Towards Efficient Fuzzy Information Processing pp 297-324 | Cite as

# System Analytic Model for Natural Disasters

## Abstract

In this chapter, we give a fuzzy system analytic model to assess risk of natural disasters. We suppose that a natural disaster system includes risk source, site, damage and loss. In the model, information distribution technique is used to calculate basic fuzzy relationships showing the historical experience of natural disasters. In section 11.1, we review classical system model for risk assessment of natural disaster and give some definitions to standardize the concepts. In section 11.2, the method of information distribution is employed to calculate the fuzzy relationship between magnitude and probability. Section 11.3 gives fuzzy-system analytic model. In section 11.4, we use the model to study the fuzzy risk of earthquake disaster for a city. The chapter is then summarized with a conclusion in section 11.5.

## Keywords

Risk Assessment Natural Disaster Information Gain Damage Index Information Distribution## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- 1.Anderson, J. G. (1978), On the attenuation of Modified Mercalli Intensity with distance in the United States. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
**68**, pp. 1147–1179Google Scholar - 2.Cornell,C.A. (1968), Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
**58**, pp. 1583–160Google Scholar - 3.Ellsworth, W. L., Matthews, M. V., Nadeau, R. M., Nishenko, S. P., Reasenberg, P.A., and Simpson, R. W. (1998), A physically-based earthquake recurrence model for estimation of long-term earthquake probabilities. Proceedings of the Second Joint Meeting of the UJNR Panel on Earthquake Research, pp. 135–149Google Scholar
- 4.Hagiwara, Y. (1974), Probability of earthquake occurrence as obtained from a Weibull distribution analysis of crustal strain. Tectonophysics
**23**, pp. 323–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 5.Huang, C.F. (1996), Fuzzy risk assessment of urban natural hazards, Fuzzy Sets and Systems
**83**, pp. 271–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 6.Huang, C.F., and Ruan, D. (1999), Systems analytic models for fuzzy risk estimation. Zadeh, L.A. and Kacprzyk, J. (eds): Computing with Words in Information/Intelligent Systems 2. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, pp. 195Google Scholar
- 7.Huang, C.F. and Wang, J.D. (1995), Technology of Fuzzy Information Optimization Processing and Applications. Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Press, Beijing (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- 8.Musson, R. (1998), Seismicity and Earthquake Hazard in the UK. http://www.gsrg.nmh.ac.uk/hazard/hazuk.htmGoogle Scholar
- 9.Musson, R.M.W. (1994), A Catalogue of British Earthquakes. British Geological Survey Technical Report, No. WL/94/04Google Scholar
- 10.Nishenko, S. P., and Buland, R. (1987), A generic recurrence interval distribution for earthquake forecasting. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
**77**, pp. 1382–1399Google Scholar - 11.Rikitake, T. (1974), Probability of an earthquake occurrence as estimated from crustal strain. Tectonophysics
**23**, pp. 299–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 12.Utsu, T. (1972a), Large earthquakes near Hokkaido and the expectancy of the occurrence of a large earthquake of Nemuro. Report of the Coordinating Committee for Earthquake Prediction
**7**, pp. 7–13Google Scholar - 13.Utsu, T.(1972ó), Aftershocks and earthquake statistics (IV). Journal of the Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University Series VII (Geophysics)
**4**, pp. 1–42Google Scholar - 14.Utsu, T. (1984), Estimation of parameters for recurrence models of earthquakes. Bulletin of the Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo
**59**, pp. 5366Google Scholar - 15.Xiu, X. W. and Huang, C.F. (1989), Fuzzy identification between dynamic response of structure and structural earthquake damage. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 57, (in Chinese).Google Scholar