Skip to main content

Taking One Step Forward in Reservoir Characterization Using Artificial Neural Networks

  • Chapter
Book cover Soft Computing for Reservoir Characterization and Modeling

Part of the book series: Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing ((STUDFUZZ,volume 80))

  • 642 Accesses

Abstract

Reservoir characterization is usually a long and costly process. Engineers, geologists and geophysicists use many different methodologies to characterize the hydrocarbon reservoirs. The conventional reservoir characterization studies normally involve a series of data collection and interpretation processes that can be cost prohibitive. This chapter reviews a collection of methods developed by the author over several years in order to generate a better understanding of reservoir characteristics only using the available data. These methodologies were developed using artificial neural networks and dates back to early 1990s. In this collection of studies, the types of data used for reservoir characterization are wireline logs, core data, and magnetic resonance logs. The outcomes of the reservoir characterization studies using the tools being introduced here are effective porosity, fluid saturation and formation permeability. Based on the amount and the quality of the available data one or more of the aforementioned reservoir properties can be characterized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 179.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 229.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Mohaghegh, S., Goddard, C., Popa, A., Ameri, S., and Bhuiyan, M. 2000: “Reservoir Characterization Through Synthetic Logs”, SPE 65675, Proceedings, 2000 SPE Eastern Regional Conference and Exhibition, October 17–19, Morgantown, West Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mohaghegh, S., Koperna, G., Popa, A. S. and Hill, D. G. 1999: “Reducing the Cost of FieldScale Log Analysis Using Virtual Intelligence Techniques”, SPE 57454, Proceedings, 1999 SPE Eastern Regional Conference and Exhibition, October 21–22, Charleston, West Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Archie, G. E.:“The Electrical Resistivity Log as an Aid in Determining Some Reservoir Characteristics,” Trans., AIMS, 1942, Vol.146, No. 1, pp. 54–62

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tixier, M.P.: “Evaluation of Permeability From Electric-Log Resistivity Gradients,” Oil & Gas Journal, (June 1949), pp. 113.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wyllie, M.R.J. and Rose, W.D.: “Some Theoretical Considerations Related to the Quantitative Evaluation of the Physical Characteristics of Reservoir Rock from Electric Log Data,” Trans., AIME, Vol. 189, (1950), pp. 105.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pirson, S.J.: “Handbook of Well Log Analysis,” Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall, Inc., (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Timur, A.: “An Investigation of Permeability, Porosity, and Residual Water Saturation Relationship for Sandstone Reservoirs,” The Log Analyst, Vol. 9, No. 4, (July-August 1968), pp. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Coats, G.R. and Dumanoir, J.L.: “A New Approach to Improved Log-Derived Permeability,” The Log Analyst, (January-February 1974), pp. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Schlumberger Ltd.: “Log Interpretation Charts,” Houston, Texas, (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kapadia, S.P. and Menzie, U.: “Determination of Permeability Variation Factor V From Log Analysis,” SPE 14402, Annual Technical Conference, Las Vegas, NV, (September 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bloch, S.: “Empirical Prediction of Porosity and Permeability in Sandstones,” AAPG Bulletin, Vol. 75, No. 7, (July 1991), pp. 1145.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ahmed, U., Crary, S.F., Coates, G.R.: “Permeability Estimation: The Various Sources and Their Interrelationships,” JPT, (May 1991), pp. 578.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wendt, W.A., Sakurai, S., Nelson, P.H.: “Permeability Prediction From Well Logs Using Multiple Regression,” in Lake, L.W. and Caroll, H.B.,Jr..,editors: “Reservoir Characterization,” Academic Press, New York, (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Draper, N.R., Smith, H.: “Applied Regression Analysis,” Wiley, (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dubrule, O., Haldorsen, H.H.: “Geostatistics for Permeability Estimation,” in Lake, L.W. and Caroll, H.B.,Jr.,editors: “Reservoir Characterization,” Academic Press, New York, (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Osborne, D.A.: “Permeability Estimation Using a Neural Network: A Case Study from The Roberts Unit, Wasson Field, Yoakum County, Texas,” AAPG South West Section Transactions, 1992, pp. 125–132.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mohaghegh, S., Reza, A., Ameri, S., Rose, D.: “Design and Development of An Artificial Neural Network for Estimation of Formation Permeability,” SPE 28237, SPE Petroleum Computer Conference, Dallas, Texas,(August 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Balan, B., Mohaghegh, S., and Ameri, S., “State-of-the-art in Permeability Determination From Well Log Data, Part 1: A Comparative Study, Model Development,” SPE 30978, Proceedings, SPE Eastern Regional Conference and Exhibition, September 1921, 1995, Morgantown, WV.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mohaghegh, S., Balan, B., and Ameri, S., “State-of-the-art in Permeability Determination From Well Log Data, Part 2: Verifiable, Accurate Permeability Predictions, the Touch Stone of All Models,” SPE 30979, Proceedings, SPE Eastern Regional Conference and Exhibition, September 19–21, 1995, Morgantown, West Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mohaghegh, S., Balan, B., and Ameri, S.:“Determination of Permeability From Well Log Data.” SPE Formation Evaluation Journal, September 1997, pp 170–174.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mohaghegh, S., Arefi, G., and Ameri, S.:“Virtual Measurement of Heterogeneous Formation Permeability Using Geophysical Well Log Responses.” The Log Analyst, A Journal of Formation Evaluation and Reservoir Description, Society of Professional Well Log Analysts, March-April, 1996, pp 32–39.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Doveton, J. H.: “Geological Log Analysis Using Computer Methods,” AAPG Computer Applications in Geology, 1994, No. 2, AAPG, Tulsa, 169 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Aminian, K.: “Characterization of a Complex Resrvoir in West Virginia,” SPE 26939, Eastern Regional Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, (November 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Molnar, D., Aminian, K., Ameri, S.: “The Use of Well Log Data for Permeability Estimation in a Heterogeneous Reservoir,” SPE 29175, Eastern Regional Conference, Charleston, WV, (November 1994)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Donaldson, A., et al.: “The Fluvial-Deltaic Big Injun Sandstone in West Virginia,” Final Report, DOE/BC/14657–15, Bartlesville Project Office, USDOE, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mohaghegh, S., Balan, B., and Ameri, S., “State-of-the-art in Permeability Determination From Well Log Data, Part 2: Verifiable, Accurate Permeability Predictions, the Touch Stone of All Models,” SPE 30979, Proceedings, SPE Eastern Regional Conference and Exhibition, September 19–21, 1995, Morgantown, West Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Austin, J., and Faulkner, T.: “Magnetic Resonance Imaging Log Evaluates LowResistivity Pay”, The American Oil & Gas Reporter, August 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mohaghegh, S., Richardson, M., Ameri, S. 1998: “Virtual magnetic Resonance Imaging Logs: Generation of Synthetic MRI logs from Conventional Well Logs”, SPE 51075, Proceedings, 1998 SPE Eastern Regional Conference and Exhibition, November 9–11, Pittsburgh, PA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mohaghegh, S. (2002). Taking One Step Forward in Reservoir Characterization Using Artificial Neural Networks. In: Wong, P., Aminzadeh, F., Nikravesh, M. (eds) Soft Computing for Reservoir Characterization and Modeling. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 80. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1807-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1807-9_7

  • Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-2495-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7908-1807-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics