Introduction to Belief Functions
This chapter introduces a theoretical perspective that may be used in business research and practice when confronting decision tasks that involve uncertainly. The main body of the chapter is an introduction to Belief Functions. The introduction includes a discussion of the fundamental constructs and then illustrates the use of belief functions in a business (audit) setting.
KeywordsBasic Belief Belief Function Basic Probability Assignment Audit Objective Certified Public Accountant
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. 1983. Statement on Auditing Standards, No, 47: Audit Risk and Materiality in Conducting an Audit. New York: AICPA.Google Scholar
- American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. 1997a. AICPA/CICA Web Trust Principles and Criteria for Business-to-Consumer Electronic Commerce. http://www.aicpa.org/webtrust/princrit/htm.
- American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. 1997b. Report of the Special Committee on Assurance Services. http://www.aicpa.org.
- Curley, S. P., and Golden, J.I. 1994. Using belief functions to represent degrees of belief. Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes: 271 — 303.Google Scholar
- Einhorn, H. J., and Hogarth, R. M. 1986. Decision Making under Ambiguity. The Journal of Business, 59(4), Pt. 2 (October), S225 - S250.Google Scholar
- Gabbay, D. M., and P. Smets. 1998. Handbook of Defeasible Reasoning and Uncertainty Management Systems. Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
- Harrison, K. 1999. Evaluation and Aggregation of Audit Evidence under Uncertainty: An Empirical Study of Belief Functions. Ph.D. Dissertation, School of Business, University of Kansas.Google Scholar
- Krishnamoorthy, G., T.J. Mock, and M. Washington. 1999. A Comparative Evaluation of Belief Revision Models in Auditing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Vol. 18, pp. 104 - 126.Google Scholar
- Monroe, G and J. Ng. 2001. The Descriptive Ability of Models of Audit Risk. Belief-Functions in Business Decisions. R. Srivastava and T. Mock (Eds).Google Scholar
- Shafer, G. 1976. A Mathematical Theory of Evidence Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Shafer, G., P.P. Shenoy, and R. P. Srivastava. 1988. Auditor’s Assistant: A knowledge engineering tool for audit decisions. Proceedings of the 1988 Touche Ross/University of Kansas Symposium on Auditing Problems. Lawrence, KS: School of Business, University of Kansas, pp. 61-84.Google Scholar
- Shafer, G., and R.P. Srivastava. 1990. The bayesian and belief-function formalisms. A general perspective for auditing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 9 (Supplement), pp. 110 - 48.Google Scholar
- Smets, P. 1990a. The Combination of Evidence in the Transferable Belief Model. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 12, 5 (May).Google Scholar
- Smets, P. 1990b. Constructing the Pignistic Probability Function in a Context of Uncertainty. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 5. ed. by Henrion, M., Shachter, R.D., Kanal, L.N., and Lemmer, J.F. North-Holland: Elsevier Science Publishers B. V.Google Scholar
- Smets, P. 1998. The Transferable Belief Model For Quantified Belief Representation. Quantified Representation for Uncertainty and Imprecision, Vol. 1. Edited by P. Smets. Kluwer Academic PublishersGoogle Scholar
- Spohn, W. 1998. Ordinal Conditional functions: A Dynamic Theory of Epistemic States. Causation. Decision, Belief Changes, and Statistics, II, edited by W. L. Harper and B. Skyrms. D. Reidel.Google Scholar
- Spohn, W. 1990. A General Non-Probabilistic Theory of Inductive Reasoning, Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. Elsvier Science Publications: 149 - 158.Google Scholar
- Srivastava, R. P. 1995a. A General Scheme for Aggregating Evidence in Auditing: Propagation of Beliefs in Networks. Artificial Intelligence in Accounting and Auditing, Vol. 3, Miklos A. Vasarhelyi, editor, Markus Wiener Publishers, Princeton: 55 - 99.Google Scholar
- Srivastava, R. P. 1995b. The Belief-Function Approach to Aggregating Audit Evidence” International Journal of Intelligent Systems (March): 329-356.Google Scholar
- Srivastava, R. P. 1996. Value Judgments using Belief Functions. Research in Accounting Ethics, Vol. 2, pp. 109 - 130.Google Scholar
- Srivastava, R. P. 1997a. Decision Making Under Ambiguity: A Belief-Function Perspective. Archives of Control Sciences, Vol. 6 (XLII): 5 - 27.Google Scholar
- Srivastava, R. P. 1997b. Integrating Statistical and Non-Statistical Evidence Using Belief Functions. Encyclopedia of Computer Science and Technology, Vol. 37, edited by Allen Kent, James G. Williams, and Carolyn M. Hall, published by Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York (Supplement 22), pp. 157-174.Google Scholar
- Srivastava, R. P. and G. Shafer. 1992. Belief-Function Formulas for Audit Risk. The Accounting Review, Vol. 67, No. 2 (April): 249 - 283.Google Scholar
- Srivastava, R. P., S. Dutta, and R. Johns. 1996. An Expert System Approach to Audit Planning and Evaluation in the Belief-Function Framework. International Journal of Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, Vol. 5, No. 3: 165 - 183.Google Scholar
- Srivastava, R. P., and T. J. Mock. 1999. Evidential Reasoning for WebTrust Assurance Services. Journal of Management Information Systems. Winter 1999-2000, Vol.1,6, No. 3, pp. 11 — 32. 16Google Scholar
- Wright, A., T. J. Mock, and R. P. Srivastava. 1998. Audit Program Planning using A Belief Function Framework. Proceedings of the 1998 Deloitte and Touche University of Kansas Symposium on Auditing Problems, Lawrence, KS: School of Business, University of Kansas, pp. 115 - 142.Google Scholar
- Zadeh, L. A. 1979. A Theory of Approximate Reasoning. Machine Intelligence, edited by J. E. Ayes, D. Mitchie andn L I Mikulich. Chichester, UK: Ellis Horwood.Google Scholar