Skip to main content

Self-Organizing Maps for Representing Structures

  • Conference paper
Book cover The State of the Art in Computational Intelligence

Part of the book series: Advances in Soft Computing ((AINSC,volume 5))

  • 219 Accesses

Abstract

We propose a novel neural network model for representing data structures. The model consists of a hierarchy of Self-Organizing Maps (SOMs) equipped with leaky integrating units. Each of the maps is thus designed to represent sequences of data in a fashion resembling Barnsley’s iterated function system. Each data structure is decomposed into a hierarchy of sequences where in all but the lowest levels a special symbol is substituted to represent corresponding subtrees. The advantage of this representation is that it is directly computable, and if neurally implemented using SOMs, it is computationally unexpensive. Preliminary simulations using simple symbolic tree structures demonstrate that obtained representations have the required property of systematic order.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J.A. Fodor and Z.W. Pylyshyn. Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis. Cognition, 28: 3–71, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. J.B. Pollack. Recursive distributed representations. Artificial Intelligence, 46 (12): 77–105, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. P. Smolensky. Tensor product variable binding and the representation of symbolic structures in connectionist systems. Artif. Intelligence, 46: 159–216, 1990.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. T. Plate. Holographic reduced representations. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks6(3):623–641, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  5. L. Shastri and V. Ajjanagadde. From simple associations to systematic reasoning. Behavioral nad Brain Sciences, 16 (3): 417–494, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. J.E. Hummel and K.J. Holyoak. Distributed representations of structure: a theory of analogical access and mapping. Psych. Review, 104 (3): 427–466, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. D.J. James and R. Miikkulainen. Sardnet: a self-organizing feature map for sequences. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 7, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  8. K. Kopecz. Unsupervised learning of sequences on maps with lateral connectivity. In ICANN’95, pages 431–436, Paris, France, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. Göppert and W. Rosenstiel. Dynamic extensions of self-organizing maps. InProceedings of ICANN’94pages 330–333, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  10. G.J. Chappell and J.G. Taylor. The temporal Kohonen map.Neural Networks6:441–445, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  11. T. Koskela et al. Time series prediction using recurrent SOM with local linear models. Int. Journal of Knowledge-Based Intell. Eng. Systems, 2: 60–68, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Barnsley. Fractals Everywhere. Academic Press, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  13. I. Farkas. Invariance of gaussian-vector mapping using a self-organizing map.Neural Network World7(2):153–159, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  14. L. Niklasson and M. Bodén. Representing structure and structured representations in connectionist networks. In A. Browne, editor, Neural Network Perspectives on Cognition and Adaptive Robotics, pages 20–50. IOP Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  15. P. Tino. Spatial representation of symbolic sequences through iterated function systems. IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 29 (4): 386–392, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  16. T. Kohonen. Self-organizing maps of symbol strings. Technical report A42Helsinki University of Technology, Espoo, Finland, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  17. N.E. Sharkey Connectionist representation techniques.Artificial Intelligence Review5:143–167, 1990

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Farkaš, I. (2000). Self-Organizing Maps for Representing Structures. In: Sinčák, P., Vaščák, J., Kvasnička, V., Mesiar, R. (eds) The State of the Art in Computational Intelligence. Advances in Soft Computing, vol 5. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1844-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1844-4_5

  • Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-1322-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7908-1844-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics