Skip to main content

Word Recognition Errors and Relevance Feedback in Spoken Query Processing

  • Conference paper
Flexible Query Answering Systems

Part of the book series: Advances in Soft Computing ((AINSC,volume 7))

Abstract

Given the typical length of queries submitted to Information Retrieval systems, it is easy to imagine that the effects of word recognition errors (WRE) in spoken queries must be severely destructive on the system’s effectiveness. The effects of word recognition errors in Spoken Document Retrieval have been well studied and well reported in recent Information Retrieval literature, but much less experimental work has been devoted to studying the effects of word recognition errors in Spoken Query Processing (SQP). The experimental work reported in this paper shows that the use of classical IR techniques for SQP is quite robust to considerably high levels of WRE, in particular for long queries. Moreover, in the case of short queries, both standard relevance feedback and pseudo relevance feedback can be effectively employed to improve the effectiveness of SQP.

Most of the work reported in this paper was carried out while the author was at the International Computer Science Institute, Berkeley, CA, USA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barnett, J., Anderson, S., Broglio, J., Singh, M., Hudson, R., and Kuo, S. (1997). Experiments in spoken queries for document retrieval. In Eurospeech 97, volume 3, pages 1323–1326, Rodhes, Greece.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Crestani, F. (1999a). An experimental study of the effects of word recognition errors in spoken queries on the effectiveness of an information retrieval system. Technical Report TR-99–016, International Computer Science Institute, Berkeley, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Crestani, F. (1999b). Vocal access to a newspaper archive: design issues and preliminary investigation. In Proceedings of ACM Digital Libraries, pages 59–68, Berkeley, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Crestani, 2000) Crestani, F. (2000). Combination of semantic and phonetic term similarity for spoken document retrieval and spoken query processing. In Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems (IPMU),Madrid, Spain. In press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Frakes, W. and Baeza-Yates, R., editors (1992). Information Retrieval: data structures and algorithms. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Garofolo, J., Voorhees, E., Auzanne, C., Stanford, V., and Lund, B. (1998). 1998 TREC-7 spoken document retrieval track overview and results. In Proceedings of the TREC Conference, pages 79–90, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Harman, D. (1992a). Ranking algorithms. In Frakes, W. and Baeza-Yates, R., editors, Information Retrieval: data structures and algorithms, chapter 14. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Harman, D. (1992b). Relevance feedback and other query modification techniques. In Frakes, W. and Baeza-Yates, R., editors, Information Retrieval: data structures and algorithms, chapter 11. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Keller, E., editor (1994). Fundamentals of Speech Synthesis and Speech Recognition. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Porter, M. (1980). An algorithm for suffix stripping. Program, 14 (3): 130–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Robertson, S. and Spark Jones, K. (1997). Simple, proven approaches to text retrieval. Technical Report TR356, Computer Laboratory, University of Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sanderson, M. (1996). Word Sense Disambiguation and Information Retrieval. PhD Thesis, Department of Computing Science, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Singhal, A., Choi, J., Hindle, D., Lewis, D., and Pereira, F. (1998). ATandT at TREC-7. In Proceedings of the TREC Conference, pages 239253, Washington DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Singhal, A. and Pereira, F. (1999). Document expansion for speech retrieval. In Proceedings of ACM SIGIR, pages 34–41, Berkeley, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Voorhees, E. (1993). On expanding query vectors with lexically related words. In Proceedings of the TREC Conference, pages 223–232, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Voorhees, E. and harman, D. (1998). Overview of the seventh text retrieval conference (TREC-7). In Proceedings of the TREC Conference, pages 1–24, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Crestani, F. (2001). Word Recognition Errors and Relevance Feedback in Spoken Query Processing. In: Larsen, H.L., Andreasen, T., Christiansen, H., Kacprzyk, J., Zadrożny, S. (eds) Flexible Query Answering Systems. Advances in Soft Computing, vol 7. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1834-5_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1834-5_25

  • Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-1347-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7908-1834-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics