Abstract
In a broad sense, fuzziness is the opposite of precision. Everything that cannot be defined precisely (that is, according to some broadly accepted criteria or norms of precision) and everything that has no clearly described boundaries in space or time is considered a bearer of fuzziness. In a narrow sense, fuzziness relates to the definition of fuzzy sets as proposed by Zadeh (Zadeh, 1965): sets, the belongingness to which is measured by a membership function whose values are between 1 (full belongingness) and 0 (non-belongingness).
I do not insist that my argument is right in all other respects, but I would contend at all costs both in word and deed as far as I could that we will be better men, braver and less idle, if we believe that one must search for the things that one does not know, rather than if we believe that it is not possible to find out what we do not know and that we must not look for it.
Socrates
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dimitrov, V., Hodge, B. (2002). Introduction to Social Fuzziology. In: Social Fuzziology. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 107. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1778-2_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1778-2_1
Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-00309-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-7908-1778-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive