Advertisement

Performing Approximate Reasoning with Words?

  • Didier Dubois
  • Laurent Foulloy
  • Sylvie Galichet
  • Henri Prade
Part of the Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing book series (STUDFUZZ, volume 33)

Abstract

When defining a term set as a (mite family of fuzzy sets on a universe of discourse, two description levels are introduced: the level of the referential and the level corresponding to the symbolic term set. Depending on the level which is privileged, two different views of reasoning with fuzzy set labels can be thought of: Zadeh’s view of approximate reasoning which takes place at the level of the universe of discourse, and another view where fuzzy sets are manipulated in a more symbolic way at the term set level, which would corresponds to the idea of computing with words recently advocated by Zadeh also. The two views are contrasted in this paper, and their differences are laid bare.

Keywords

Membership Function Fuzzy Rule Fuzzy Relation Disjunctive Normal Form Approximate Reasoning 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Di Nola A., Pedrycz W., Sessa S. (1989) An aspect of discrepancy in the implementation of modus ponens in the presebce of fuzzy quantities. Int. J. of Approximate Reasoning 3, 259–265.Google Scholar
  2. Dubois D., Foulloy L., Galichet S., Prade H. (1997) Two different views of approximate reasoning. Proc. of the 7th Inter. Fuzzy Systems Assoc. World Congress (IFSA’97), Prague, Czech Republic, June 25–29, 1997, Academia, Prague, 238–242.Google Scholar
  3. Dubois D., Martin-Clouaire R., Prade H. (1988) Practical computing in fuzzy logic. In: Fuzzy Computing ( M. M. Gupta, T. Yamakawa; Eds), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 11–34.Google Scholar
  4. Dubois D., Prade H. (1991) Fuzzy sets in approximate reasoning — Part 1: Inference with possibility distributions. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 40, 143–202.Google Scholar
  5. Dubois D., Prade H. (1992a) Upper and lower images of a fuzzy set induced by a fuzzy relation: Applications to fuzzy inference and diagnosis. Information Sciences, 64, 203–232.Google Scholar
  6. Dubois D., Prade H. (1992b) Putting rough sets and fuzzy sets together. In: Intelligent Decision Support — Handbook of Applications and Advances of the Rough Sets Theory ( R. Slowinski, ed.), Kluwer Academic Publ., Dordrecht, 203–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dubois D., Lang J., Prade H. (1994) Automated reasoning using possibilistic logic: semantics, belief revision and variable certainty weights. IEEE Trans. on Data and Knowledge Engineering, 6 (1), 64–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dubois D., Prade H. (1996) What are fuzzy rules and how to use them. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 84, 169–185.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Foulloy L., Galichet S. (1994) Typology of fuzzy controllers. In: Theorical Aspects of Fuzzy Control ( H.T. Nguyen, M. Sugeno, R. Tong, R.R. Yager, eds.), Wiley, New-York, 65–90.Google Scholar
  10. Hajek D. (1995) Fuzzy logic as logic. In Mathematical Models for Handling Partial Knowledge in Artificial Intelligence ( G. Coletti, D. Dubois, R. Scozzafava Eds.) Plenum Press, New York, 21–30.Google Scholar
  11. Mauris G., Benoit E., Foulloy L. (1994) Fuzzy symbolic sensors: From concept to applications. Int. J. of Measurement, 12, 357–384.Google Scholar
  12. Ughetto L., Dubois D., Prade H. (1997) Efficient inference procedures with fuzzy inputs. Proc. of the 6th IEEE Inter. Conf. on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE’97), Barcelona, Spain, July 1–5, 567–572.Google Scholar
  13. Willaeys D., Malvache N. (1981) The use of fuzzy sets for the treatment of fuzzy information by computer. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 5, 323–328.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Zadeh L.A. (1971) Quantitative fuzzy semantics. Information Sciences, 3 159–176.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Zadeh L.A. (1973) Outline of a new approach to the analysis of complex systems and decision processes. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 3, 28–44.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Zadeh L.A. (1979) A theory of approximate reasoning. In: Machine Intelligence, Vol. 9 ( J.E. Hayes, D. Michie, L.I. Mikulich, eds.), Elsevier, New York, 149–194.Google Scholar
  17. Zadeh L.A. (1996) Fuzzy logic = computing the words. IEEE Trans. on Fuzzy Systems, 4 (2), 103–111.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Didier Dubois
    • 1
  • Laurent Foulloy
    • 2
  • Sylvie Galichet
    • 2
  • Henri Prade
    • 1
  1. 1.IRITUniversité Paul SabatierToulouse Cedex 04France
  2. 2.LAMII — CESALPUniversité de SavoieAnnecy CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations