Abstract
This study deals with educational production in Austria and is focused on the impact of schoolmates on students’ academic outcomes. We use PISA 2000 and 2003 data to estimate peer effects for 15 and 16 year old students. School fixed effects are employed to address the potential self-selection of students into schools and peer groups. The estimations show significant positive effects of the peer group on students’ reading achievement, and less so for mathematics. The peer effect in reading is larger for students from less favorable social backgrounds. Furthermore, quantile regressions suggest peer effects in reading to be asymmetric in favor of low-ability students, meaning that students with lower skills benefit more from being exposed to clever peers, whereas those with higher skills do not seem to be affected much.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ammermüller A, Pischke JS (2006) Peer effects in European primary schools: evidence from PIRLS. Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn, Discussion paper no. 2077
Angrist JD, Lang K (2004) Does school integration generate peer effects? Evidence from Boston’s Metco program. Am Econ Rev 94(5):1613-1634
Arcidiacono P, Nicholson S (2005) Peer effects in medical school. J Public Econ 89(2-3):327-350
Bandura A (1986) Observational learning, chapter 2. In: Social foundations of thought and action. A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, USA
Bayer P, Pintoff R, Pozen DE (2004) Building criminal capital behind bars: peer effects in juvenile corrections. Yale School of Management, Working Paper, July 2004
Bénabou R (1993) Workings in a city: location, education and production. Q J Econ 108(3):619-652
Betts JR (1998) The impact of educational standards on the level and distribution of earnings. Am Econ Rev 88(1):266-275
Betts JR, Zau A (2004) Peer groups and academic achievement: panel evidence from administra- tive data. Public Policy Institute of California, February 2004
Brunello G, Giannini M, Ariga K (2006) The optimal timing of school tracking. In: Peterson P, Wößmann L (eds) Schools and the equal opportunity problem. MIT Press, Cambridge USA (in press)
Eisenberg D (2004) Peer effects for adolescent substance use: do they really exist? Berkeley School of Public Health, Working Paper, March 2004
Falk A, Ichino A (2006) Clean evidence on peer effects. J Labor Econ 24(1):39-57
Fertig M (2003) Educational production, endogenous peer group formation and class composition. Evidence from the PISA 2000 study. Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn, Discussion paper no. 714
Gächter S, Thöni C (2005) Social learning and voluntary cooperation among like-minded people. J Eur Econ Assoc 3(2-3):303-314
Ganzeboom HBG, DeGraaf PM, Treiman DJ (1992) A standard international index of occupa- tional status. Soc Sci Res 21:1-56
Gibbons S, Telhaj S (2006) Peer effects and pupil attainment: evidence from secondary school transition. London School of Economics, CEP Working paper
Hanushek EA (1997) Assessing the effects of school resources on student performance: an update. Educ Eval Policy Anal 19(2):141-164
Hanushek EA (1999) The evidence on class size. In: Mayer SE, Peterson P (eds) Earning and learning: How schools matter. Brookings Institution, Washington, pp 131-168
Hanushek EA (2002) Evidence, politics, and the class size debate. In: Lawrence M, Rothstein R (eds) The class size debate. Economic Policy Institute, Washington, pp 37-65
Hanushek EA, Wössmann L (2006) Does educational tracking affect performance and inequality? Differences-in-differences evidence across countries. Econ J 116(510):C63-C76
Hanushek EA, Kain JF, Markman JM, Rivkin SG (2003) Does peer ability affect student achieve- ment? J Appl Econ 18(5):527-544
Haider G et al. (2001) PISA 2000. Nationaler Bericht. Österreichischer Studien-Verlag, Innsbruck. (http://www.pisa-austria.at/pisa2000/index.htm.)
Hoxby CM (2000) Peer effects in the classroom: learning from gender and race variation. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working paper no. 7867
Koenker R, Bassett G Jr. (1978) Regression quantiles. Econometrica 46(1):33-50
Kooreman P (2006) Time, money, peers, and parents: some data and theories on teenage behavior. J Popul Econ (in press)
Krauth B (2005) Peer effects and selection effects on youth smoking in Canada. Can J Econ 38(3)
Krueger AB (2003) Economic considerations and class size. Econ J 113(485):F34-F63
Krueger D, Kumar KB (2004) Skill-specific rather than general education: a reason for US-Europe growth differences? J Econ Growth 9(2):167-207
Krueger AB, Whitmore DM (2001) The effect of attending a small class in the early grades on col- lege-test taking and middle school test results: evidence from project STAR. Econ J 111(468)
Lazear EP (2001) Educational production. Q J Econ 116(3):777-803
Levin J (2001) For whom the reductions count? A quantile regression analysis of class size and peer effects on scholastic achievement. Empir Econ 26:221-246
Manski CF (1995) Identification problems in the social sciences. Harvard University Press, Mas- sachusetts
Manski CF (2000) Economic analysis of social interactions. J Econ Perspect 14(3):115-136
McEwan PJ (2003) Peer effects on student achievement: evidence from Chile. Econ Educ Rev 22:131-141
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2001) Knowledge and skills for life. First results from PISA 2000, Paris. http://www.pisa.oecd.org
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2002) PISA 2000 technical report, Paris. http://www.pisa.oecd.org/tech/intro.htm
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2004) Learning for tomorrow’s world: first results from PISA 2003, Paris. http://www.pisa.oecd.org
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2005) PISA 2003 technical report, Paris. http://www.pisa.oecd.org
Robertson D, Symons J (2003) Do peer groups matter? Peer group versus schooling effects on academic achievement. Economica 70:31-53
Sacerdote B (2001) Peer effects with random assignment: Results for Dartmouth roommates. Q J Econ 116(2):681-704
Schindler-Rangvid B (2003) Educational peer effects. Quantile regression evidence from Denmark with PISA 2000 data, chapter 3. Do schools matter? Ph.D. thesis, Aarhus School of Business, Denmark
Schneeweis N (2006) On the integration of immigrant children in education. University of Linz, Working Paper
Soetevent A, Kooreman P (2006) A discrete choice model with social interactions; with an appli- cation to High School teen behavior. J Appl Econ (in press)
Vigdor J, Nechyba T (2004) Peer effects in North Carolina public schools. Duke University Durham USA, Working Paper, July 2004
Winston GC, Zimmerman DJ (2006) Peer effects in higher education. In: Hoxby C (ed) College decisions: How students actually make them and how they could. University of Chicago Press for the NBER (in press)
Wößmann L (2003a) Schooling resources, educational institutions and student performance: the international evidence. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 65(2):117-170
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schneeweis, N., Winter-Ebmer, R. (2008). Peer effects in Austrian schools. In: Dustmann, C., Fitzenberger, B., Machin, S. (eds) The Economics of Education and Training. Studies in Empirical Economics. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2022-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2022-5_7
Publisher Name: Physica-Verlag HD
Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-2021-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-7908-2022-5
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)