Abstract
This study shows one use of the fuzzy subset theory with the aim of taking into account the qualitative, the imprecise and/or uncertain knowledge in a manufacturing context. The focus is more particularly on the evaluation aspects of the industrial processes and activities. This evaluation concerns the results of the different activities or processes’ enactments and consists in comparing them to the assigned objectives. One means to effect this comparison is given by performance indicators. Usual indicators only treat precise and numerical data, while the objectives can be imprecisely, subjectively or gradually defined and the measures uncertainly expressed. By using the fuzzy, the possibilistic and the probabilistic formalisms, the proposed indicators deal with both numerical and symbolic data, and provide either a performance measure or a performance evaluation. Moreover, always in contrast with the usual evaluation, the proposed indicators evaluate a relative performance, with regard to the objective on the one hand, and to the real conditions of the considered enactments on the other hand. While the absolute performance is related to the efficiency measure, the relative performance is useful for the control of the processes. The evaluation of these performances is also based on some fuzzy extensions of general concepts of correspondence, proximity, distance...These ideas are applied to some problems encountered in one ski production process. This production involves first an assembly activity whose performance is driven by many parameters; and at the end of the production, a control quality activity which is performed by human operators, on the basis of subjective features.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
R. S. Kaplan, D.P. Norton, “The balanced scorecard — measures that drive performance”, Harvard Business Review, January — February, 1992, pp. 71–79.
L. Fortuin, “Performance indicators — why, where and how?”, Europ. J. of Operational Research, 34, 1988, pp. 11–20.
C. Berliner, J. Brimson (edited by), “Cost management for today’s advanced manufacturing. The CAM-i conceptual design”, Harvard Business school Press 1988.
L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy sets”, Information and Control, Vol. 8, 1965, pp. 338 –353.
L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 1, n°1, 1978, pp. 3–28.
M. Kendall, A. Stuart, The advanced theory of statistics, Ed. Griffin and Co., 1977.
T. W. Liao, Z. Zhang, “A review of similarity measures for fuzzy systems”, FUZZIEEE’96, New Orleans, USA, September 1996, pp. 930–935.
C. Bertoluzza, N. Coral, A. Salas, “On a new class of distances between fuzzy numbers”, Mathware and Soft Computing, 2, 1995, pp. 71–84.
D. Dubois, H. Prade, C. testemale, “Fuzzy pattern matching with extended capabilities, proximity notions, importance assessments, random sets”, Conf. of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing society (NAFIP 86), New Orleans, USA, June 1–4, 1986, pp. 125–139.
W.S. Humphrey, P.H. Feiler, “Software process development and enactment: concepts and definitions”, Tech. Rep. SEI -92-TR-4. Pittsburgh: Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 1992, dans “Process Modeling”, (B. Curtis, M.I. Kellner, J. Over) — Communications of the ACM, Volume 35, n°9, Septembre 1992, pp. 75–90.
G. Shafer, “A mathematical theory of evidence”, Princeton, Univ. Press Princeton, USA, 1976.
D. Dubois, H. Fargier, H. Prade, “Fuzzy constraints in job-shop scheduling”, J. of Intelligent Manufacturing, 6, 1995, pp. 215–234.
G. Mauris, E. Benoit, L. Foulloy, “Fuzzy symbolic sensors: from concepts to applications”, Measurement, 12, 1994, pp. 357–384.
L. A. Zadeh, “Quantitative fuzzy semantics”, Information Sciences, 3, 1971, pp. 159–176.
L. Foulloy, S. Galichet, “Typology of fuzzy controllers”, in Theoretical Aspects of Fuzzy Control (H. T. Nguyen, M. Sugeno, R. Tang, R. R. Yager Eds), Wiley, 1995, pp. 65–90.
L. A. Zadeh, “Similarity relations and fuzzy orderings”, Information Sciences, 3, 1971, pp. 177–200.
R. Bellmann, L.A. Zadeh, “Decision-making in a fuzzy environment”, Management Science, 17, 1970, B-141 -B-164.
D. Dubois, H. Prade, “Weighted fuzzy pattern matching”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 28, 1988, pp. 313–331.
L. A. Zadeh, “Probability measures of fuzzy events”, J. Math. Anal.& Applicat., 23, 1968, pp.421–427.
D. Dubois, H. Prade, “A unifying view of comparison indices”, in fuzzy sets and possibility theory recent advances, R.R. Yager Ed, Pergamon press, 1982, pp. 3–13.
D. Dubois, H. Prade, S. Sandri, “On possibility / probability transformations”, in Fuzzy logic, R. Lowen and M. Roubens Eds, 1993, pp. 103–112.
D. Dubois, H. Prade, “A review of fuzzy set aggregation”, Information Sciences, 36, 1985, pp. 85–121.
R. R. Yager “Connectives and quantifiers in fuzzy sets”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 40, 1991, pp. 39 – 75.
M. Grabisch, “Fuzzy integral in multi-criteria decision making”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 69, 1995, pp. 279–298.
L. Berrah, G. Mauris, A. Haurat, L. Foulloy, “A fuzzy approach for the validation of performance assessment in ski quality control”, IPMU 96, Granada, Spain July 1996, pp. 623–628.
Rumbaugh J., Blaha M., Premerlani W., Eddy F., Lorensen W; Object-oriented modeling and design, Prentice Hall Ed.
MOPIC, Modélisation de la performance pour le pilotage à court terme d’un système de production, Research Project on Rhône-Alpes, 1994, France.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Berrah, L., Mauris, G., Foulloy, L., Haurat, A. (1998). Fuzzy Performance Indicators for the Control of Manufacturing Processes. In: Reznik, L., Dimitrov, V., Kacprzyk, J. (eds) Fuzzy Systems Design. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 17. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1885-7_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1885-7_14
Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-11811-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-7908-1885-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive