Advertisement

The Future of Work in a Sustainable Society

  • Colin G. Drury
Part of the Contributions to Management Science book series (MANAGEMENT SC.)

The rapid pace of change in our society has been well documented, and models predict that it will continue at an increasing rate. We need to make plans and take actions based on realistic future states to ensure that our actions result in a sustainable planet despite limited resources, not one currently overshooting the earth’s capacity. The technical conditions for overshoot are growth, a resource limit and faulty actions by a controller. All are present in the world and in aspects of work. Humans, however, do not perceive accelerating changes particularly well, with a tendency to predict linear future states. This disparity between perception and reality may help explain the lack of action by many governments and organizations faced with choices they would rather put off for short-term political/economic gain. As ergonomists we have a major role to play adapting our actions to the future of work, which in turn depends on the future of the enterprises where we work, and ultimately on the future of society. This paper looks at the future of work from a sustainability perspective and suggests actions ergonomics can take to be ready for an accelerating future.

Keywords

Social Capital Statistical Process Control Triple Bottom Line Global Supply Chain Sustainable Society 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bearden DA (2003) A complexity-based risk assessment of low-cost planetary missions: when is a mission too fast and too cheap? Acta Astronautica 52:371-379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chen A-J, Drury CG (1999) Human errors and customer service quality. Proceedings of the International Conference on TQM and Human Factors - towards successful integration. Linkoping University and Institute of Technology, Linkoping, pp 76-81Google Scholar
  3. Deegan C (1999) Triple bottom line reporting: a new reporting approach for the sustainable organisation. Charter 70:40-42Google Scholar
  4. Dresner S (2002) The Principles of Sustainability. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Drury CG (2006) Ergonomics and the Future of Work: Beyond Technology. (Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society of Australia, 42nd Annual Meeting, November 2006 in Sydney)Google Scholar
  6. Friedman, TL (2006) The World is Flat. Updated and Expanded edition Penguin Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Fukuyama F (1999) The Great Disruption: Human Nature and the Reconstitution of Social Order. The Free Press New York, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Goldenhar LM, Hecker S, Moir S and Rosencrarce J (2003) “The Goldilocks Model” of overtime in construction: not too much, not too little, but just right. Journal of Safety Research 34(2):215-226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gottsdanker RM (1952) The accuracy of predicted motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology 43:26-36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Green F (2003) Why has work effort become more intense? Industrial Relations 43:709-741Google Scholar
  11. Grönroos C (1990) Service Management and Marketing. Lexington Books, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  12. Holmes S (2006) Boeing’s Global Strategy Takes Off. Business Week Jan 30, 2006Google Scholar
  13. Jacobs JA and Gerson K (2004) The Time Divide: Work, Family, and Gender Inequality. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  14. Karasek RA and Theorell T (1990) Healthy Work. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Kelly HW and Drury CG (2002) Sociotechnical reasons for the de-evolution of statistical process control. ASQ Quality Management Journal 9(1):8-22Google Scholar
  16. Kurzweil R (2005) The singularity is near: when humans transcend biology. Viking Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. McReur DT and Jex HR (1967) A review of quasi-linear pilot models. IEEE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics, HFE 8:231-249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Meadows DH, Meadows DL, Randers J and Behrens WW (1972) The Limits to Growth. Universe Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Meadows DH, Randers J and Meadows DL (2004) Limits to Growth: The 30-year Update. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Moray N (1993) Technosophy and Humane Factors: A Personal View. Human factors professionals should focus on practical solutions to global problems. Ergonomics in Design 1(4):33-39Google Scholar
  21. NRC (2001) Musculoskeletal Disorders and the Workplace. National Academy Press, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  22. Norman DA, Bobrow DJ (1975) On data limited and resource limited processes. Cognitive Psychology 5:44-64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Paulson LP (2006) Service Science: A new field for today’s economy. IEEE Computer 39(1):24-26Google Scholar
  24. Putnam RD (2000) Bowling Alone. Simon and Schuster, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Ropohl G (1999) Philosophy of Socio-Technical Systems, Phil & Tech 4:3Google Scholar
  26. Schor JB (1991) The Overworked American. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Stiglitz JE (2006) Making Globalization Work. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Szafran RF (2002) Age-adjusted labor force participation rates 1960-2045. Monthly Labor Review 125(9):25-38Google Scholar
  29. Wackernagel M, Schulz NB, Deumlin D, Linares AC, Jenkins M, Kapos V, Monfreda C, Loh J, Myers N, Norgaard R and Randers J (2002) Tracking the ecological overshoot of the human economy. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 49(14), pp 9266-9272Google Scholar
  30. Wang L, Lin L (2007) A methodological framework for the triple bottom line accounting and management of industry enterprises. International Journal of Production Research 45(5):1063-1088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Watson I, Buchanan J, Campbell I and Briggs C (2003) Fragmented Futures. The Federation Press, Annandale, New South WalesGoogle Scholar
  32. WCC (1974) Report of Ecumenical Study Conference on Science and Technology for Human Development. World Council of Churches, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  33. WCED (1987) Our Common Future, Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Physica-Verlag Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Colin G. Drury
    • 1
  1. 1.The State University of New York Industrial & Systems EngineeringUniversity at BuffaloBuffaloUSA

Personalised recommendations