Advertisement

Human Factors, Business Excellence and Corporate Sustainability: Differing Perspectives, Joint Objectives

  • Klaus J. Zink
  • Ulrich Steimle
  • Klaus Fischer
Part of the Contributions to Management Science book series (MANAGEMENT SC.)

The papers in this book deal with an understanding of sustainability both in the sense of obtaining long-term success and thus survivability of a corporation and in the sense of the normative idea “sustainable development”, which has gained substantial relevance since the early 1970s. These understandings are represented by different approaches which can be seen as exemplary for a (more) comprehensive management, namely human factors on the one hand, and total quality management and business excellence on the other. They all comprise a stakeholder orientation coupled with a time horizon which exceeds the perspective of short-term earnings.

Reflecting the title of this book, this paper intends to show how these understandings are linked together and why realizing corporate sustainability can be seen as a challenge for those comprehensive management approaches.

In the first section, the term “sustainability” is presented in its original context of an economic principle as well as in the sense of the more recent normative concept sustainable development. Starting with these considerations, it is argued that the mentioned approaches are linked by concurring objectives, though differing in time focus and scope. Especially these differences can be seen as a challenge to broaden the perspectives but also to benefit from already existing synergies.

Keywords

Corporate Social Responsibility Sustainable Development Human Factor Organizational Design Total Quality Management 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brown O Jr (2002) Macroergonomics Methods. In: Hendrick HW, Kleiner BM (eds) Macroergonomics: Theory, Methods, and Applications. Lawrence Erbaum, Mahwah, New Jersey, pp 25-44Google Scholar
  2. EFQM (2004) The EFQM Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility. European Foundation for Quality Management, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  3. DIN EN ISO 8402 (1992) Quality Management and Quality Assurance. European Committee for Standardization, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  4. Dyllick T, Hockerts K (2002) Beyond the Business Case for Corporate Sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment 11:130-141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Endres A, Radke V (1998) Zur theoretischen Struktur von Indikatoren einer nachhaltigen Entwicklung. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften 118:295-313Google Scholar
  6. IEA (2000) International Ergonomics Association: Ergonomics International News and Information - August 2000. Marshall Associates, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Hendrick HW, Kleiner BM (2002) Macroergonomics: Theory, Methods, and Applications. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  8. Jastrzebowski W (1857) An Outline of Ergonomics or the Science of Work based on the Truths drawn from the Science of Nature. In: Przyroda i Przemysl (Nature and Industry) No. 29, 1857 (reprinted by the Central Institute for Labour Protection, Warsaw, Poland 2000)Google Scholar
  9. Kok P, Wiele van der T, McKenna R, Brown A (2001) A corporate social responsibility audit within a quality management framework. Journal of Business Ethics 31:285-297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Nutzinger HG (1995) Von der Durchflußwirtschaft zur Nachhaltigkeit - Zur Nutzung endlicher Ressourcen in der Zeit. In: Biervert B, Held M (eds) Zeit in der Ökonomik: Perspektiven für die Theorienbildung. Campus Verlag, Frankfurt/Main, pp 207-237Google Scholar
  11. O’Tool J, Lawler III EE (2006) The American Workplace. Plagrave-MacMillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Pearce D, Barbier E, Markandya A (1990) Sustainable Development: Economics and Environment in the Third World. Edward Elgar, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  13. Prahalad CK (2005) The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid: Eradicating Poverty Through Profits. Wharton School Publishing, Upper Saddle River, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  14. Rau J, Zink KJ (1996) Total Quality Management and Environmental Management. In: Ulhøi JP, Madsen H (eds) Industry and the Environment: Proceedings of the 3rd Conference of the Nordic Business Environment, 28-30 March 1996, Aarhus, pp 421-430Google Scholar
  15. Solow RM (1974) Intergenerational Equity and Exhaustible Resources. Review of Economic Studies 41:29-45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Schaltegger S, Sturm A (1990) Ökologische Rationalität: Ansatzpunkte zur Ausgestaltung von ökologieorientierten Managementinstrumenten. Die Unternehmung 4:273-290Google Scholar
  17. Schmidheiny S (1999) Öko-Effizienz als wesentlicher unternehmerischer Beitrag zur Förderung einer nachhaltigen Entwicklung. In: Gomez P, Müller-Stewens G, Rüegg-Stürm J (eds) Entwicklungsperspektiven einer integrierten Managementlehre. Paul Haupt, Bern et al., pp 135-148Google Scholar
  18. Steimle U (2007) Stakeholderorientierung und nachhaltige Entwicklung - Beitrag des EFQM-Modells zu mehr unternehmerischer Nachhaltigkeit. In: Haas B, Oetinger R, Ritter A, Thul MJ (eds) Nachhaltige Unternehmensführung. Excellence durch Verknüpfung wirtschaftlicher, sozialer und gesellschaftlicher Forderungen. Hanser, München, Wien, pp 141-158Google Scholar
  19. Steimle U, Zink KJ (2006) Sustainable Development and Human Factors. In: Karwowski W (ed) International Encyclopedia of Ergonomics and Human Factors, 2nd edn. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 2258-2263Google Scholar
  20. UNCED (1992) United Nations Conference on Environment and Development: Rio Declaration on Environment and Development. Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
  21. Waddock S, Bodwell C (2002) Total Responsibility Management: The Manual. Greenleaf Publishing, SheffieldGoogle Scholar
  22. Waddock SA, Bodwell C, Graves SB (2002) Responsibility: The new business imperative. Academy of Management Executive 16(2):132-148Google Scholar
  23. WCED (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  24. Zink KJ (1995) Introducing TQM as Organisational Design and Management Concept. In: Moraes de A, Marino S (eds) Proceedings IEA World Conference: 3rd Latin American Congress and 7th Brazilian Ergonomics Congress, 16-20 October, Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
  25. Zink KJ (2002) A Vision of the Future of Macro-Ergonomics. In: Hendrick HW, Kleiner BM (eds) Macroergonomics: Theory, Methods, and Applications. Lawrence Erlbaum. Mahwah, New Jersey, pp 347-358Google Scholar
  26. Zink KJ (2003) Corporate Social Responsibility Promoting Ergonomics. In: Luczak H, Zink KJ (eds) Human Factors in Organizational Design and Management - VII: Re-Designing Work and Macroergonomics - Future Perspectives and Challenges. IEA Press, Santa Monica California, pp 63-72Google Scholar
  27. Zink KJ, Eberhard D (2006) Lifecycle oriented product management and integration of human factors. In: ISSA (ed) Facteurs Humains et Conception des Systèmes de Travail: optimiser les performances de l’entreprise (Design process and human factors integration: Optimising company performance). Colloque International, 1-3 March, NiceGoogle Scholar
  28. Zink KJ, Steimle U (2007) Corporate Social Responsibility and Organizational Excellence - Linking Stakeholder Approach and Resource-Based View. Paper presented at the 6th international MAAOE Conference “New Perspectives on the Theories and Practices of Organizational Excellence”, 19-22 June, University of Versailles Saint-Quentin-En-YvelinesGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Physica-Verlag Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Klaus J. Zink
    • 1
  • Ulrich Steimle
    • 1
  • Klaus Fischer
    • 1
  1. 1.Chair of Industrial Management and Human FactorsUniversity of KaiserslauternGermany

Personalised recommendations