A First View on the Alternatives of Fuzzy Set Theory
During many centuries probability theory and error calculus have been the only models to treat imprecision and uncertainty. In the past three decennia however a lot of new models have been introduced for handling incomplete information. Undoubtly fuzzy set theory initiated by Zadeh  in 1965 plays the central role. Besides this widely applied theory, many other models pretending to be competitive with fuzzy set theory have been launched: rough set theory, flou set theory, L-flou set theory, intuitionistic set theory ... Allthough we are convinced that freedom and openness in research has be be respected in a degree as large as possible we will warn for increasing the number of alternatives to a degree that introduces confusion and hence diminishes the trust in our models, especially for new practitioners. As I already mentioned in a previous paper , time has come to clean up the existing material, to summarize the relevant theoretical models and indicate their relevance by means of convicting concrete examples, by which I do not mean the stipulation in a superficial way of some possible areas of application but indeed the description of real situations and the solution of real problems. In this talk we will focuss on several alternative theories and try to indicate their mutual relationships and their relationships to earlier existing mathematical models.
We will start with a short overview of the basic operations on the class of fuzzy sets and indicate the loss of structure (in this case a Kleene algebra) comparing to the Boolean algebra of (crisp) set theory. Secondly we will briefly outline Goguen’s  extension to L-fuzzy set theory where L denotes a complete lattice. Next we will introduce the structure of Gentilhomme’s flou set theory as well as its extension to n-flou sets and L-flou sets as given by Negoïta and Ralescu . In the last model L denotes a complete lattice satisfying some supplementary condition (L): (L)(8A L)(8a 2 L)(a < supA) (9b 2 A)(a b)) For an extensive treatment of such lattices, the so-called kite-tail lattices, we refer to . The sixth model that will presented is the theory of twofold fuzzy sets as introduced by Dubois and Prade  in 1987. Finally Pawlak’s  rough set theory will be briefly described.
Fuzzy set theory is an extension of flou set theory.
L-fuzzy set theory is equivalent to L-flou set theory for L a complete lattice satisfying the supplementary condition (L).
f0, lg-flou set theory is equivalent to set theory.
f0, ½, lg-flou set theory is equivalent to flou set theory.
[0, 1]-flou set theory is equivalent to fuzzy set theory.
Twofold fuzzy set theory extends flou set theory.
Twofold fuzzy set theory is equivalent to fuzzy set theory.
Flou set theory extends rough set theory.
KeywordsComplete Lattice Surjective Homomorphism Triangular Norm Fuzzy Topological Space Fuzzy Predicate
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Y. Gentilhomme, Les sous-ensembles flous en linguistique, Cahiers de Linguistiques Théoriques et Appliquée V (1968) 47–63.Google Scholar
- D. Dubois, H. Prade, Twofold fuzzy sets and rough sets, some issues in knowledge representation, Fuzzy Sets and Systems (1987) 3–18.Google Scholar
- L.A. Zadeh, Is probability theory sufficient for dealing with uncertainty in A. I.: a negative view. In: Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, L.N. Kanal, J.F. Lemmer (eds.), Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.(1986) 103116.Google Scholar
- D. Guinan, K. Streicher, E.E. Kerre, Set-theoretic properties of the class of fuzzy sets endowed with the bounded sum and the bold intersection. University of Nebraska, Dep. Comp. Sc. and Eng., Report Series, n° 114 (1990), 54 pages.Google Scholar
- E.E. Kerre, Basic principles of fuzzy set theory for the representation and manipulation of imprecision and uncertainty. In: Introduction to the Basic Principles of Fuzzy Set Theory and some of its Applications, E.E. Kerre, ed., Communication and Cognition, Gent, second revised edition (1993) 1–158.Google Scholar
- B. De Baets, E. Kerre, A revision of Bandler - Kohout compositions of relations, Mathematica Pannonica 4/1 (1993) 59–78.Google Scholar