Skip to main content

Finding Successful Queries in a Mediator Context

  • Conference paper
Flexible Query Answering Systems

Part of the book series: Advances in Soft Computing ((AINSC,volume 7))

  • 145 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper, we study failing queries posed to a mediator in an information integration system and expressed in the logical formalism of the information integration system PICSEL1. First, we present the notion of concept generalisation in a concept hierarchy that is used to repair failing queries. Then, we address two problems arising while rewriting a query using views. The first problem concerns queries that cannot be rewritten due to a lack of sources, the second one concerns queries that have only unsatisfiable rewritings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Y. Arens, C. A. Knoblock and W.-M. Shen. Query reformulation for dynamic information integration. J. Intelligent Information System, 6, 96.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Bidault, C. Froidevaux and B. Safar. Repairing Queries in a Mediator Approach. ECAI 2000, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chang and Lee. Symbolic Logic and Mechanical Theorem Proving, 100–121, Academic Press, 73.

    Google Scholar 

  4. L. Cholvy Answering queries addressed to a group of deductive databases. In Workshop on Flexible Query-Answering Systems, Danemark, May 96.

    Google Scholar 

  5. L. Cholvy and R. Demolombe Querying a Rule Base. In Expert Database Systems, Larry Kerschberg Editor, 477–485, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  6. W. Chu and Q. Chen. A Structured Approach for Cooperative Query Answering. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering,6(5):738–749, October 94.

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. Chawathe, H. Garcia-Molina, J. Hammer, K. Ireland, Y. Papakonstantinou, J. Ullman, and J. Widom. The TSIMMIS project: Integration of heterogenous information sources. In Proceedings of IPSJ, Tokyo, October 94.

    Google Scholar 

  8. T. Gaasterland, P. Godfrey and J. Minker. Relaxation as a Platform of Cooperative Answering. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems,Vol. 1, No: 3/4, 293–321, December 92.

    Google Scholar 

  9. T. Gaasterland. Cooperative Answering through Controlled Query Relaxation. IEEE Expert,48–59, Sept-Oct 97.

    Google Scholar 

  10. T. Gaasterland, P. Godfrey, and J. Minker. An overview of Cooperative Answering. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, (1) 123–157, 92.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. Gal. Cooperative Responses in Deductive Databases. PhD thesis, Departement of Computer Science, University of Maryland,88.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. R. Genesereth, A. M. Keller, and O. M. Duschka. Infomaster: An information integration system. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, SIGMOD-97,97.

    Google Scholar 

  13. E Goasdoué, V. Lattes and M.-C. Rousset. The Use of CARIN Language and Algorithms for Information Integration: The PICSEL Project. In Int. J. of Cooperative Information Syst. 99.

    Google Scholar 

  14. P. Godfrey. Minimization in cooperative response to failing databases queries. Int. J. of Cooperative Information Syst. 6(2): 95–149, 97.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. Levy, A. Rajamaran, J. Ordille. Query-answering algorithms for information agents. Proc AAAI’96,40–47.

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Levy and M.-C. Rousset. Combining Horn Rules and Description Logics in CARIN. Artificial Intelligence, 104, 165–209, 98.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. Minker. An overview of Cooperative Answering in Databases In Proc FQAS’98,282–285, May 98.

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. Motro. Intensional Answers to Database Queries. IEEE,6(3), 444–454, June 94.

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. Motro. Flex: A tolerant and cooperative user interface to databases. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering,2(2):231–246, June 90.

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. Pirotte, Dominique Roelants and Esteban Zimanyi Controlled Generation of Intensional Answers IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering,3(2):221–236, June 91.

    Google Scholar 

  21. C. Rouveirol. Flattering and Saturation: Two Representation Changes for Generalization. Machine Learning, 14, 219–232, 94.

    Google Scholar 

  22. M. Sebag and C. Rouveirol. Induction of Maximally General Clauses Consistent with Integrity Constraints. Proc 4th Int. Workshop on Inductive Logic Programming,195–215, ILP-94.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bidault, A., Froidevaux, C., Safar, B. (2001). Finding Successful Queries in a Mediator Context. In: Larsen, H.L., Andreasen, T., Christiansen, H., Kacprzyk, J., Zadrożny, S. (eds) Flexible Query Answering Systems. Advances in Soft Computing, vol 7. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1834-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1834-5_4

  • Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-1347-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7908-1834-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics