case, since we also find such concerns with theoreticians and corporate specialists as of the mid 20th century, and more broadly, as of a quarter of a century!
Hence, we may wonder if this is not a cyclical fad phenomenon, or if, on the contrary, in the present day we find ourselves in a much more critical situation than in the past, which would lead to highlighting old, underlying concerns from another angle.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ansoff HI (1980) Strategic Issue Management. Strategic Management Journal 1:131-148
Ansoff HI (1983) Societal Strategy for the Business Firm. In: Lamb R (ed) Advances in Strategic Management. JAI Press, pp 31-60
Bartoli A, Hermel P (1987, 1989) Le développement de l’entreprise. Nouvelles conceptions et pratiques. Economica, Paris
Bowen HR (1953) Social responsibilities of the businessman. Harper & Row, New York
Brenkert G (2002) Entrepreneurship, Ethics and the Good Society. Business Ethics Quarterly 3:5-43
Brundtland GH (1987) Notre avenir à tous. Rapport de la Commission mondiale sur l’environnement et le développement soumis à l'Assemblée nationale des Nations unies. Ministère des communications, Québec
Carroll AB (1979) A three dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance. The Academy of Management Review 4(4):497-505
Carroll AB (1991) The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons 34 (4):39-48
Carroll AB (1999) Corporate social responsibility. Business and Society 38(3):268-295
Centre des Jeunes Dirigeants (1996) L’entreprise au 21ème siècle: lettre ouverte aux dirigeants pour réconcilier l’entreprise et la société. Flammarion, Paris
European Union (2005) Green Paper on Corporate Social Responsibility. Available from http://europa.eu/scadplus/leg/en/lvb/n26039.htm
Freeman RE (1984) Strategic Management. A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman Publishing Inc, Marshfield
NRE (2001) Loi française n°2001-420 du 15 mai 2001 sur les nouvelles régulations économiques (NRE), article 116
Martinet AC (1984) Management stratégique: organisation et politique. McGrawHill, Paris
McGuire JW (1963) Business and Society. McGraw-Hill, New York
Mintzberg H (1983) Power In and Around Organizations. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey
Votaw D (1973) Genius Becomes Rare: A comment in the Doctrine of Social Responsibility. California Management Review 15(3):5-19
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hermel, P. (2008). Social Responsibility, Strategic Management and Comprehensive Corporate Development: Old Roots, New Issues?. In: Zink, K.J. (eds) Corporate Sustainability as a Challenge for Comprehensive Management. Contributions to Management Science. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2046-1_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2046-1_14
Publisher Name: Physica-Verlag HD
Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-2045-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-7908-2046-1
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)