Advertisement

Dynamic modelling of large-dimensional covariance matrices

  • Valeri Voev
Part of the Studies in Empirical Economics book series (STUDEMP)

Modelling and forecasting the covariance of financial return series has always been a challenge due to the so-called ‘curse of dimensionality’. This paper proposes a methodology that is applicable in large-dimensional cases and is based on a time series of realized covariance matrices. Some solutions are also presented to the problem of non-positive definite forecasts. This methodology is then compared to some traditional models on the basis of its forecasting performance employing Diebold—Mariano tests. We show that our approach is better suited to capture the dynamic features of volatilities and covolatilities compared to the sample covariance based models.

Keywords

Sample Covariance Forecast Performance GARCH Model Exponentially Weight Move Average Sample Covariance Matrix 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aït-Sahalia Y, Mykland PA, Zhang L 2005 How often to sample a continuous-time process in the presence of market microstructure noise. Rev Financ Stud 18(2):351-416Google Scholar
  2. Andersen T, Bollerslev T, Christoffersen PF, Diebold FX (2006) Volatility forecasting. In: Elliott G, Granger C, Timmermann A (eds) Handbook of economic forecasting, 1st edition, chap 15, ElsevierGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersen TG, Bollerslev T 1998 Answering the skeptics: yes, standard volatility models do provide accurate forecasts. Int Econ Rev 39:885-905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andersen TG, Bollerslev T, Diebold FX, Ebens H 2001a The distribution of stock return volatility. J Financ Econ 61:43-76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Andersen TG, Bollerslev T, Diebold FX, Labys P 2001b The distribution of exchange rate volatility. J Am Stat Assoc 96:42-55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Andersen TG, Bollerslev T, Diebold FX, Labys P 2003 Modeling and forecasting realized volatility. Econometrica 71:579-625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bandi FM, Russell JR (2005) Microstructure noise, realized volatility, and optimal sampling. Working paper, Graduate School of Business, The University of ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  8. Barndorff-Nielsen OE, Shephard N 2004 Econometric analysis of realised covariation: high frequency based covariance, regression and correlation in financial economics. Econometrica 72:885-925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bauwens L, Laurent S, Rombouts J 2006 Multivariate GARCH models: a survey. J Appl Econ 21:79-109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Black F, Litterman R 1992 Global portfolio optimization. Financ Anal J 48(5):28-43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Byström H 2002 Using simulated currency rainbow options to evaluate covariance matrix forecasts. J Int Financ Mark Inst Money 12:216-230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Diebold FX, Mariano RS 1995 Comparing predictive accuracy. J Bus Econ Stat 13(3):253-263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Engle R 1982 Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation. Econometrica 50:987-1007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Engle R 2002 Dynamic conditional correlation: a simple class of multivariate generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity models. J Bus Econ Stat 20:339-350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. French KR, Schwert GW, Stambaugh RF 1987 Expected stock returns and volatility. J Financ Econ 19:3-29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gourieroux C, Jasiak J, Sufana R (2004) The wishart autoregressive process of multivariate stochastic volatility. Working Paper, University of TorontoGoogle Scholar
  17. Hansen PR, Lunde A 2006 Realized variance and market microstructure noise. J Bus Econ Stat 24:127-218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harvey D, Leyborne S, Newbold P 1997 Testing the equality of prediction mean squared errors. Int J Forecast 13:281-291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ledoit O, Wolf M 2003 Improved estimation of the covariance matrix of stock returns with an application to portfolio selection. J Empir Finance 10(5):603-621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ledoit O, Wolf M 2004 Honey, I shrunk the sample covariance matrix. J Portf Manage 31:110-119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Michaud RO 1989 The Markowitz optimization enigma: is ‘optimized’ optimal? Financ Anal J 45(1):31-42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Oomen RCA 2005 Properties of bias-corrected realized variance under alternative sampling schemes. J Financ Econ 3:555-577Google Scholar
  23. Tse Y, Tsui A 2002 A multivariate generalized auto-regressive conditional heteroscedasticity model with time-varying correlations. J Bus Econ Stat 20:351-362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Voev V, Lunde A 2007 Integrated covariance estimation using high-frequency data in the presence of noise. J Financ Econ 5:68-104Google Scholar
  25. Zhang L, Mykland PA, Aït-Sahalia Y 2005 A tale of two time scales: determining integrated volatility with noisy high frequency data. J Am Stat Assoc 100:1394-1411CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Physica-Verlag Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Valeri Voev
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.CoFEUniversity of KonstanzKonstanzGermany
  2. 2.University of KonstanzKonstanzGermany

Personalised recommendations