Advertisement

Rough Sets pp 465-500 | Cite as

From Rough to Fuzzy

  • Lech Polkowski
Part of the Advances in Soft Computing book series (AINSC, volume 15)

Abstract

We have witnessed the development of logical calculi with truth values ranging continuously from 0 to 1 and in the development of the fuzzy sentential logic we have treated the set of logical axioms as a fuzzy set. The fuzzy sentential calculus in Chapter 13 has been developed in the framework of residuated lattices and an essential usage has been made of the adjoint pair (⊗, →). In the wider perspective of fuzzy calculi on sets it has turned useful to extend the notion of an adjoint pair to the notion of a pair (T,→ T ) where T is a triangular norm (or, tnorm) and → T is the induced residuated implication. t — norms and duals of them, tconorms, may be applied in the development of algebra of fuzzy sets viz. t — norms determine intersections of fuzzy sets according to the formula X A∩B (x) = T ( XA (x), XB (x)) where T is a t — norm and XA is the fuzzy characteristic (membership) function of the fuzzy set A while t — conorms may be used in determining unions of fuzzy sets via X A∪B (x) = T ( XA (x), XB (x)) where S is a t — conorm.

Keywords

Residuated Lattice Fuzzy Partition Triangular Norm Adjoint Pair Fuzzy Similarity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [Aczél49]
    J. Aczél, Sur les operations defines pour les nombres réels, Bull. Soc. Math. France, 76 (1949), pp. 59 — 64.Google Scholar
  2. [Arnold63]
    V. I. Arnold, On functions of three variables, Amer. Math. Soc. Transi., 28 (1963), pp. 51 — 54.Google Scholar
  3. [Caianiello87]
    E. R. Caianiello, C — calculus: an overview, in: E.R. Caianiello and M. A. Aizerman (eds.), Topics in the General Theory of Structures,Reidel, Dordrecht, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [Cattaneo98]
    G. Cattaneo, Abstract approximation spaces for rough theories, in: L. Polkowski and A. Skowron (eds.), Rough Sets in Knowledge Discovery. Methodology and Applications, vol. 18 in Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, Physica Verlag, Heidelberg, 1998, pp. 59 — 98.Google Scholar
  5. [Cattaneo97]
    G. Cattaneo, Generalized rough sets. Preclusivity fuzzy — intuitionistic (BZ) lattices, Studia Logica, 58 (1997), pp. 47–77.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [Cattaneo — Nistico89]
    G. Cattaneo and G. Nisticb, Brouwer — Zadeh posets and three valued Lukasiewicz posets, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 33 (1989), pp. 165 —190.Google Scholar
  7. [Dempster67]
    A. P. Dempster, Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multiple — valued mapping, Annals Math. Stat., 38 (1967), pp. 325 — 339.Google Scholar
  8. [Driankov93]
    D. Driankov, H. Hellendoorn, and M. Reinfrank, An Introduction to Fuzzy Control, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1993.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [Dubois — Prade92]
    D. Dubois and H. Prade, Putting rough sets and fuzzy sets together, in: R. Slowinski (ed.),Intelligent Decision Support. Handbook of Applications and Advances of the Rough Sets Theory, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1992, pp. 203 — 232.Google Scholar
  10. [Dubois — Prade88]
    D. Dubois and H. Prade (with coll.), Possibility Theory: An Approach to Computerized processing of Uncertainty, Plenum Press, New York, 1988.Google Scholar
  11. [Farinas del Cerro86]
    L. Farinas del Cerro and H. Prade, Rough sets, twofold fuzzy sets and modal logic — fuzziness in indiscernibility and partial information, in: A. Di Nola and A. G. S. Ventre (eds.), The Mathematics of Fuzzy Systems, Verlag TUV Rheinland, Köln, 1986.Google Scholar
  12. [Faucett55]
    W. M. Faucett, Compact semigroups irreducibly connected between two idempotents, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 6 (1955), pp. 741 — 747.Google Scholar
  13. [Höhle88]
    U. Höhle, Quotients with respect to similarity relations,Fuzzy Sets Syst., 27 (1988), pp. 31 — 44.Google Scholar
  14. [Kolmogorov63]
    A. N. Kolmogorov, On the representation of continuous functions of many variables by superposition of continuous functions of one variable and addition,Amer. Math. Soc. Transi., 28 (1963), pp. 55 — 59.Google Scholar
  15. [Lindenbaum33]
    A. Lindenbaum, Sur les ensembles dans lesquels toutes les équations d’une famille donnée ont un nombre de solution fixé davance, Fund. Math., 20 (1933), p. 20.Google Scholar
  16. [Ling65]
    C. — H. Ling, Representation of associative functions, Publ. Math. Debrecen, 12 (1965), pp. 189–212.Google Scholar
  17. [Mantaras–Valverde88]
    L. de Mântaras and L. Valverde, New results in fuzzy clustering based on the concept of indistinguishability relation, IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine intelligence, 10 (1988), pp. 754–757.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [Menger42]
    K. Menger, Statistical metrics, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 28 (1942), pp. 535–537.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [Menu–Pavelka76]
    J. Menu and J. Pavelka, A note on tensor products on the unit interval, 17 (1976), pp. 71–83.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. [Mostert–Shields57]
    P. S. Mostert and A. L. Shields, On the structure of semigroups on a compact manifold with boundary, Ann. Math., 65 (1957), pp. 117–143.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [Nakamura88]
    A. Nakamura, Fuzzy rough sets, Notes on Multiple–Valued Logic in Japan, 9 (1988), pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
  22. [Nakamura–Gao91]
    A. Nakamura and J. M. Gao, A logic for fuzzy data analysis, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 39 (1991), pp. 127–132.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [Pal–Skowron99]
    S. K. Pal and A. Skowron, Rough–Fuzzy Hybridization. A New Trend in Decision–Making, Springer Verlag, Singapore, 1999.MATHGoogle Scholar
  24. [Pavelka79a,b,c]
    J. Pavelka, On fuzzy logic I, II, III,Zeit. Math. Logik Grund. Math., 25 (1979), pp. 45-52, 119-134, 447-464.Google Scholar
  25. [Pawlak85c]
    Z. Pawlak, Rough sets and fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 17 (1985), pp. 99–102.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [Pedrycz99]
    W. Pedrycz, Shadowed sets: bringing fuzzy and rough sets,in: [Pal–Skowron], pp. 179-199.Google Scholar
  27. [Ruspini9l]
    E. H. Ruspini, On the semantics of fuzzy logic, Int. J. Approx. Reasoning, 5 (1991), pp. 45–88.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [Schweizer–Sklar83]
    B. Schweizer and A. Sklar, Probabilistic Metric Spaces, North–Holland, Amsterdam, 1983.MATHGoogle Scholar
  29. [Shafer76]
    G. Shafer, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence, Princeton U. Press, Princeton N. J., 1976.Google Scholar
  30. [Sierpiński34]
    W. Sierpiński, Remarques sur les fonctions de plusieurs variables réelles,Prace Matematyczno — Fizyczne, 41 (1934), pp. 171 — 175.Google Scholar
  31. [Valverde85]
    L. Valverde, On the structure of F–indistinguishability operators,Fuzzy Sets Syst., 17 (1985), pp. 313 — 328.Google Scholar
  32. [Zadeh78]
    L. A. Zadeh, Fuzzy sets as a basis for the theory of possibility,Fuzzy Sets Syst., 1 (1978), pp. 3 — 28.Google Scholar
  33. [Zadeh7l]
    L. A. Zadeh, Similarity relations and fuzzy orderings, Information Sciences, 3 (1971), pp. 177–200.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. [Zadeh65]
    L. A. Zadeh, Fuzzy sets, Information and Control, 8 (1965), pp. 338–353.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lech Polkowski
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Polish-Japanese Institute of Information TechnologyWarsawPoland
  2. 2.Department of Mathematics and Computer ScienceUniversity of Wormia and MazuryOlsztynPoland

Personalised recommendations