Skip to main content

Fuzzy Performance Indicators for the Control of Manufacturing Processes

  • Chapter
Fuzzy Systems Design

Part of the book series: Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing ((STUDFUZZ,volume 17))

Abstract

This study shows one use of the fuzzy subset theory with the aim of taking into account the qualitative, the imprecise and/or uncertain knowledge in a manufacturing context. The focus is more particularly on the evaluation aspects of the industrial processes and activities. This evaluation concerns the results of the different activities or processes’ enactments and consists in comparing them to the assigned objectives. One means to effect this comparison is given by performance indicators. Usual indicators only treat precise and numerical data, while the objectives can be imprecisely, subjectively or gradually defined and the measures uncertainly expressed. By using the fuzzy, the possibilistic and the probabilistic formalisms, the proposed indicators deal with both numerical and symbolic data, and provide either a performance measure or a performance evaluation. Moreover, always in contrast with the usual evaluation, the proposed indicators evaluate a relative performance, with regard to the objective on the one hand, and to the real conditions of the considered enactments on the other hand. While the absolute performance is related to the efficiency measure, the relative performance is useful for the control of the processes. The evaluation of these performances is also based on some fuzzy extensions of general concepts of correspondence, proximity, distance...These ideas are applied to some problems encountered in one ski production process. This production involves first an assembly activity whose performance is driven by many parameters; and at the end of the production, a control quality activity which is performed by human operators, on the basis of subjective features.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. R. S. Kaplan, D.P. Norton, “The balanced scorecard — measures that drive performance”, Harvard Business Review, January — February, 1992, pp. 71–79.

    Google Scholar 

  2. L. Fortuin, “Performance indicators — why, where and how?”, Europ. J. of Operational Research, 34, 1988, pp. 11–20.

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. Berliner, J. Brimson (edited by), “Cost management for today’s advanced manufacturing. The CAM-i conceptual design”, Harvard Business school Press 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  4. L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy sets”, Information and Control, Vol. 8, 1965, pp. 338 –353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 1, n°1, 1978, pp. 3–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Kendall, A. Stuart, The advanced theory of statistics, Ed. Griffin and Co., 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  7. T. W. Liao, Z. Zhang, “A review of similarity measures for fuzzy systems”, FUZZIEEE’96, New Orleans, USA, September 1996, pp. 930–935.

    Google Scholar 

  8. C. Bertoluzza, N. Coral, A. Salas, “On a new class of distances between fuzzy numbers”, Mathware and Soft Computing, 2, 1995, pp. 71–84.

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. Dubois, H. Prade, C. testemale, “Fuzzy pattern matching with extended capabilities, proximity notions, importance assessments, random sets”, Conf. of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing society (NAFIP 86), New Orleans, USA, June 1–4, 1986, pp. 125–139.

    Google Scholar 

  10. W.S. Humphrey, P.H. Feiler, “Software process development and enactment: concepts and definitions”, Tech. Rep. SEI -92-TR-4. Pittsburgh: Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 1992, dans “Process Modeling”, (B. Curtis, M.I. Kellner, J. Over) — Communications of the ACM, Volume 35, n°9, Septembre 1992, pp. 75–90.

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. Shafer, “A mathematical theory of evidence”, Princeton, Univ. Press Princeton, USA, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. Dubois, H. Fargier, H. Prade, “Fuzzy constraints in job-shop scheduling”, J. of Intelligent Manufacturing, 6, 1995, pp. 215–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. G. Mauris, E. Benoit, L. Foulloy, “Fuzzy symbolic sensors: from concepts to applications”, Measurement, 12, 1994, pp. 357–384.

    Google Scholar 

  14. L. A. Zadeh, “Quantitative fuzzy semantics”, Information Sciences, 3, 1971, pp. 159–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. L. Foulloy, S. Galichet, “Typology of fuzzy controllers”, in Theoretical Aspects of Fuzzy Control (H. T. Nguyen, M. Sugeno, R. Tang, R. R. Yager Eds), Wiley, 1995, pp. 65–90.

    Google Scholar 

  16. L. A. Zadeh, “Similarity relations and fuzzy orderings”, Information Sciences, 3, 1971, pp. 177–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. R. Bellmann, L.A. Zadeh, “Decision-making in a fuzzy environment”, Management Science, 17, 1970, B-141 -B-164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. D. Dubois, H. Prade, “Weighted fuzzy pattern matching”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 28, 1988, pp. 313–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. L. A. Zadeh, “Probability measures of fuzzy events”, J. Math. Anal.& Applicat., 23, 1968, pp.421–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. D. Dubois, H. Prade, “A unifying view of comparison indices”, in fuzzy sets and possibility theory recent advances, R.R. Yager Ed, Pergamon press, 1982, pp. 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  21. D. Dubois, H. Prade, S. Sandri, “On possibility / probability transformations”, in Fuzzy logic, R. Lowen and M. Roubens Eds, 1993, pp. 103–112.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. D. Dubois, H. Prade, “A review of fuzzy set aggregation”, Information Sciences, 36, 1985, pp. 85–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. R. R. Yager “Connectives and quantifiers in fuzzy sets”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 40, 1991, pp. 39 – 75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. M. Grabisch, “Fuzzy integral in multi-criteria decision making”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 69, 1995, pp. 279–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. L. Berrah, G. Mauris, A. Haurat, L. Foulloy, “A fuzzy approach for the validation of performance assessment in ski quality control”, IPMU 96, Granada, Spain July 1996, pp. 623–628.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rumbaugh J., Blaha M., Premerlani W., Eddy F., Lorensen W; Object-oriented modeling and design, Prentice Hall Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  27. MOPIC, Modélisation de la performance pour le pilotage à court terme d’un système de production, Research Project on Rhône-Alpes, 1994, France.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Berrah, L., Mauris, G., Foulloy, L., Haurat, A. (1998). Fuzzy Performance Indicators for the Control of Manufacturing Processes. In: Reznik, L., Dimitrov, V., Kacprzyk, J. (eds) Fuzzy Systems Design. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 17. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1885-7_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1885-7_14

  • Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-11811-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7908-1885-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics