Abstract
Chaos offers several advantages to the Engineer over other non-chaotic dynamics. One is that chaotic systems are often significantly easier to control than other linear or non-linear systems, requiring only small, appropriately timed perturbations to constrain them within specific Unstable Periodic Orbits (UPOs). Another is that chaotic attractors contain an infinite number of these UPOs. If individual UPOs can be made to represent specific internal states of a system, then a chaotic attractor can be turned into an infinite state machine. In this paper we investigate this possibility with respect to chaotic neural networks. We present a method by which a network can self-select UPOs in response to specific input values. These UPOs correspond to network recognition states for these input values.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ditto, W.L., Rauseo, S.N. and Spano, M.L. (1990). Experimental control of chaos. Physical Review Letters 65, 3211–3214.
Freeman, W.J. (1985). Strange attractors in the olfactory system of rabbits. Electroencephalography And Clinical Neurophysiology 61, 5155–5155
Freeman, W.J. (1994). Neural networks and chaos. J.Theor.Biol. 171, 13–18.
Garfinkel, A., Spano, M.L., Ditto, W.L. and Weiss, J.N. (1992). Controlling cardiac chaos. Science 257, 1230–1235.
Guevara, M.R., Glass, L., Mackey, M.C. and Shrier, A. (1983). Chaos in neurobiology. IEEE Transactions on systems, man and cybernetics SMC-13, 790–798.
Hebb, D.O. (1948). The Organization of Behaviour: A Neurophysiological Theory,John Wileym New York.
Kittel, A., Popp, M., Parisi, J. and Pyragas, K. (1996) Control of Chaos by Self-Adapted Delayed Feedback. Lect. Notes Phys. 976: 239 — 247.
Lorenz, E.N. (1963). Deterministic nonperiodic flow. J. Atmos. Sci. 20, 130–41.
Lourenco C. and Babloyantz A. (1996). Control of spatiotemporal chaos in neuronal networks. Int.J.Neural Syst. 7, 507–517.
Olde Scheper, T. (1995) Application of Chaos analysis on patient EEG. 1995. University of Utrecht. 9–30–1995. Ref Type: Thesis/Dissertation
Pyragas, K. (1992). Continuous control of chaos by self-controlling feedback. Phys. Lett., 170A, 421–428.
Rössler, O.E. (1976). Phys. Lett. A 57397.
Shinbrot, T., Ditto, W.L., Grebogi, C., Ott, E., Spano, M.L. and Yorke, J.A. (1992). Using the sensitive dependence of chaos (the “butterfly effect”) to direct trajectories in an experimental chaotic system. Physical Review Letters 68, 2863–2866.
Shinbrot, T., Grebogi, C., Ott, E. and Yorke, J.A. (1993). Using small perturbations to control chaos. Nature 363, 411–417.
Tsuda, I., Koerner, E. and Shimizu, H. (1987). Memory dynamics in asynchronous neural networks. Progress Of Theoretical Physics 78, 51–71.
Tsuda, I. (1992). Dynamic link of memory - chaotic memory map in nonequilibrium neural networks. Neural Networks 5, 313–326.s
Tsuda, I. (1996). A new-type of self-organization associated with chaotic dynamics in neural networks. International Journal Of Neural Systems 7, 451–459.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Crook, N., Scheper, T.O. (2001). Dynamic Recognition States for Chaotic Neural Networks. In: John, R., Birkenhead, R. (eds) Developments in Soft Computing. Advances in Soft Computing, vol 9. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1829-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1829-1_8
Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-1361-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-7908-1829-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive