Regional high-speed trains on the Svealand line: Evaluation of effects

  • Oskar Fröidh
  • Bo-Lennart Nelldal


Several new or upgraded railway lines, primarily for regional or medium distance travel at high speed, have been opened in Sweden since the 1990s. The investment decisions were based on the expected societal benefits of increased accessibility. It was thought that it might be possible to turn regional imbalances, for example in the Stockholm-Mälaren region, into regional development through high-speed train commuting, and unemployment might thus decrease. However, some economists and organisations, for various reasons, have questioned the whole idea of constructing new railways and their possible effects on the travel market and regional development. Therefore, in order to evaluate the effects of the radical change in train service supply, a before and after study was conducted on the new Svealand line.


Public Transport Travel Behaviour Route Choice Railway Station Daily Journey 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Beräkningshandledning (2001) Calculation Guide 2001: BVH 706.00. Banverket [the National Rail Administration], BorlängeGoogle Scholar
  2. Bråthen S, Hervik A (1997) Strait Crossings and Economic Development: Developing Economic Impact Assessment by Means of Ex Post Analyses. Transport Policy 4:193–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fröidh O (2003) Introduction of Regional High-Speed Trains: A Study of the Effects of the Svealand Line on the Travel Market, Travel Behaviour and Accessibility. (Ph.D. thesis) KTH, Division of Transportation and Logistics, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  4. Fröidh O (2005) Market Effects of Regional High-Speed Train on the Svealand Line. Journal of Transport Geography 13:352–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hultkrantz L, Mortazavi R (2001) Anomalies in the Value of Travel-Time Changes. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 35:285–300Google Scholar
  6. Hägerstrand T (1970) What about People in Regional Science? Papers of the Regional Science Association 14:7–21.Google Scholar
  7. Kottenhoff K, Lindh C (1996) The Value and Effects of Introducing High Standard Train and Bus Concepts in Blekinge, Sweden. Transport Policy 2:235–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kottenhoff K (1999) Evaluation of Passenger Train Concepts: Methods and Results of Measuring Travellers’ Preferences in Relation to Costs (Ph.D. thesis). KTH, Division of Traffic and Transport Planning, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  9. McNally MG (2000) The Four-Step Model. In: Hensher DA, Button KJ (eds) Handbook of Transport Modelling. Pergamon, Oxford, pp 35–52Google Scholar
  10. Menéndez JM, Coronado JM, Rivas A (2002) El AVE en Ciudad Real y Puertollano. E.T.S.I Caminos, Canales y Puertos, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Ciudad RealGoogle Scholar
  11. Ortúzar J de D, Willumsen LG (2001) Modelling Transport. 33rd edn Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Physica-Verlag Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Oskar Fröidh
    • 1
  • Bo-Lennart Nelldal
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Transport and LogisticsKTHStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations