The Influence of Project Duration and Focus on Involvement in Participatory Processes

  • Peter Vink
Part of the Contributions to Management Science book series (MANAGEMENT SC.)

A hypothesis on the influence of project duration and focus on involvement in participatory processes is formulated based on the literature. Longer lasting projects could theoretically have more involvement of top management. Technological oriented projects should have less top management involvement and more involvement of engineers and designers compared with more organizational focused projects.

Asking 277 experts about their latest project indicated that top management is significantly more involved in the longer lasting projects and engineers and designers more in the technological oriented projects. The disadvantage of this study is that it concerns a specific group of experts interested in participatory ergonomics biasing the outcome and categories could be interpreted freely by the experts. Further (longitudinal) casecontrol research is needed to have a better and more valuable predictive value of the effects of involvement of various participants.


Idea Selection Middle Management Specific Phase Participatory Process Employee Involvement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Beevis D, Slade IM (2003) Ergonomics - costs and benefits. Ergonomics 34 (5):413-418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cotton JL (1993) Employee Involvement. Methods for Improving Performance and Work Attitudes. Sage Publications, Newbury ParkGoogle Scholar
  3. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (1999) Communiqué 7/8. EFILWC, DublinGoogle Scholar
  4. Haines H, Wilson JR, Vink P, Koningsveld EAP (2002) Validating a Framework for Participatory Ergonomics. Ergonomics 45:309-327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Imada AS (1994) Overcoming cultural barriers within organizations. In: Bradley GE, Hendrick HW (eds) Human Factors in Organizational Design and Management IV. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 625-630Google Scholar
  6. Ingelgård A, Norrgren F (2001) Effects of change strategy and top-management involvement on quality of working life and economic results. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 27:93-105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. De Jong AM, Vink P (2002) Participatory ergonomics applied in installation work. Applied Ergonomics 33:439-448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Koningsveld EAP, Dul J, van Rhijn JW, Vink P (2005) Enhancing the impact of ergonomics. Ergonomics 48:559-580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lawler EE (1986) High-Involvement Management. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  10. Looze MP de, Urlings IJM, Vink P, Rhijn JW van, Miedema MC, Bronkhorst RE, Grinten MP van der (2001) Towards successful physical stress reducing products: an evaluation of seven cases. Applied Ergonomics 32:525-534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Molen HF van der, Sluiter JK, Hulshof CTJ, Vink P, Duivenbooden C van, Holman R, Frings-Dresen MHW (2005) Implementation of participatory ergonomics intervention in construction companies. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health 31:191-203Google Scholar
  12. Vink P (2005) Comfort and design: principles and good practices. CRC Press, Baco RatonGoogle Scholar
  13. Vink P, Imada AS, Zink KJ (2008) Defining stakeholder involvement in participatory design processes (submitted to Applied Ergonomics in 2007)Google Scholar
  14. Vink P, Koningsveld EAP, Molenbroek JFM (2006) Positive outcomes of participatory ergonomics in terms of greater comfort and higher productivity. Applied Ergonomics 37:537-546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Zink KJ, Steimle U and Schröder D (2008) Comprehensive Change Management Concepts as a Prerequisite for Sustainable Success (accepted for publication in Applied Ergonomics)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Physica-Verlag Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Vink
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Industrial Design EngineeringDelft University of TechnologyNetherlands

Personalised recommendations