Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing ((STUDFUZZ,volume 26))

  • 179 Accesses

Abstract

The evolution of database systems was initially driven by the requirements of traditional data processing. The drawbacks of the network and hierarchical data model coupled with the need for a formally based database model, which clearly separate the physical and logical model led to the definition of the relational database model by Codd [7]. The initial reaction of IS community to the relational model was lukewarm, however the maturing of this technology led to general acceptance by the mid-80’s and almost universal usage in the 90’s. Indeed it is hard to conceive of any organization utilizing the older network and hierarchical data models today. This acceptance came about due to the phenomenal improvements in relational technology since its original definition by Codd. Software improvements took place in storage structures, retrieval algorithms, optimization techniques, parallel processing and user interface technologies. Simultaneously, hardware improvements in chip and data storage technology were taking place. This made it possible to efficiently store and retrieve terabytes of information using the relational data model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abiteboul,S., R. Hull, V. Vianu, “ Foundations of Databases”, Addison Wesley, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abiteboul, S. and R. Hull, “IFO: A Formal Semantic Database Model,” ACM Transactions on Database Systems, Vol 12, No. 4, December 1987, 525–565.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Bordogna, G., D. Lucarella, G. Pasi, “A Fuzzy Object-Oriented Data Model,” Proceedings of the IEEE 3rd International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, 313–318, (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bosc, P. and M. Galibourg and H. Hamon, “Fuzzy Querying With SQL: Extensions and Implementation Aspects,” Fuzzy Sets Systems, 28, 333–349, (1988).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Buckles, B. P. and F. E. Petry, “Uncertainty Models in Information and Database Systems”, Journal of Information Science 11 (1985), 77–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Buckles, B.P. and Petry, F.E., “A Fuzzy Representation of Data for Relational Database,” Fuzzy Sets Systems, 7, 213–226, (1982).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Codd, E,R., “A relational Model of Data for Large Shared Data Banks”, Comm. ACM 13(6), 377–387(1970).

    Google Scholar 

  8. De Caluwe, R., Fuzzy and Uncertain Object-Oriented Databases, World Scientific Pub. Co., 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dubois, D., H. Prade, J.P. Rossazza, “Vagueness, Typicality and Uncertainty in Class Hierarchies,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems, Vol. 6, 167–183, (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Elmasri, R. and S. B. Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Second Edition, ( Benjamin/Cummings, 1994 ).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Grant, J., “Null Values in a Relational Database,” Information Processing Letters, 6 (5), 156–157, (1977).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. George, R., F.E. Petry, and B.P. Buckles, “Modeling Class Hierarchies in the Fuzzy Object Oriented Data Model,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 60, 3, (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. George, R., R. Srikanth, F. E. Petry, and B. P. Buckles, “Uncertainty Management Issues in the Object-Oriented Data Model,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 4, No. 2, May 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hammer, M. and D. McLeod, “Database Description with SDM: A Semantic Database Model,”, ACM Transactions on Database Systems, Vol. 6, No. 3, Sept. 1981, 351–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Inoue, Y., S. Yamamoto, S. Yasunobu, “Fuzzy set object: fuzzy set as first-class object”. In IFSA ‘81 Conference Proceedings, Brussels, ( July 1991 ).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kacprzyk, J. and Ziolkowski, A., “Database Queries with Fuzzy Linguistic Quantifiers,” IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics, SMC-16, No: 3, 474–479, (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kershberg, L., Expert Database Systems, Proceedings from the 2nd int. Conf., (Benjamin/Cummings, 1989 ).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kifer, M. and J. Wu, A Logic Programming with Complex Objects, Journal of Computer and System Sciences 47 (1993) 77–120.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. M. Kifer, G. Lausen, “F-Logic: A Higher-Order Language for Reasoning about Objects, Inheritance, and Schema”, ACM SIGMOD May 89, pp. 134–146.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kim, W., and F.H. Lochovsky, eds., Object-Oriented Concepts, Databases and Applications, Addison-Wesley, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lipski, W. Jr.,“On Databases with Incomplete Information,” J. Assoc. Comput. Machinery, 28 (1), 41–70, (1981).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Petry, E. Frederick, Fuzzy Databases: Principles and Applications, Kluwer Academic Publishers, (1996).

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Prade, H. and C. Testemale, “Generalizing Database Relational Algebra for the Treatment of Incomplete or Uncertain Information and Vague Queries,” Information Sciences, 34, pp 115–143 (1984).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Rossazza, J-P., D. Dubois, H. Prade, “A Hierarchical Model of Fuzzy Classes,” in Fuzzy and Uncertain Object-Oriented Databases: Concepts and Models, ed. Rita de Caluwe, World Scientific, Singapore, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Thomas,S.J. and P.C. Fischer, “Nested Relational Structures, ”Advances in Computing Research 3“, JAI Press, 269–307.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ullman, J. D. and C. Zaniolo, Deductive Databases: Achievements and Future Directions, SIGMOD RECORD 19 (1990) 75–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Van Gyseghem, N., R. De. Caluwe, R.Vandenberghe, “UFO: Uncertainty and Fuzziness in an Object-Oriented Model,” Proceedings of the FUZZ-IEEE’93, USA, 773–778, (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Yazici, A., B.P. Buckles and F.E. Petry, “A Semantic Data Model Approach to Knowledge-Intensive Applications,” International Journal of Expert Systems: Research and Applications, Vol. 8 (1), 77–91, (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yazici, A., M. Koyuncu, “Fuzzy Object-Oriented Database Modeling Coupled with Fuzzy Logic”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 89, 1–26, (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yazici, A. and D. Cibiceli, “An Index Structure for Fuzzy Databases” The Proceedings of the Fifth IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, 1375–1381, New Orleans, USA, (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Yazici, A. and M.I. Sozat, “The Integrity Constraints for Similarity-Based Fuzzy Relational Databases,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems (to appear).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Yazici, A. and O. Merdan, “Verification and Transformation of Complex and Uncertain Conceptual Schemas”, International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, Vol. 5 /6, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Yazici A., George R., Aksoy D., “Extending the Similarity-Based Fuzzy Object-Oriented Data Model”, Information Sciences (International Journal) (to appear).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Yazici, A., “Complex data and Fuzziness in Database Applications,” Advanced Manufacturing Forum, the Special Issue on Applications of Artificial Intelligence: Expert Systems, Robots and Vision Systems, Fuzzy Logic and Neural Networks, Vol.1 (1996), pp: 217–228.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Zadeh, L.A., “Fuzzy Sets,” Information and Control, Vol.8, N.Y., Academic Press, 338–353, (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Zadeh L.A., “Similarity Relations and Fuzzy Orderings,” Information Sciences, 3, 177–200, (1971).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Zadeh, L.A. and J. Kacprzyk, Fuzzy Logic for Management of Uncertainty, Eds. John Wiley and Sons Inc., 607–644, New York, (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Zadeh, L.A., “A Fuzzy-Set-Theoretic Interpretation of Linguistic Hedges,” J. Cybem, 2, 4–34, (1972).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  39. M. Zemankova-Leech, and A.Kandel, “Implementing Imprecision in Information Systems,” Information Sciences, 37, pp 107–141 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Zicari, R., “Incomplete Information in Object-OrientedDatabases” SIGMOD Record, Vol. 19 (3), Sept. 1990, 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Zvieli,A., P.P. Chen,“Entity-Relationship Modelling and Fuzzy Databases,” Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Data Engineering, Los Angeles, USA, Feb. 1986, 320–327.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Yazici, A., George, R. (1999). Introduction. In: Fuzzy Database Modeling. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 26. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1880-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1880-2_1

  • Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-11809-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7908-1880-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics