Skip to main content

Sources, Measurements and Models of Type 2 Fuzziness in the New Millennium

  • Conference paper
Fuzzy Logic

Part of the book series: Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing ((STUDFUZZ,volume 81))

  • 525 Accesses

Abstract

There are two main sources of Type 2 fuzziness: (1) the acquisition of membership functions for linguistic values of linguistic variables, and (2) the combination of linguistic values with linguistic operators. First, it has been shown that acquisition of membership functions, whether (1) they are obtained by subjective measurement experiments, such as direct or reverse rating procedures or else (2) they are obtained with the application of fuzzy clustering methods, they all reveal a scatter plot, which ought to be captured with Type 2 membership functions. Type 1 membership functions are a result of reducing the information content and uncertainty embedded within scatter points via curve fitting or averaging techniques, which ignore the spread and hence, the content and uncertainty embedded within scatter points. Type 2 fuzziness can be represented either with interval-valued Type 2 or with “full” Type 2 membership functions, which specify gradations between the upper and lower bounds of the interval of the spread. Secondly, it has been shown that the combination of linguistic values with linguistic operators, “AND”, “OR”, “IMP”, etc., as opposed to crisp connectives that are known as t-norms and t-conorms and standard negation, lead to the generation of Fuzzy Disjunctive and Conjunctive Canonical Forms, FDCF and FCCF, respectively. It is noted that in current literature most authors start with Type 1 membership functions and end up with Type 1 membership functions in knowledge representation and approximate reasoning. This approach naturally ignores the spread of gradation both in knowledge representation and in approximate reasoning. Some researchers start out with Type 1 membership representation, but uses FDCF and FCCF and end up with interval-valued Type 2 reasoning results. More recently, a few researchers finally began to capture Type 2 knowledge representation and develop reasoning schemas that determine Type 2 consequences. It is to be forecasted that in the new millennium more and more researchers will attempt to capture Type 2 representation and end up with Type 2 conclusions that reveal the information content available in information granules, as well as expose the risk associated with the gradation between the lower and the upper membership degrees. In turn, this will entail more realistic system model developments, which will help explore computing with perceptions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bilgic, T., Türkşen, I.B. (2000) Measurement of Membership Functions: Theoretical and Empericial Work, in: Handbook of Fuzzy Theory, D. Dubois and H. Prade (eds.), 195–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilgic, T., Türken, I.B. (1977) Measurement-Theoretical Frameworks in Fuzzy Theory, in: Fuzzy Logic in Artificial Intelligence, A. Ralescue, T. Martin (eds.), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 552–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilgic, T., Türken, I.B. (1997) Elicitation of Membership Functions: How Far Can Theory Take us?, Proceedings of Fuzzy-IEEE ‘87, July 1–5, Barcelona, Spain, Vol. III, 1321–1325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilgic, T., Türkşen, I.B. (1995) Measurement-Theoretical Justification of Connectives in Fuzzy Set Theory, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 76, 289–307.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Burillo, P., Bustince, H. (1996) Entropy on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets and on Fuzzy Sets and on Interval Valued Fuzzy Sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 78, 305–316.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Burillo, P., Bustince, H. (1995) Intuitionistic Fuzzy Relations Part I, Mathware Soft Comput. 2, 5–38.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bustince, H., Burillo, P. (1996) Interval Valued Fuzzy Relations in a Set Structures, J. Fuzzy Math., 4, 765–785.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gorzalczany, M.B. (1987) A method of Inference in Approximate Reasoning Based on Interval-valued, Fuzzy Sets Systems, 21, 1–17.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hisdal, E. (1981) The IF THEN ELSE Statement and Interval-valued Fuzzy Sets of Higher Type, Int’l Journal Man-Machine Studies, 15, 385–455.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • John, R.I. (1998) Type 2 Fuzzy Sets: An Appraisal of Theory and Applications, International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, Vol.6, No. 6, December, 563–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • John, R.I., Innocent, P.R., Barns, M.R. (1998) Type 2 Fuzzy Sets and Neuro-fuzzy Clustering of Radiographic Tibia Images, 1998 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, Anchorage, AK. May, 1373–1376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karnik, N.N., Mendel, J.M. (1998) Type 2 Fuzzy Logic Systems: Type-Reduction, Presented at 1998 IEEE SMC Conference, San Diego, CA, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karnik, N.N., Mendel, J.M. (1998) Introduction to Type 2 Fuzzy Logic Systems, Presented at1998 IEEE FUZZ Conference, Anchorage, AK. May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karnik, N.N., Mendel, J.M., Liang, Q. (1999) Type 2 Fuzzy Logic System“, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Systems. Vol. 7, No. 5, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang, Q., Mendel, J.M. (2000) Interval Type 2 Fuzzy Logic System, Proceedings of the 9` IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, 7–10 May San Antonio, Texas, 328–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang, Q., Mendel, J.M. (2000) Decision Feedback Equalizers for Non-linear Time Varying Channels using Type 2 Fuzzy Adaptive Filters, Proceedings of the 9 th IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, 7–10 May, San Antonio, Texas, 883–888.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marinos, P.N. (1969) Fuzzy Logic and its Application to Switching Systems, IEEE-Trans Comput. 4, 343–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menger, K. (1942) Statistical Metrics, in: Proceedings of the N. A. S, Vol. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizumoto, M, Tanaka, K. (1976) Some Properties of Fuzzy Sets of Type 2, Information and Control, 31, 312–340.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Norwich, A.M., Türkşen, I.B. (1982) The Fundamental Measurement of Fuzziness, in: Fuzzy Sets and Possibility Theory, R.R. Yager (ed.), Pergamon Press, New York, 49–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norwich, A.M., Türkşen, I.B. (1982) The Construction of Membership Functions, in: Fuzzy Sets and Possibility Theory, R.R. Yager (ed.), Pergamon Press, New York, 61–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norwich, A.M., Türkşen, I.B. (1982) Stochastic Fuzziness, in: Fuzzy Information and Decision Processes, M.M. Gupta and E.E. Sanches (eds.), North Holland, Amsterdam, 13–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norwich, A.M., Türkşen, I.B. (1984) A Model for the Measurement of Membership and the Consequences of its Empirical Implementation, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 12, 1–25.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Resconi, G., Türk,şen, I.B. (2001) Canonical Forms of Fuzzy Truthoods by Meta-Theory Based Upon Modal Logic, Information Sciences, 131, 157–194.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, M.K., Biswas, R. (1992) I-v Fuzzy Relations and Sanchez’s Approach for Medical Diagnosis, Fuzzy Sets Systems, 47, 35–38.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Türk,şen, I.B. (1979) Measurement of Linguistic Variables, Proceedings of the 23 rd Annual North American Meeting, Society for General Systems Research. January 3–6, Houston, Texas, 278–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Türkşen, I.B., Norwich, A.M. (1981) Measurement of Fuzziness, Proceedings of the International Conference on Policy Analysis and Information Systems, August 19–22, Taipei, Taiwan, Meadea Enterprises Co., Ltd. Taipei, Taiwan, 745–754.

    Google Scholar 

  • Türkşen, I.B. (1982) Stochastic and Fuzzy Sets, Proceedings of the 2’’ World Conference on Mathematics at the Service of Man. June 28-July 3, Las Palmas, Canary Islands, Spain, 649–654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Türkşen, I.B., Yao, D.D. (1982) Bounds on Fuzzy Inference, Proceedings of the Sixth European Meeting on Cybernetics and System Research, Vienna, April 13–16, 729–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Türkşen, I.B. (1983) Inference Regions for Fuzzy Propositions, in: Advances in Fuzzy Sets, Possibility Theory and Applications, P.P.Wang (ed), Plenum Press, New York, 137–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Türk,şen, I.B. (1986) Interval-valued Fuzzy Sets Based on Normal Forms“, Fuzzy Sets Systems, 20, 191–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Türkşen, I.B., Zhong, Z. (1990) An Approximate Analogical Reasoning Schema Based on Similarity Measures and Interval-valued Fuzzy Sets“, Fuzzy Sets Systems, 34, 323–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Türkşen, I.B. (1992) Interval-valued Fuzzy Sets and `Compensatory AND“, Fuzzy Sets Systems, 51, 295–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Türkşen, I.B. (1983) Measurement of Fuzziness: An Interpretation of the Azioms of Measurement, Proceedings of the IFAC Symposium, Marseill, France, July 19–21, 97–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Türkşen, I.B. (1991) Measurement of Membership Functions and Their Acquisitions, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 40, 5–38.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Türk,şen, I.B. (1995) Fuzzy Normal Forms, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 69, 319–346.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Türkşen, I.B., Bilgic, T. (1996) Interval-valued Strict Preference with Zadeh Triples, Fuzzy Sets Systems, 78, 183–195.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Türkyen, I.B., Kandel A., Zhang, Y.Q. (1998) Universal Truth Tables and Normal Forms, IEEE- Trans. On Fuzzy Systems, 6, 2, 295–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Türkşen, I.B., Kandel, A., Zhang, Y.Q. (1999) Normal Forms of Fuzzy Middle and Fuzzy Contradiction, IEEE-SMC, 29, Part B (Cybernetics) 2, 237–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Türkşen, I.B. (1999) Theories of Set and Logic with Crisp or Fuzzy Information Granules, Journal of Advance Computational Intelligence, 3, 4, 264–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagenknecht, M., Haitmann, K. (1988) Application of Fuzzy Sets of Type 2 to The Solution of Fuzzy Equation Systems, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 25, 183–190.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gerhrk, M., Walker, C., Walker, E. (2000) Fuzzy Normal Forms and Truth Tables, Proceedings of JCIS-2000, Feb. 27-March 3, Atlantic City, New Jersey, 211–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yager, R.R. (1980) Fuzzy Subsets of Type II in Decisions, J. of Cybernetics, 10, 137–159.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L.A. (1965) Fuzzy Sets, Information and Control Systems, 8, 338–353.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L.A. (1973) Outline of a New Approach to The Analysis of Complex Systems and Decision Processes Interval-valued Fuzzy Sets“, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybernet. 3 (1973) 28–44.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L.A. (1975) The Concept of a Linguistic Variable and Its Application to Approximate Reasoning, Part II, Information Sci., 8, 301–357.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L.A. (1996) Fuzzy Logic=Computing With Words, IEEE-Trans on Fuzzy Systems, 4, 2, 103–111.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L.A. (2000) Computing with Perceptions, Keynote Address, IEEE-Fuzzy Theory Conference, San Antonio, May 7–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, H.J., Zysno, P. (1980), Latent Connectives in Human Decision Making, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 4, 37–51.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zuo, Q., Türkşen, I.B., Nguyen, H.T., et al. (1995) In Expert Systems, Even If We Fix AND/OR Operations, A Natural Answer to a Composite Query is The Interval of Possible Degrees of Belief, Reliable Computing, Supplement (Extended Abstracts of APIC ‘85: International Workshop on Applications of Interval Computations), El Paso, TX, February 23–25, 236–240.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Türkşen, I.B. (2002). Sources, Measurements and Models of Type 2 Fuzziness in the New Millennium. In: Dimitrov, V., Korotkich, V. (eds) Fuzzy Logic. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 81. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1806-2_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1806-2_27

  • Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-2496-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7908-1806-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics