A Simplified Fuzzy Relational Structure for Adaptive Predictive Control
The ability to take into account the impact of the current control action on the future process state. This is a useful when dealing with non-minimum phase behaviors (e.g., to stablize plants whose open-loop response to a positive input step results first in a decrement of the output and only afterwards, in an increment), unknown or partially unknown dynamics.
The ability to accomodate knowledge about future requirements on the plant state represented in terms of a pre-defined tracking reference signal.
Effectiveness of control even when the predictor is a coarse approximator of the plant dynamics
The ability to deal with multiple objectives and constraints, e.g., on the manipulated variable.
KeywordsMembership Function Fuzzy System Fuzzy Rule Composition Operator Recursive Little Square
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- B. Kosko, “Fuzzy systems as universal approximators”, Proc. of IEEE Int. conf on Fuzzy Systems, San Diego, USA, 1992, pp. 1153–1162.Google Scholar
- D. W. Nguyen and B. Widrow, “Neural networks for self-learning control systems”, IEEE Control Systems Magazine, Apr. 1990, 18–23.Google Scholar
- J. Valente de Oliveira and J. M. Lemos, “Speeding up fuzzy relational identification: The RLS approach”, Proc. of the Sixt International Fuzzy Systems Association World Congress, Sao Paulo, Brasil, 1995, pp. 121–124.Google Scholar
- L.X. Wang, “Fuzzy systems are universal approximators”, Proc. of IEEE Inter. Conf. on Fuzzy Systems. San Diego, USA, 1992, pp. 1163–1170.Google Scholar
- X.-J. Zeng and M. Singh, “Approximation theory of fuzzy systems -SISO case”, IEEE Trans, on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 162–176.Google Scholar