Abstract
Breast cancer continues to be one of the most deadly diseases among American women, which is the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality among American women. Currently there are more than 50 million women over the age of 40 at risk of breast cancer and approximately 144,000 new cases of breast cancer are expected each year in the United States. One out of eight women will develop breast cancer at some point during her lifetime in this country [1,2]. Because of the high incidence of breast cancer, any improvement in the process of diagnosing the disease may have a significant impact on saving lives and cutting costs in the health care system. Since the cause of breast cancer remains unknown and the earlier stage tumors can be more easily and less expensively treated, early detection is the key to breast cancer control. Mammography has proven to be the most reliable method and the major diagnosis means for detecting and classifying breast cancer in the early stage. Studies have shown a decrease in both severe breast cancer and mortality in women who undergo regular mammographic screens [3].
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
C. C. Boring, T. S. Squires, T. Tong, and S. Montgomery, “Cancer statistics”, CA-A Cancer J. Clinicians, Vol. 44, pp. 7–26, 1994.
E. Marshall, “Search for a kill: Focus shits from fat to hormones” , Sci., Vol. 259, pp. 618–621, 1995.
I. Andersson and B. F. Sigfusson, “Screening for breast cancer in Malmo: A randomized trial” , Recent Results in Cancer Research, Vol. 105, pp. 62–66, 1987.
S-M Lai, X. Li, and W. F. Bischof, “On techniques for detecting circumscribed masses in mammograms” , IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 337–386, 1989.
F. F. Yin, M. L. Giger, K. Doi, C. E. Metz, C. J. Vyborny and R. A. Schmidt, “Computerized detection of masses in digital mammograms: Analysis of bilateral subtraction images” , Medical Physics, Vol. 18, No. 5, pp. 955–963, Oct. 1991.
Y. Wu, M. L. Giger, K. Doi, C. J. Vyborny, R. A. Schmidt, and C. E. Metz, “Artificial neural networks in mammography: Application to decision making in the diagnosis of breast cancer” , Radiology, Vol. 187, No. 1, pp. 81–87, April 1993.
H. D. Li, M. Kallergi, L. P. Clarke, V. K. Jain and R. A. Clark, “Markov random field for tumor detection in digital mammography”, IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 565–576, 1995.
H. Kobatake and Y. Yoshinaga, “Detection of spicules on mammogram based on skeleton analysis” , IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 235–245, June 1996.
R. Gordon and R. M. Rangayyan, “Feature enhancement of film mammograms using fixed and adaptive neighborhoods” , Applied Optics, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 560–564, 1984.
A. P. Dhawan and E. L. Royer, “Mammographic feature enhancement by computerized image processing” , Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, Vol. 27, pp. 23–35, 1988.
W. M. Morrow, R. B. Paranjape, R. M. Rangayyan, and J. E. L. Desautels, “Region-based contrast enhancement of mammograms” , IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 392–406, 1992.
N. Petrick, Heanf-Ping Chan, B. Sahiner and D. Wei, “An adaptive densityweighted contrast enhancement filter for mammographic breast mass detection”, IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 59–67, Feb. 1996.
L. A. Zadeh, “Probability measures of fuzzy events” , Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, Vol. 23, pp. 421–427, 1968.
James C. Bezdek, “Fuzzy models — what are they, and why?” , IEEE Trans. on Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 1, No. 1, February 1993.
X. Li, Z. Zhao and H. D. Cheng, “Fuzzy entropy threshold approach to breast cancer detection”, Information Sciences, An International Journal, Applications, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1995.
L. Chen, H. D. Cheng and J. Zhang, “Fuzzy subfiber and its application to seismic lithology classification” , Information Sciences, Applications, An International Journal, Vol. 1, No. 2, March 1994.
H. D. Cheng, J. R. Chen and J. Li, “Threshold selection based on fuzzy cpartition entropy approach”, Pattern Recognition, Vol. 31, No. 7, pp. 857–870, 1998.
H. D. Cheng, Y. M. Lui, and R. I. Freimanis, “A novel approach to microcalcification detection using fuzzy logic technique”, IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 442–450, June 1998.
H. D. Cheng and H. J. Xu, “A novel fuzzy logic approach to contrast enhancement” , Pattern Recognition, Vol. 33, No. 5, pp. 809–819, May 2000.
M. T. Hagan, H. B. Demuth and M. Beale, Neural Network Design, PSW Publishing, 1996.
S. K. Pal and D. K. D. Majumder, Fuzzy Mathematical Approach to Pattern Recognition, John Wiley & Sons, 1986.
S. K. Pal and R. A. King, “Image enhancement using smoothing with fuzzy sets” , IEEE Trans. on System, Man and Cybernetics, Vol. 11, No. 7, pp. 404–501, July 1981.
N. R. Pal and S. K. Pal, “Entropy: A new definition and its applications”, IEEE Trans. Syst., Man Cybernetics, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 1260–1270, 1991.
R. C. Gonzalez and R. E. Woods, Digital Image Processing, 3rd Edition. Addison-Wesley, MA, 1992.
M. K. Hu, “Visual pattern recognition by moment invariants” , IRE Trans. on Information Theory, IT-8, pp. 179–187, Feb. 1962.
C. H. Teh and R. T. Chin, “On image analysis by the methods of moments”, IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 496–512, July 1988.
M. R. Teague, “Image analysis via the general theory of moments” , J. Opt. Soc. Am., Vol. 70, No. 8, pp. 920–930, Aug. 1980.
S. Haykin, Neural Networks — A Comprehensive Foundation, Macmillan College Publishing Company, Inc., 1994.
E. Gose, R. Johnsonbaugh, and S. Jost, Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 1996.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cheng, H.D., Hu, Y.G., Hung, D.L., Wu, C.Y. (2002). Breast Cancer Classification Using Fuzzy Central Moments. In: Barro, S., Marín, R. (eds) Fuzzy Logic in Medicine. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 83. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1804-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1804-8_3
Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-2498-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-7908-1804-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive