Attribution of responsibility, whether as blame or praise, always rests on a claim about causation. In order to be responsible for an event, a person must take an action that causes the event. This creates a philosophical puzzle. As philosophers, we tend to be skeptical about claims of causal knowledge. No matter how thoroughly we have studied a phenomenon, we say, we may not have gotten to the bottom of it and really understood its causal structure. But as judges and juries, we are prepared to conclude that a certain action has caused a certain result. How can we reconcile our philosophical and scientific skepticism with our practical credulity?
Event Tree Supra Note Causal Structure Instantaneous Event Causal Knowledge
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.