Nanotechnology in Korea — Actors and Innovative Potential

  • Iris Wieczorek


National System Intellectual Property Right Nanotechnology Research World Economic Forum National Innovation System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abicht L, Freikamp H, Schumann U (eds) (2006) Ermittlung von Qualifikationserfordernissen in der Nanotechnologie. Cedefop Panorama series 129. Amt für amtliche Veröffentlichungen der Europäischen Gemeinschaften, LuxemburgGoogle Scholar
  2. APNW (Asia Pacific Nanotech Weekly) (2003) Nanotechnology Strategy in Korea — An Ambitious and Dynamic Country in Nanospace. Asia Pacific Nanotech Weekly 1:27. Retrieved October 10, 2006 from Scholar
  3. APNW (Asia Pacific Nanotech Weekly) (2004a) Korea Nanotechnology Fabrication Center. In: Asia Pacific Nanotech Weekly 2:14. Retrieved October 29, 2006 from Scholar
  4. APNW (Asia Pacific Nanotech Weekly) (2004b) Korea National Nanotechnology Initiative — Summary of the Korea Delegation Presentation at the Asia Nanotech Forum. Asia Pacific Nanotech Weekly 2:37. Retrieved October 29, 2006 from Scholar
  5. ATIP (Asian Technology Information Program) (2006) Korean S&T OverviewGoogle Scholar
  6. Bachmann G (1998) Innovationsschub aus dem Nanokosmos. Technologieanalyse. VDI, DüsseldorfGoogle Scholar
  7. BMBF (Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung) (2002) Nanotechnologie in Deutschland. Standortbestimmung. Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, BonnGoogle Scholar
  8. Choi Y (2003) Evolution of Science and Technology Policy in Korea. STEPI (Science and Technology Policy Institute)Google Scholar
  9. Choi CQ (2006) Nano World: National ranking in nanotech. United Press International. Retrieved October 7, 2006 from StoryID=20051104-055543-4903rGoogle Scholar
  10. Cuhls K (2006) Future Direction of Innovation Policy in Japan and Europe. Unpublished presentation at the International Conference Asia’s Growing Importance in the Global Innovation System. Technological, Social and Cultural Dimensions. Hamburg, March 17–19, 2006Google Scholar
  11. Corning GP (2004) Japan and the Politics of Techno-Globalism. M.E.Sharpe, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Doloreux D, Porto S (eds) (n.d.) Regional Innovation System, a Critical Review. Retrieved August 10, 2006 from Scholar
  13. Fagerberg J (2004) What do we know about innovation? Lessons from the TEARI Project. Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University Oslo. Retrieved August 7, 2006 from Scholar
  14. FEER (Far Eastern Economic Review) (2006) The Siren Song of Technonationalism. March 2006Google Scholar
  15. Freeman C (1992) Formal Scientific and Technical Institutions in the National System of Innovation. In: Lundvall, B-A. (ed) National Systems of Innovation. Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. Granleese R (2006) Europe in danger of missing the boat on commercial returns in Nanotechnology — US and Far East lead in patenting nanotechnology applications. In: International, Retrieved October 29, 2006 from Scholar
  17. Hage J, Hollingsworth R (2000) A Strategy for Analysis of Idea Innovation Networks and Institutions. Institut für Sozialwissenschaften, Technische Universität Berlin. Retrieved August 10, 2006 from Scholar
  18. Hemmert M (2005) The Korean Innovation System From Industrial Catch-Up to Technological Leadership? International Conference, Pathways to Innovation: Policies, Products, and Processes for Competitive Advantage in a Global Economy, Nishogakusha University, Tokyo, May 20–21, 2005, Retrieved at October 20, 2006 from Scholar
  19. Invest Korea (2005) Why Korea. Invest Korea, SeoulGoogle Scholar
  20. IRGC Working Group on Nanotechnology (2005) Survey on Nanotechnology Governance. Volume A. The Role of Government, Working Paper No.1, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  21. Kanama D (2006) Patent Application Trends in the Field of Nanotechnology. Science & Technology Trends 21. Retrieved October 20, 2006 from Scholar
  22. Keidanren (2001) Nanoteku ga hajimeru mirai shakai <n-Plan21> [Future Society to Be Created by Nanotechnology (n-Plan 21)]. Retrieved October 20, 2006 from Scholar
  23. Kim K (2003) Firm’s Participation in the Government R&D Program: Current Status and Future Direction. A Report for Ministry of Science and Technology. Science and Technology Policy Institute(STEPI), SeoulGoogle Scholar
  24. Kim L (1993) National Systems of Innovation: dynamics of capability building in Korea. In: R. Nelson (ed) National Systems of Innovation. Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford, pp 357–383Google Scholar
  25. KITA (Korea Industrial Technology Association) (2002) Survey on the Current Status of Foreign Research Institutes in Korea. Korea Industrial Technology Association, SeoulGoogle Scholar
  26. KITA (Korea Industrial Technology Association) (2003) White Paper on Industrial Technology. Korea Industrial Technology Association, Seoul. Retrieved October 20, 2006 from Scholar
  27. Lauterwasser C (eds) (2005) Small sizes that matter: Opportunities and risks of Nanotechnologies. Report in co-operation with the OECD International Futures Programme. London/Ismaning. Retrieved March 8, 2006 from 0,,796454-44,00.htmlGoogle Scholar
  28. Lim H (2004) Nanotechnology in Korea — Policy & Technical Overview and Assessment. Presentation at the US-Korea Conference, August 12. 2004Google Scholar
  29. Lim C (2005) Korea National System of Innovation. Paper for the workshop of the the ESF/Eurocores Project National Systems of Innovation in a Globalising, Knowledgebased Economy. Seoul, 6–9 March 2005Google Scholar
  30. Lundvall BA (ed) (1992) National Systems of Innovation. Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. Pinter, LondonGoogle Scholar
  31. Lundvall BA, Borras S (1997) The globalising learning economy: Implications for innovation policy. Project EUR 18307, Program TSER of the European CommissionGoogle Scholar
  32. Lux Research (2005) The U.S., Japan, South Korea, and Germany Dominate in Nanotechnology Today — But Taiwan and China are Rising. Retrieved August 10, 2006 from http://nanovic. Scholar
  33. Maclurcan DC (2005) Nanotechnology and Developing Countries. Journal of Nanotechnology Online. Retrieved August 10, 2006 from Scholar
  34. Mahlich J (2003) Das japanische Innovationssystem im Überblick. In: Pohl M, Wieczorek I (eds) Japan Wirtschaft und Politik 2003, Institut für Asienkunde, Hamburg, pp 193–221Google Scholar
  35. Marinava D, McAleer M (n.d.) Nanotechnology Strength Indicators: International Rankings Based on US Patents.Google Scholar
  36. Meierhans I, Flock C (2004) Wie wettbewerbsfähig ist Japan? In: Pohl M, Wieczorek I (eds) Japan Wirtschaft und Politik 2004. Institut für Asienkunde, Hamburg, pp 167–189Google Scholar
  37. Meyer-Krahmer F (1999) Was bedeutet Globalisierung für Aufgaben und Handlungsspielräume nationaler Innovationspolitiken? In: Grimmer K (ed) Innovationspolitik in globalisierten Arenen. Neue Aufgaben für Forschung und Lehre. Opladen, Leske und Budrich, pp 43–74Google Scholar
  38. MOST (Ministry of Science and Technology) (n.d.) Nanotechnology Korea. Ministry of Science and Technology, Republic of Korea. Retrieved August 10, 2006 from http://www.most.krGoogle Scholar
  39. Nelson R (ed) (1993) National Innovation Systems. A Comparative Analysis. Oxford Univiversity Press, New York, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  40. Nelson R, Winter S (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  41. OECD (2006a) Main Science and Technology Indicators. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  42. OECD (2006b) Compendium of Patent Statistics 2006. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  43. OECD (2004a) Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2004. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  44. OECD (2004b) Science, Technology and Innovation for the 21st Century. Science and Innovation Policy. OECD, Paris. Retrieved October 20, 2004 from,2340,en_21571361_21590465_21690308_1_1_1_1,00.htmlGoogle Scholar
  45. OECD (2001) Innovative Clusters. Drivers of National Innovation Systems. Enterprise, Industry and Services. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  46. Pascha W, Philipsenburg G (2002) Japans nationales Innovationssystem im Wandel. WiSt 10:560–566Google Scholar
  47. Porter ME, Stern S (2004) Ranking National Innovative Capacity: Findings from the National Innovative Capacity Index. In: Porter ME, Schwab K, Sala-i-Martin X, Lopez-Claros A (eds) The Global Competitiveness Report 2003–2004. Oxford University Press, New York, Oxford, pp 91–116Google Scholar
  48. Powell WW, Grodal S (2005) Networks of Innovators. In: Fagerberg J, Mowery DC, Nelson R (eds) Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford University Press, New York, Oxford, pp 56–85Google Scholar
  49. Rammert W (2000) National Systems of Innovation, Idea Innovation Networks, and Comparative Innovation Biographies, Institut für Sozialwissenschaften, Technische Universität Berlin. Retrieved August 10, 2006 from Scholar
  50. Roco MC (2001) International Strategy for Nanotechnology Research and Development. Retrieved October 22, 2002 from Scholar
  51. Roco MC (2003) Nanotechnology: convergence with modern biology and medicine. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 14:337–346. Retrieved August 10, 2006 from http://www.current-opinion.comCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Roco MC (2006) The ‘nano’ frontier. The Indianapolis Star, 5.2.2006, http://www.indystar.comGoogle Scholar
  53. Sang Hee Suh (n.d.) Strategy and programs for nanotechnology development of Korea. 21C Frontier R&D Program: Center for Nanostructured Materials Technology. Retrieved August 10, 2006 from Scholar
  54. Schumpeter JA (1911) Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. Eine Untersuchung über Unternehmergewinn, Kapital, Kredit, Zins und den Konjunkturzyklus. MünchenGoogle Scholar
  55. UNCTAD [United Nations Conference on Trade and Development] (2003) Investment and Technology. Policies for Competitiveness: Review of successful country experiences. Technology for Development Series. United Nations, New York, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  56. VDI (eds) (2004) Innovations-und Technikanalyse. Nanotechnologie als wirtschaftlicher Wachstumsmarkt. VDI, DüsseldorfGoogle Scholar
  57. WEF [World Economic Forum] (2004) The Global Competitiveness Report 2003-2004. Oxford University Press, New York, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  58. Wieczorek I (2002) Initiativen und Programme zur Förderung der Nanotechnologie in Japan. Japan aktuell 6:552–566Google Scholar
  59. Wieczorek I (2007) Der Nanotechnologiemarkt in Japan. In: Moerke A, Walke A (eds) Japans Zukunftsindustrien. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 145–167Google Scholar
  60. Yusuf S, Evenett SJ (2002) Can East Asia Compete? Innovation for Global Markets. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  61. Yusuf S et al. (eds) (2003) Innovative East Asia. The Future of Growth. Oxford University Press, New York, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  62. Yusuf S, Altaf MA, Nabeshima K (eds) (2004) Global Production Networking and Technological Change in East Asia. Oxford University Press, New York, OxforfGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Physica-Verlag Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Iris Wieczorek
    • 1
  1. 1.GIGA Institute of Asian AffairsHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations