Abstract
Understanding the process of proof in judicial decision making necessarily involves an appreciation of the operation of commonsense knowledge and reasoning in fact determination. Throughout the history of Western civilization, commentators have recognized the crucial role of common sense in our understanding of the world.3 The central role of common sense is further highlighted by the attempts of artificial intelligence (“AI”) to build machines that can see, move, and act. These efforts confirm that we cannot navigate through life without tacitly drawing upon common sense. Steven Pinker illustrates:
You know when Irving puts the dog in the car, it is no longer in the yard. When Edna goes to church, her head goes with her. If Doug is in the house, he must have gone in though some opening unless he was born there and never left. If Sheila is alive at 9 A.M. and is alive at 5 P.M., she was also alive at noon. Zebras in the wild never wear underwear.4
“The aim of artificial intelligence is to provide a computational model of intelligent behavior, most importantly, commonsense reasoning.”.
Judea Pearl
“A common man marvels at uncommon things; a wise man marvels at the commonplace.”
Confucius
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Maccrimmon, M. (2002). What Is “Common” about Common Sense? Cautionary Tales for Travelers Crossing Disciplinary Boundaries. In: MacCrimmon, M., Tillers, P. (eds) The Dynamics of Judicial Proof. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 94. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1792-8_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1792-8_4
Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-00323-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-7908-1792-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive