Possibilistic Belief Network Constructed by Operators of Composition and its Application to Financial Analysis

  • Radim Jiroušek
  • Jiřina Vejnarová
  • Jozef Gemeľa
Part of the Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing book series (STUDFUZZ, volume 88)


Bayesian networks have become one of the most popular multidimensional models for uncertain knowledge formalization. Possibilistic belief networks that are their possibilistic counterpart, though not so popular, seem to possess a couple of minor but pleasant advantages: the distributions are easier to modify to adopt expert subjective knowledge, and conditioning in possibility theory is dependent on a selected t-norm and therefore the apparatus seems to be more flexible.

The main part of this paper describes a new way of defining possibilistic belief networks as a sequence of low-dimensional distributions connected by operators of composition. To make this nonstandard technique more easily comprehensible, we introduce an extended motivation part explaining the basic notions through a simple (probabilistic) example. The paper is concluded by a lucid example: an application of the apparatus for fundamental analysis of engineering enterprises.


Bayesian Network Acyclic Directed Graph Debt Ratio Multidimensional Model Possibility Distribution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    de Cooman, G. (1997) Possibility theory I: The measure-and integral-theoretic groundwork. Int. J. of General Systems 25, 291–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    de Cooman, G. (1997) Possibility theory II: Conditional possibility. Int. J. of General Systems 25, 325–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    de Cooman, G. (1997) Possibility theory III: Possibilistic independence. Int. J. of General Systems, 25, 353–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Danos, P., Imhoff, E. A. (1992) Introduction to Financial Accounting. Irwin 1992.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Dubois, D., Prade, H. (1988) Possibility theory. Plenum Press, New York, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Gemeľa, J. (2000) Financial Analysis Using Bayesian Networks. To appear in: Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Hâjek, P., Havrdnek, T., Jirousek, R. (1992) Uncertain Information Processing in Expert Systems. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Jensen, F. V. (1996) Introduction to Bayesian Network. UCL Press, London.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Jirousek, R. (1997) Composition of probability measures on finite spaces. In Proc. of the 13th Con. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence UAI’97, Providence, RI, August 1997 ( D. Geiger, P. P. Shenoy, eds.). Morgan Kaufmann Publ. San Francisco, California, 274–281.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Jirousek, R. (1998) Graph Modelling without Graphs. In Proc. of the 7th Conf. on Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty IPMU’98, Paris, France, July 1998 ( B. Bouchon-Meunier, R. R. Yager, eds.). E.D.K., Paris, 809–816.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Lam, W., Bacchus, F. (1994) Learning Bayesian Belief Networks: An Approach Based on the MDL Principle. Computational Intelligence 10, 269–293.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Lauritzen, S. L., Spiegelhalter, D. (1988) Local computations with probabilities on graphical structures and their applications to expert systems. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. 50, 157–189.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Shafer, G. (1996) Probabilistic Expert Systems. SIAM, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Vejnarovâ, J. (1998) Composition of possibility measures on finite spaces: preliminary results. In Proc. of the 7th Conf. on Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty IPMU’98, Paris, France, July 1998 ( B. Bouchon-Meunier, R. R. Yager, eds.). E.D.K., Paris, 25–30.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Radim Jiroušek
    • 1
  • Jiřina Vejnarová
    • 1
  • Jozef Gemeľa
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory for Intelligent SystemsUniversity of EconomicsPragueCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations