Modeling a Distributed Knowledge Management for Cooperative Agents
- 135 Downloads
This paper shows modeling a distributed knowledge management in collaborative agents, introducing knowledge migration between agents. In multi-agent environment, each agent can be working at common goals with globally cooperative behaviors. In order to form cooperation,agents first migrate related knowledge, locally evaluate the others’ requirements, then agents finally can form a plan to achieve goals. In order to construct integrating agent’s behavior and cooperation among agents in knowledge level, we propose four goals; (1)cooperation of software agents in the communication between agents to achieve a common goal, (2)adaptability of a software agent when its autonomous software agent can control its correct behavior in the environment and can manage both its knowledge and other agents’ migrated knowledge to execute its behavior in knowledge-level, (3)mobility of a real-world mobile agent when mobile computer and autonomous mobile robot equipped with a network can execute its behavior by knowledge migration between mobile computer and autonomous mobile robot, and (4)transparency of knowledge migration when the communication requires to construct transparent knowledge boundaries between real space and virtual space which a computer generates in its display. In this paper, we present two approaches for agent collaboration to resolve the above mentioned issues. As for the first approach, we introduce social agency model for constructing a prototype system for guide activities in a laboratory. As for the second approach, we present an autonomous agent’s architecture in social agency aimed at communicating with other agents in knowledge-level. Based on these approaches, we will propose a distributed knowledge model between agents and within one agent.
KeywordsMobile Robot Path Planning Mobile Agent Software Agent Idle State
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.J. Bradshaw, editor. (1997) Software Agents. MIT Press.Google Scholar
- 2.T. Finin, Y. Labrou and J. Mayfield. (1997) KQML as an agent communication language. In J. Bradshaw, editor. Software Agents. MIT Press.Google Scholar
- 3.L. Gasser. (1991) Social conceptions of knowledge and action: DAI foundations and open systems semantics. Artificial Intelligence 47, 107–138.Google Scholar
- 4.Kurt G. Konolige. (1998) Saphira Software Manual. Version 6.1e. April. 1998.Google Scholar
- 5.Dejan S. Milojicic, William LaForge and Deepika Chauhan. (1998) Mobile Objects and Agents(MOA). Proceedings of the Fourth USENIX Conference on Object-Oriented Technologies and Systems(COOTS98). Santa Fe, New Mexico.Google Scholar
- 6.K. Nagao and J. Rekimoto. (1996) Agent augmented reality: A software agent meets the real world. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Systems (ICMAS-96). AAAI Press, 228–235.Google Scholar
- 7.Jim Odell and William Tozier. (1999) Agents and Complex Systems. ASA/MA Tutorial. The Joint Symposium ASA/MA99, First International Symposium on Agent Systems and Applications (ASA’99), Third International Symposium on Mobile Agents (MA’99).Google Scholar
- 8.T. Ono, M. Imai, T. Etani and R. Nakatsu. (2000) Construction of Relationship between Humans and Robots. Transactions of Information Processing Society of Japan. Vol. 41. Number 1, 158–166.Google Scholar
- 9.A. S. Rao and M. P. Georgeff. (1991) Modeling Agents within a BDI-Architecture. In International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR). Cambridge. Massachusetts. April. Morgan Kaufmann, 473–484.Google Scholar
- 10.Munindar P. Singh. (1994) Multi agent Systems: A Theoretical Framework for Intentions, Know-How, and Communications. Springer-Verlag. Heidelberg, Germany.Google Scholar