Skip to main content

Validation of Concept Representation with Rule Induction and Linguistic Variables

  • Chapter
Data Mining, Rough Sets and Granular Computing

Part of the book series: Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing ((STUDFUZZ,volume 95))

  • 273 Accesses

Abstract

This paper shows problems with combination of rule induction and attribute-oriented generalization, where if the given hierarchy includes inconsistencies, then application of hierarchical knowledge generates inconsistent rules. Then, we introduce two approaches to solve this problem, one process of which suggests that combination of rule induction and attribute-oriented generalization can be used to validate concept hiearchy. Interestingly, fuzzy linguistic variables play an important role in solving these problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Y.D. Cai, N. Cercone and J. Han, Attribute-oriented induction in relational databases. in: Shapiro, G. P. and Frawley, W. J. (eds), Knowledge Discovery in Databases, AAAI press, Palo Alto, CA, pp. 213–228 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fayyad, U.M., et al.(eds.): Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, AAAI Press (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lin, T.Y. Fuzzy Partitions: Rough Set Theory, in Proceedings of IPMU’98, Paris, pp. 1167–1174, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lin, T.Y. Context Free Fuzzy Sets and Information Tables Proceedings of EUFIT’98, Aachen, pp. 76–80, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pawlak, Z., Rough Sets. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1991.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Pawlak, Z. Conflict analysis. In: Proceedings of the Fifth European Congress on Intelligent Techniques and Soft Computing (EUFIT’97), pp. 1589–1591, Verlag Mainz, Aachen, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pawlak, Z. Rough Modus Ponens. Proceedings of IPMU’98, Paris, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pawlak, Z. Rough Sets and Decision Analysis, Fifth IIA SA workshop on Decision Analysis and Support, Laxenburg, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pedrycz, W. and Gomide, F. An Introduction to Fuzzy Sets - Analysis and Design, MIT Press, MA, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Skowron, A. and Grzymala-Busse, J. From rough set theory to evidence theory. In: Yager, R., Fedrizzi, M. and Kacprzyk, J.(eds.) Advances in the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Evidence, pp. 193–236, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Readings in Machine Learning, (Shavlik, J. W. and Dietterich, T.G., eds.) Morgan Kaufmann, Palo Alto, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tsumoto, S. Knowledge Discovery in Medical Databases based on Rough Sets and Attribute-Oriented Generalization. Proceedings of IEEE-FUZZ99, IEEE Press, Anchorage, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tsumoto, S. Automated Induction of Medical Expert System Rules from Clinical Databases based on Rough Set Theory Information Sciences 112, 67–84, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tsumoto, S., Automated Discovery of Plausible Rules based on Rough Sets and Rough Inclusion, Proceedings of PAKDD ‘89,(in press), LNAI, Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zadeh, L.A., Toward a theory of fuzzy information granulation and its certainty in human reasoning and fuzzy logic. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 90, 111–127, 1997.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Zadeh, L.A., The concept of linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning. Information Sciences 8, 199–249 (part I), 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zadeh, L.A., The concept of linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning. Information Sciences 8, 301–357 (part II), 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zadeh, L.A., The concept of linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning. Information Sciences 9, 43–80 (part IIII), 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ziarko, W., Variable Precision Rough Set Model. Journal of Computer and System Sciences. 46, 39–59, 1993.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tsumoto, S. (2002). Validation of Concept Representation with Rule Induction and Linguistic Variables. In: Lin, T.Y., Yao, Y.Y., Zadeh, L.A. (eds) Data Mining, Rough Sets and Granular Computing. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 95. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1791-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1791-1_4

  • Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-2508-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7908-1791-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics