Skip to main content

Aligning Goals, Virtuality and Capability: A Virtual Alignment Model

  • Chapter
Becoming Virtual

Part of the book series: Contributions to Management Science ((MANAGEMENT SC.))

Abstract

Given the many forms that a virtual organization might take, a critical first step in becoming virtual is to understand the form of virtual organization that is desired or envisaged. Once the desired form is defined, it is necessary to find out how close to, or distant from, that form the organization currently is, and to develop a strategy for moving from the current to the envisioned form. But, a strategy will only work if the organization has the capabilities necessary for transformation.

Portions of Chapters 1 and 2 are drawn from Jackson PD, Klobas JE (forthcoming) Strategies for Virtual Work. In Putnik GD, Cunha MM (eds) Encyclopedia of Networked and Virtual Organizations. IGI Press, Hershey, PA. Copyright IGI Global. Permission granted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aiken CB, Keller SP (2007, February) The CEO’s role in leading transformation. McKinsey Quarterly. Retrieved 27 May 2007 from http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/article_page.aspx?ar=1912

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alavi M, Tiwana A (2002) Knowledge integration in virtual teams: the potential role of KMS. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 53:1029–1037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aris J (1999) Exploiting the wired-up world. Business Strategy Review 10:47–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bal J, Teo PK (2000) Implementing virtual teamworking, part 1: a best practice review. Logistics Information Management 13:346–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bauer R, Koszegi ST (2002) Measuring the degree of virtualization. Electronic Journal of Organizational Virtualness 5:22–46

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brown JS, Duguid P (2000) The social life of information. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  7. Crandall NF, Wallace MJ (1998) Work & rewards in the virtual workplace. AMACOM, New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. Drucker P (1999) Management challenges for the 21st century. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  9. Eckerson WW (2006) Performance dashboards: measuring, monitoring, and managing your business. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fritz MBW, Narasimhan S, Rhee H-S Communication and coordination in the virtual office. Journal of Management Information Systems 14:7–28

    Google Scholar 

  11. Haywood M (1998) Managing virtual teams: practical techniques for hightechnology project managers. Artech House, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  12. Malhotra A, Majchrzak A, Carman R, Lott V (2001) Radical innovation without collocation: a case study at Boeing-Rocketdyne. MIS Quarterly 25:229–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. McConnell I (2000, August) Risk e-business: seizing the opportunity of global e-readiness. Retrieved 27 May 2007 from http://www.mcconnellinternational.com/ereadiness/EReadinessReport.htm

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nemiro JE (2000) The glue that binds creative virtual teams. In: Malhotra Y (ed) Knowledge management and virtual organizations. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA, pp 101–123

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pan SL, Scarbrough H (1999) Knowledge management in practice: an exploratory case study. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 11:359–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pfeffer J (1981) Management as symbolic action: the creation and maintenance of organizational paradigms. In: Cummings LL, Staw BM (eds) Research in organizational behavior. JAI, Greenwich, CT, vol 3, pp 1–52

    Google Scholar 

  17. Senge P (1990, Fall) The leader’s new work: building learning organizations, Sloan Management Review 32:7–23

    Google Scholar 

  18. Steel GW (2003) Virtual project management: the new frontier. INDECO Ltd. Retrieved 12 November 2003 from http://www.indeco.co.uk/docs/Virtual%20Project%20Management%20march%202002.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  19. Venkatraman N, Henderson JC (1998, Fall) Real strategies for virtual organizing. Sloan Management Review 40:33–48

    Google Scholar 

  20. Warner W, Witzel M (2004) Managing in virtual organizations. Thomson Learning, London

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yap AY, Bjorn-Andersen N (2002) Capturing tacit mental models with 3D technologies: enhancing knowledge-sharing in virtual organizations. Electronic Journal of Organizational Virtualness 4:18–63

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jackson, P., Klobas, J. (2008). Aligning Goals, Virtuality and Capability: A Virtual Alignment Model. In: Klobas, J.E. (eds) Becoming Virtual. Contributions to Management Science. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1958-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics