Skip to main content

Connections Between Cylindric Algebras and Relation Algebras

  • Chapter
Relational Methods for Computer Science Applications

Part of the book series: Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing ((STUDFUZZ,volume 65))

  • 151 Accesses

Abstract

We investigate the class SRaCA n for 4 ≤ n < ω and survey some recent results. We see that RA n — the subalgebras of relation algebras with relational bases — is too weak, and that the class of relation algebras whose canonical extension has an n-dimensional cylindric basis is too strong to define the class. We introduce the notion of an n-dimensional hyperbasis and show that for any relation algebra A the canonical extension A + has such a hyperbasis if and only if A ∈ SRaCA n .

We introduce techniques that can be used to show that the hierarchies RA4 ⊃ RA5 ⊃... and SRaCA4 ⊃ SRaCA5 ⊃... are strict and each step is not finitely axiomatisable.

We outline a relativized semantics that characterises RA n and another one for the class of subalgebras of relation algebras with n-dimensional cylindric bases.

Research of first author partially supported by UK EPSRC grant GR/L85961

Research of second author partially supported by UK EPSRC grants GR/K54946 and GR/L85978.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andréka H., Monk J.D. and Németi I. (1991) Algebraic Logic. Colloq. Math. Soc. J. Bolyai. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1991. Conference Proceedings, Budapest, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hirsch R. and Hodkinson I. (1997) Step by step — building representations in algebraic logic. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 62(1):225–279, March

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Hirsch R. and Hodkinson I. (1998) Relation algebras with n-dimensional bases. submitted to Annals of Pure and Applied Logic

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hirsch R. and Hodkinson I. (1999) Relation algebras from cylindric algebras, I. Submitted to the Annals of Pure and Applied Logic

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hirsch R. and Hodkinson I. (1999) Relation algebras from cylindric algebras, II. Submitted to the Annals of Pure and Applied Logic

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hirsch R., Hodkinson I. and Maddux R. (1998) On the number of variables required in proofs. in preparation

    Google Scholar 

  7. Henkin L., Monk J.D. and Tarski A. (1971) Cylindric Algebras Part I. NorthHolland

    Google Scholar 

  8. Henkin L., Monk J.D. and Tarski A. (1985) Cylindric Algebras Part II. NorthHolland

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Lyndon R. (1950) The representation of relational algebras. Annals of Mathematics, 51(3):707–729

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Lyndon R. (1961) Relation algebras and projective geometries. Michigan Mathematics Journal, 8:207–210

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Maddux R. (1978) Topics in Relation Algebra. PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  12. Maddux R. (1992) Relation algebras of every dimension. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 57(4):1213–1229

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Monk J.D. (1964) On representable relation algebras. Michigan Mathematics Journal, 11:207–210

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Stone M. (1936) The theory of representations for boolean algebras. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 40:37–111

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Tarski A. and Givant S.R. (1987) A Formalization of Set Theory Without Variables. Number 41 in Colloquium Publications in Mathematics. American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island

    Google Scholar 

  16. Thompson R. (1993) Complete description of substitutions in cylindric algebras and other algebraic logics. In: Rauszer C. (Ed.) Algebraic methods in logic and in computer science, 28:327–342. Banach Center publications, Institute of mathematics, Polish Academy of Sciences

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hirsch, R., Hodkinson, I. (2001). Connections Between Cylindric Algebras and Relation Algebras. In: Orłowska, E., Szałas, A. (eds) Relational Methods for Computer Science Applications. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 65. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1828-4_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1828-4_14

  • Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-00362-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7908-1828-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics