Advertisement

The Forensics of a Challenged Initiative

  • Paul Jackson
  • Jane Klobas
  • Gaela Bernini
  • Ivan Jensen
  • Stefano Renzi
Part of the Contributions to Management Science book series (MANAGEMENT SC.)

Abstract

In this chapter, we analyze Unit 2’s virtualization initiative, drawing on information gathered throughout the research study and from the perspective of all the points of view that our research team brought together. We begin with the overview of the initiative that we sent to Louise Kjaer at the end of the study. The rest of the chapter describes the method and results of a workshop in which the research team sought to explain the observations described in the overview.

Keywords

Information System Business Case Virtual Organization Critical Success Factor Virtualization Initiative 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ackermann F, Eden C, Cropper S Cognitive mapping: getting started with cognitive mapping. Retrieved 2 May 2006 from http://www.banxia.com/depaper.html.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gray CF, Larson EW (2003) Project management: the managerial process. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Marwaha S, Wilmott P (2006, Fall) Managing IT for scale, speed, and innovation. McKinsey Quarterly, pp 14–21Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Project Management Institute (2000) A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide). Project Management Institute, Newtown Square, PAGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rughase OG (2002) Linking content to process. In: Huff AS, Jenkins M (eds) Mapping strategic knowledge. Sage, London, pp 46–62Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schon DA (1983) The reflective practitioner. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Standards Australia (2005, March) Australian world-first ICT governance standard. Retrieved 10 June 2007 from http://www.standards.org.au/cat.asp?catid=66&ContentId=82&News=1Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ward J, Daniel E (2006) Benefits management: delivering value from IS & IT investments. John Wiley & Sons, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Weill P, Ross JW (2004) IT governance: how top performers manage IT decision rights for superior performance. Harvard Business School Press, BostonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Physica-Verlag Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Jackson
    • 1
  • Jane Klobas
    • 2
    • 3
  • Gaela Bernini
    • 4
  • Ivan Jensen
    • 5
  • Stefano Renzi
    • 6
  1. 1.School of ManagementEdith Cowan UniversityJoondalupAustralia
  2. 2.Carlo F. Dondena Centre for Research on Social DynamicsUniversità BocconiMilanItaly
  3. 3.UWA Business SchoolUniversity of Western AustraliaNedlandsAustralia
  4. 4.Department of Management, Economics and Industrial EngineeringPolitecnico of MilanMilanItaly
  5. 5.University College Copenhagen and MetaManagementHellerupDenmark
  6. 6.Istituto di Metodi QuantitativiUniversità BocconiMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations